Comments by "Ivan" (@Ivan-wp1ne1) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. The German press writes: The Russians are fighting better... than expected "The Russians are fighting better than expected. The attacks since Thursday have not yet led to the liberation of any cities or even villages," writes Bild, describing the events on the southern front. You read these reports of the German press today about the unexpected resilience of the Russian army, and you remember that 80 years ago, already other Germans, in the same way, at first with surprise, and then with horror, wrote... the same: "October 1, 1942. Our assault battalion reached the Volga. More precisely, the Volga is still 500 meters away. Tomorrow we will be on the other side and the war is over." "October 3. Very strong fire resistance, we cannot overcome these 500 meters. We are standing on the border of some grain elevator." "October 6th. Damn elevator. It is impossible to approach him. Our losses exceeded 30%." "October 10th. Where do these Russians come from? The elevator is no longer there, but every time we approach it, there is a fire coming from under the ground." "October 15th. Hooray, we have overcome the elevator. There are 100 people left from our battalion." And a little lower: "It turned out that the elevator was defended by 18 Russians, we found 18 corpses." Comment: I would advise modern Germans (and not only them) to read the memoirs of their own soldiers, officers and generals of that war, who ended their "victorious" campaign in Russia by capitulating in Berlin. As we can see, history repeats itself here too,
    34
  2. 14
  3. 13
  4. 11
  5. 10
  6. 9
  7. 9
  8. 7
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries… @ukr_leaks
    2