Comments by "Acid Joke" (@PWMoze) on "Richard The Fourth" channel.

  1. The same kind of emotional blackmail was used on Channel 4 news last night. The narrative was that the migrants are like children and should be cared for and protected. The implication being that they are not responsible for their own actions and if they are not treated well then we (The British) are abdicating our duty of care. They also had an item suggesting that the Irish authorities should have the right to return unwanted migrants to the UK. They said that the Rwanda Scheme had frightened them so much that they all felt thwt they had to move on. The implication was that this was unfair. Ten minutes later, ironically, they had an item about the current record levels of homelessness amongst children in the UK, totally failing to make any kind of link between the two stories. As long as the Rwanda Scheme is in operation I suppose we can expect a lot more of this kind of news coverage?
    3
  2. I was blocked the very first time I left a comment on Novaro, about four years ago. It was an item about how, at the Labour Party Conference, Starmer was ignoring the demands from Student Unions to be more left wing. I simply commented, 'What do you expect? Get real kiddies!'. I have never been able to leave a comment since. It's funny really.
    3
  3.  @Fosterwongzzz  I think that's what Dawkins wss saying. Even Christopher Hitchens would probably agree with that sentiment, I certainly do.
    3
  4. If people think that crime carries no effective consequence nowadays could it be because the police, the courts and the prisons have been rendered no longer fit for purpose?
    3
  5. @garyshotter8802  For that very reason I would describe it as an entirely undemocratic element of our political system. We are asked to just trust that our betters, 'the great and the good', can be relied upon to pursue our best interests, not their own. Like the Arch Bishop of Canterbury protected the interests of all those abused youngsters not his colleague. It's blatantly and deliberately undemocratic.
    3
  6. Dear Gary, I tried virtue signalling by parroting the woke, liberal talking points and for some reason I wasn't given a cushy job, millions of pounds in wages and twenty year old models. What am I doing wrong? Should I try harder by talking about issues that hardly effect me, expressing concern about people I'm never going to have to meet in person and demanding that tax payers should shoulder the burden of my endless compassion?
    2
  7.  @jasonhaven7170  A lot of people agree with the Reform UK stance but just can't stomach Farage. It may well become necessary to force him to move over if they're going to get enough votes to form a government?. Personally I would prefer Rupert Lowe or even Ben Habib. Then again I would vote for Tommy if I had half a chance.
    2
  8. Excellent content. Well said.
    2
  9. @roboi2241  i don't care about Andrew Tate but I would love to ask Emily Maitliss what it is exactly that she so strongly objects to about JP. Because his work appeals to men? Are men to have nothing to inspire them but independent strong female figures in her philosophy? Or perhaps it is because he refuses to be bullied into going along with the feminized discourse and values that modern progressives expect everyone to blindly accept?
    2
  10.  @roboi2241  You are probably right. If you were to ask her for evidence or quotes to support her view of him, she would probably struggle to come up with anything substantial, but that won't bother her or anyone who follows her.
    2
  11. The mainstream media are at pains to discourage the public speculating about the murderer's identity and motives. Given the awful nature of the attack, is it surprising that people are drawing their own conclusions? We're not stupid, we all know who these senseless knife attacks are usually perpetrated by, so who can blame us if we join all the dots and think the obvious?
    2
  12. Despite the woke values constantly being promoted football matches are still the only places left where working class men can let off steam, express some love and some hate, even wave the cross of St George and express patriotism, without being called a mysogynist, far right thug.
    2
  13. Don't be in any doubt, the Gaza conflict has radicalized young Muslims, the Pakistani grooming gangs scandal has put them on the front foot and the unpopularity of the Labour Party has motivated them to consolidate and define their political aspirations. They are well aware that the UK (and the West in general) is weak and divided and so they are now prepared to see what happens if they give independent political influence a try. This is highly unlikely to end well.
    2
  14. This is what all university under-graduates looked like in 1973. Until I saw the tv hosts I thought it was an archive clip of some young fogey about to join Harold Wilson's government.
    2
  15. London is great when you are a millionaire celebrity or a high earning professional. The liberal elite love it, mostly because they are largely sheltered from the reality of it. It is not so great for everyone else. Most people who live in London do not take pride in it, they do not see the area they live in as belonging to them or see their future there. They are passing through, on their way to somewhere better; somewhere less chaotic, less aggressive, quieter, more functional. Presumably they aspire to living in 'The Shire' as you put it. It seems only logical that aspirant minority groups, abitious immigrants and optimistic migrants want to get out of London too, after all, it's just as unpleasant, chaotic and dangerous for them too. Of course they would now have their eyes on areas outside of the M25 and if that is the case, why should they not 'prepare the ground'? The rest of the people living in London are those who are stuck there, through no fault of their own and are unable to find a route out. This especially applies to the white working class people who have remained despite the ‘white flight’. They are now like an embattled minority, clinging to the idea of a community that disappeared years ago, unappreciated, anachronistic and out of place. With that in mind It feels a little like capitulation, coming to the conclusion that London is lost, but equally, it’s hard not to. We have to face the facts, with four more years of Mr Khan, it is unlikely to get any better anytime soon.
    2
  16. I still can't understand how they think winning a local election in Bradford (for the Green Party?) will have any effect whatsover in the fight to 'free' Palestine. Rejecting Kier Starmer and the Labour Party for their role in the Gaza conflict seems even more irrelevant. Describing them as Zionists, after all their recent issues with anti-semitism under Corbyn, is bordering on the surreal! I suppose it simply demonstrates how deranged these people are that they think (as Greens) their primary concern is people who live thousands of miles away, not the people of Bradford. I suppose it also shows how religiously partisan the people who voted for them must be. I suppose we must now look forward to a prelonged period of sectarian division. At least the Irish people will be on our side this time.
    2
  17. Apart from the fact that the Conservative Party spent 14 years hollowing out our institutions, our economy and our culture, the Tories are unpopular because they represent the same liberal elites as those on the left. We need a political option based upon national interests not globalism and the Tories do not get that, they see it as illigitimate. They are terrified of accusations of nationalism, racism, sexism, transphobia, misogyny and patriarchy because they are playing by the radical liberal rules. That's why the ordinary people now reject them.
    2
  18. Good point. The West, particularly Britain, is fair game, after all, we are responsibile for ALL the world's ills aren't we? The J.S.O. mouthpiece on the Jeremy Vine tv show this morning admitted as much when he accidentally let it slip that Just Stop Oil are concentrating on the Anglo-sphere this summer. I wonder why? Because they wouldn't dream of protesting against the pollution produced by China, India or the Saudis because of colonialism, capitalism and 'historical exploitation' or 'oppression'. Because the world's worst polluters are absolved from guilt because of their ethnicity. But the British, their icons and institutions are asking for it, aren't they? Because we produce 1% of the global green house gas emissions, but our colonial past means we have 100% of all the white guilt! Simple.
    2
  19. This is so evil. If it is real, it pretty much amounts to a soviet style, authoritarian thought police or possibly even Gestapo tactics: grass up your neighbour when you suspect they are flirting with the wrong ideology, bring in the armed response unit to remove them for re-education and if all else fails, imprison them? Who decided County Councils should promote or encourage such dangerous restrictions on freedom of thought, expression and speech? When did that happen? Did I miss the memo? Is this Starmer's work or is it a hangover from the last shower?
    2
  20. Why are the BBC using research done by Hope Not Hate to deliberately undermine Reform candidates and their supporters? Because they are worried. They are finally beginning to see that there is a great re-set approaching. The progressive, liberal, metropolitan elite are losing their control of the narrative. Their endless virtue signalling, woke dogma and luxury opinions are simply not working any more. People are rejecting all of that stuff and the insufferable BBC progressive liberals who broadcast it. Let's start with Nick Robinson who did his disengenuous best to mischaracterise Farage and his various political positions in the recent tv interview. He tried his best to reframe various Farage quotes, he quoted Reform candidates entirely without context, he interrupted Farage's replies and denied him the time to fully defend himself by claiming "time is short". At times Robinson was both dismissive and rude and this was deliberate, not accidental and entirely pre-planned. By linking him to Trump, Truss and Putin he implied that Farage admired 'illegitimate' political figures and therefore held unacceptable opinions, making him appear toxic by association. Robinson then accused him of 'wriggling out of it' whenever Farage tried to clarify his position. In conflating immigrants with the process of immigration it was both deliberately defamatory and dishonest, by mischaracterising Farage's criticism of Sunak the explicit implication was that if Farage isn't a racist then his supporters certainly must be. So many unsubstantiated presumptions. Robinson was performative and virtue signalling, not balanced or fair. It reminded me of Maitliss vs Prince Andrew; it was intended as a political ambush. However, in this case it didn't work, it simply exposed the BBC's blatant bias against Farage, Reform and their supporters. To his credit Farage seemed to successfully deflect most of it and came away with his reputation entirely intact. The same can't be said of Robinson or the BBC, they both simply reflect the metropolitan, liberal elite's globalist agenda and the extent to which the mainstream media seeks to control the narrative. In this case it didn't work. Vote Reform and let's dismante this elitist cabal.
    2
  21. The liberal globalists in government, in the media and in our civil service know that mass immigration creates cheap labour and more demand, which is effectively a cheap fix for lack of economic growth. They will say it keeps taxes down (not true, as we all know) and of course it also provides huge demand for homes and property, which they have invested in. It also keeps rents high, which they also profit from, and it creates enough economic activity to make it seem like the GDP is going up. Of course per capita, more people sharing no extra wealth, means that we actually all worse off. Ordinary people can see this clearly, the political elites, not so much. The university educated progressives also believe that they are redressing centuries of 'white supremacy', Western colonial 'oppression' and therefore they see immigration as morally correct too. They also see immigrants as morally virtuous, like innocent children, that have to be protected by the state. Much more than the white English majority. Let's be honest, they also seem to have an ideological hatred for anything to do with the 'capitalist' Western societies. They don't mind too much if it all gets dismantled bit by bit or even ultimately destroyed. Hence the obsession with diversity, inclusion and equity. Of course, none of these elite groups really feel the social costs of mass immigration, so they can dismiss the concerns of those who do as 'racist' or 'far right'. To them it is a kind of virtuous, moral pass-time.
    2
  22. David Lammy must be squirming right now! Oh well, we can always get Dianne Abbott to take over as Foreign Secretary?
    2
  23.  @wavell14  I never said I defend Badenok, I never said Kissin was British. I support his attempts to defend British values. The more the merrier. By the way I'm much older than you think.
    2
  24. As bad as the Tories were, we all knew Labour would be worse. They will dismiss ordinary British people and seek to deny them a voice. They deny the facts, gaslight the nation by calling for telerance and diversity and then condemn the subsequent disorder. It is a recipe for disaster, just look at what happened tonight in Whitehall tonight. They want to imprison us all.
    2
  25. Is it possible that, over time, non-white, immigrant demographic groups become more conservative? Especially if successive weak, liberal governments undermine the economy, raise taxes, make the populace feel less safe, increase homelessness and crime, undermine the stability of national institutions such as the police and the judiciary? Surely even newly arrived migrants want the state to be at least functional? Or am I being naive.
    2
  26. It is really interesting when English people who grew up in the seventies or eighties talk about the Muslims they knew and grew up with. They seem to have held very different values and seem to have been much happier to integrate. Modern muslim youth is not like that, and they have no intention of trying to pretend they are. Second or third generation muslim immigrants tend to be far more radical than their parents and much more keen on a return to traditional muslim values.
    2
  27. Connor Tomlinson says what Farage doesn't dare say. Unfortunately young men like him, TR, Carl Benjamin, Calvin Robinson, Lawrence Fox etc simply get demonized, mischaracterized and smeared by the mainstream media (usually after having been targetted by Hope Not Hate) and their opinions declared illegitimate. Mathew Goodwin sums it up quite accurately in his book 'Values, Voice and Virtue'; you must have the 'correct' values otherwise you are denied a voice and potrayed as without virtue. People like Tomlinson are denied a mainstream platform in an attempt to silence them, just like the protestors after the Southport stabbings. You will not see him, or anyone like him, invited to sit opposite Ash Sarkar on the BBC's Question Time, mostly because he is a young white, English male and unapologetic about it. Farage knows this and is trying to walk the tightrope between speaking the truth and saying what the media will allow him to say. This is not the case with the European populist leaders like Kurt Wilders, they are now speaking freely. Perhaps we need things to get worse before our politicians will do the same? In the meantime we rely upon people like yourself, Douglas Murray and the Lotus Eaters.
    2
  28. Good ending to this video! Roll on the advent of the future popularist, nationalist conservative party! We just need to get through a few years of Labour making it even worse first. (It's just like waiting for viewers to get thoroughly sick of the new Doctor Who so we can all get back to someone more like Christopher Ecclestone!)
    2
  29. Good question. I think our 'conservatives' are wary of what they call 'populism' because they see it as a threat to their position of power and influence. They are right too, it is! They know that deep down they are part of the same globalist, liberal, metropolitan elite as those on the woke left and as such are a target for the populists. They are part of the establishment and have absolutely no interest in undermining that liberal consensus as it provides them with position and status. Trumpism, on the other hand, represents a rejection of that complacent conformity. He threatens to throw the liberals out of the institutions and deconstruct the places where their power hides. He reflects ordinary people's belief that the elites do not serve their interests any more, that they actually work against our communities and culture by seeking to radically alter us without our consent. He rejects their values, does not seek their approval and knows that his strength lies in the populace not the elites.
    2
  30. Yes, another example of a well loved IP getting a thorough kicking by the woke revisionists. In this case, doubling down on the franchise bashing. You didn't mention the fact that because the 're-booted' Dr Who is now mostly funded by Disney, it means Russell T Davies and the writers no longer consider themselves connected to the legacy of the intellectual property. From now on they will be free to pursue the various progressive agendas with impunity in an effort to 'reclaim' the iconic tv series. After all, they trully believe that what the world needs is for Dr Who to be 're-imagined' for 'modern audiences' and Disney will actively encourage them to do so. With Disney at the helm they will have bigger budgets and bigger audiences whatever they do, so why should they worry about what the 'conservative' traditional legacy audience thinks? Why even worry what audiences think at all, given Hollywood's current obsession with what the Critical Drinker calls 'The Message'? Going broke is not a problem as long as you are sufficiently woke, look at what they have already done to Star Wars, Marvel, Disney's own legacy IPs and even Scooby Doo! Christopher Eccleston has already distanced himself from the whole franchise, so too have fans of his and the previous incarnations. I predict that in a couple of years even Disney and the BBC will realise that they have ruined the whole thing and dump it. Then, hopefully, the traditionalists will reclaim it?
    1
  31. @jasonhaven7170  It might sound far fetched at this point but it may well emerge over the next four years that nationally Farage carries too much baggage to be elected as PM. It may become clear that voters do not want someone so divisive and so closely linked to past follies? A lot of people agree with the Reform UK stance but just can't stomach Farage. It may well become necessary to force him to move over. Just a suggestion. Personally I would prefer Rupert Lowe or even Ben Habib. Then again I would vote for Tommy if I had half a chance.
    1
  32. @jasonhaven7170  He might not get a choice. Lots of people like Reform's policies but can't stand Farage. Making him move over might be the only way to win an election and form a government?
    1
  33.  @jasonhaven7170  They will probably need another four or five million votes to get a majority. Those votes will have to come from Lib Dems and Labour as well as disgruntled Tories. I'm thinking Farage himself may be the sticking point, too much baggage? I may be wrong, let's see...
    1
  34.  @jasonhaven7170  Too much baggage to win votes off Labour and the LibDems.
    1
  35. Chritian faith is one thing but the church is another. The CoE is full of progressive 'woke' people, as evidenced by their apparent willingness to commit a billion pounds of their own money in reparation for slavery. This is despite the fact that it was Christians such as William Wilberforce and the Clapham Sect were central to stopping slavery across the British Empire. The church welcomes Muslims into its cathedrals to mark Eid and flies Islamic flags from its towers. Christian ministers allow muslim asylum seekers to pretend to convert to Christianity and then endore their fake conversions. Ministers such as Clavin Robinson are sacked for defending Christianity against the threat of Islam and progressive values. The Church of England chooses not to recognize the threat from Islam or progressivism and provides no direction except leftward, while the mosques deliberately, and much more effectively, mobilise the faithful. If Christianity is to survive in the UK, Christians need to start by reclaiming their own church.
    1
  36. Hitchens favours institutions over people, he deliberately ignores what people like Calvin Robinson and Mathew Goodwin are saying and doesn't give a toss about what people on the right are calling for. He revels in being in a party of one.
    1
  37.  wavell14  Interesting example. I don't think he's British neither does he. Read the comment above.
    1
  38.  wavell14  What is 'British'?
    1
  39.  @blank-zt6qi  What does Thomas Carlyle have to do with this?
    1
  40.  wavell14  Fair enough. What values did he support then?
    1
  41.  wavell14  Kissin is Russian. I read some Carlyle many years ago, mostly about the French Revolution. Not sure what you think his values are, that's why I asked. You are right though, what I think counts for very little in relation to other people's sense of 'Britishness' and what their values might be. I suppose the same could be said for anyone. Sorry Youtube keep deleting your comments, they delete most of mine too.
    1
  42.  wavell14  No I don't consider either of them to be British; one is Indian, the other is Nigerian. Plenty of Brits supported Franco back in the day, didn't stop them being British, it just meant they were misguided.
    1
  43.  wavell14  If you are not a fascist it doesn't necessarily follow that you are a liberal. There are other positions on the ideological spectrum for people who may just draw the line at authoritarian dictators who use state sponsored violence to suppress all opposition and to force the people to comply with the will of the state. Plus I don't like the trousers he used to wear.
    1
  44.  wavell14  Ask as many Spaniards as you can if they would like him back. See how many say yes.
    1
  45. It's ironic that Trevor Phillips, the first mainstream broadcaster to admit that Multi-culturalism wasn't working in the UK, should push back against something that is so prevalent and self evident. Radical Islamists are the minority, but every mosque reinforces the same doctrine of Wahabism and the Muslim Brotherhood and so this 'different set of values' (unlike other extreme ideologies) is being reinforced in every town on every day of the week. If Phillips no longer believes that there is an ethnic divide on values such as patriotism, he should visit a few mosques and speak to the faithful, if not their religious leaders.
    1
  46. A really good point. She either doesn't recognize it when she sees it or it is literally not there. I suspect it is the former. Out of interest, what would you say British culture is? What is it Mayor Khan has managed to undermine or minimize? What exactly has mass immigration damaged? I know what I think but I'm interested to hear from others in the Richard IV audience.
    1
  47. Excellent comment, I couldn't agree more!
    1
  48. Opposition teams think England as soft and as too woke to win...just watch, they'll all be proven right. But why should people follow a team when you can't criticize poor performances in case you upset the players, you can't complain when they take the knee, if you shout at them from the terraces and use the wrong words you get banned, corporations commercialise them and attach values you do not share, they are re-branded to represent values other than patriotism and if you suggest that sport should be free from politics you are ignored because you are ill-informed and hold the wrong opinions. Then they go to compete in Qatar and compromise all these supposed values for the sake of sponsorship. The England team, the FA and the England manager are an international joke, but don't say anything, you might upset someone with your violent 'hate speech'.
    1
  49. The second woman you featured had totally mischaracterised Farage's comments: he did not maan ALL immigrants, he did not even mean ALL religions, or all Muslims, he was talking about radical, politicised, Islamism. Hardly a new or unheard of phenomena? As you point out, no phobia there, just logical and critical analysis. Both women represent a kind of toxic femininity disguised as 'the politics of compassion'. Anyone who disagrees is 'vile' and their opinions are 'abhorent'. What does it matter if our institutions are ovewhelmed and failing as long as we show compassion to the helpless? What does it matter if the indiginous population get swamped and their culture negated as long as the oppressedbare able to get their revenge? How virtuous I am putting other people's needs before my own, oh and yours too. Forget democracy, this is the nannie's revolution.
    1
  50. Starmer hasn't inspired the left and he hasn't reassured the right. He won't unify the country, he will simply double down on the same tired old policies that divide us, impoverish us and drag us all down. It is what comes after him that interests me.
    1