Comments by "Ivan" (@Ivan-wp1ne1) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  47. Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1