Comments by "" (@TentaclePentacle) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. +Yann G Well she grow up in a communist country, and communist were dogmatically for gender equality.
    3
  2. a postmodern interpretation of accomplishment indeed.
    3
  3. These days the more I hear the left talk the more right I become. I can't stand the left anymore, but then Dave allow the right to speak, an offer up their sober views. After listening to this guy's idea, it was enjoyable, it makes me think, but after all he said, he just reminded me why I'm on the left. There is a problem with this guy's view. Charity is the safety net? But according to his world view, everyone should act on their own self interest. So if everyone is acting on self interest why should I donate to charity, how dose donating to charity help me? This whole charity being the safety net is a net full of holes, it will not catch everyone that falls. History remembers, before deposit insurance banks would fail, and people would lose their money. Some bank manage could run off with all the money and the depositors would lose. Some one spreads a rumor that this bank is going under, people would line up at the teller and demand their money, there would be a massive withdraw, and even if the bank was healthy a mere rumor of it being unhealthy would cause the bank to fail. Those cases have happened in the past. Those are the reasons why deposit insurance was introduced.
    3
  4. bitcoin cash is not just an altcoin, it is actually stealing from bitcoin in terms of it's value and brand name.
    3
  5. +tripp so the leftists are discriminatory towards dumb black people. Good to know.
    3
  6. All ancaps says you have to rely on charity. It's nothing new, its just another way of saying "tough luck, go on the street and beg".
    3
  7. Well to be fair Barbarella weren't very actiony. Neither was the character in 10,000 bc
    3
  8. This diversity quota is a deal breaker for me, everything else she stands for sounds reasonable, but when she wants a diversity quota, that's a deal breaker. Don't vote for her.
    3
  9. +spracketskooch Calling a fetus is too callous? That's an emotional response. The technical interaction between a fetus and the mother is a parasitic relationship. That's just the way it is. I do realize I'm divorcing the concept of procreation from sex. But sex doesn't necessarily have to lead to procreation. Procreation is the act of the uterus hosting an embryo. If you were to say "but the women had sex by choice so she should face the consequences". The argument is sex doesn't always lead to pregnancy. There is only a chance of pregnancy when you have sex. It's like if you know a street is dangerous, chances are if you walk down that street at night you would get robbed and murdered or raped. But if someone did choose to walk down that street knowing the dangers, and if someone did come up to that person to attack them, would that person lose the right to self defense? It's the fetus that attacks the host, just like its the criminal that attacks the person walking down that street. As for the degree of threat posed by the fetus. A pregnancy doesn't have to be life threatening that is true. But a pregnancy have the chance of becoming life threatening. A pregnancy is also 100% of the time damaging to the health of the mother. So some are damaging your health constantly, would you not have the right to remove that threat to your health? That is the basis of self defense, it is to remove a threat to your person by the least amount of force possible. By least amount of force means if it's possible to have an abortion and still keep the fetus alive, we should do that. But if it's not possible, then the rights of the host to self defense takes precedence over the fetus.
    3
  10. +Reverend Reko having an organism growing inside of you, leeching nutrients from you while providing no benefit to you. that is a parasitic relationship. The simple fact that the fetus is present within the host is an act of aggression towards the host. Just because this is the way humans procreate, doesn't change the nature of that relationship or that a fetus (a human) is leeching off the host.
    3
  11. +Deer Sakamoto everyone thinks cheap labor is a good thing, except when you are the cheap labor.
    3
  12. so bitcoin cash will win because it has a conman for a spoke person. sounds about right.
    3
  13. this guy gives off a scummy feel. If he is the spokesman for cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency is doomed.
    3
  14. what did you expect, he is in radio.
    3
  15. +Mithridate You are still getting confused on what she said. She is for psychiatry (the use of drugs) but singles out the medical doctors that over prescribe drugs. But in general she is ok with psychiatry. She said she is all for the drugs. Oh and yes I did misheard her she doesn't seem to have a problem with psychologists. But my point still stands, she is all for drug interventions. She advocates for surgery over talking, that is the dangerous. Here is an example of her being deceptive. "There is something really important for straight people to understand, no one has regret." And then in the very next sentence "the number of people that have regret is miniscule" Is the number of people who have regret miniscule? Or no one have regret? There is a contradiction right there. "B if they have regret they can change back." - That is a lie you can not change back. "change back you can't grow, a penis, well so what" She thinks having a penis is no big deal, well I'm going to tell you right now a penis is the most important organ to a man. As for abandoning her family. A man does not abandon one's family That is a societal expectation for a man. But she doesn't want to be a man anymore. I guess she can't handle the responsibility of being a man. She did abandon her family, by not wanting to be a man. The family didn't abandon her, because you can't expect any wife to stay with someone when they decided to be a different person. It's his choice to stop being a man so he abandoned his family.
    2
  16. +MunkeyChips the problem is the school system are full of those sjw teachers. They are the ones teaching our kids this none sense.
    2
  17. +Brandon S. cenk ogre did a piece on Hirsi, where he demonized her. and call her a fake.
    2
  18. +Brandon S. no he just made a video dissing her.
    2
  19. +AristedesLoL because he is the type of personality that can never admit he did something wrong.
    2
  20. Great talk, but your sound quality is atrocious.
    2
  21. If this guy had any sense, he would of imposed austerity, cut greek government spending when he got into office. That way they wouldn't have needed a second bailout. Instead he refuse to cut costs because he is a communist, he still wanted all those social programs, that forced the greek government into a situation where they needed a second bailout.
    2
  22. +John May "Vegans absolutely have the moral high ground over meat eaters." That's a ridicules argument, following that logic, not eating would be the highest moral ground one can obtain. Then everyone should just starve themselves to death.
    2
  23. its a decepticon.
    2
  24. +RavenC1357 Yeah if you put in effort into it, as in try or try harder. You can do it. This is call the human experience. Some people have to try harder than others. Life isn't' fair not everyone is born equal. There is an old saying "the stupid bird flew first". Its because the stupid bird try harder and flew before the smart ones.
    2
  25. +FrankDaTank1218 The goal post haven't change, the goal post is always that, Its inside the body feeding off the body, hence the host body gets to decide what to do with this tumor. A tumor feeds off the body just like a fetus. The women creates that life, the women can end it. There is a reason why the religious is so against abortion. Its because they think god created life and not the women, so only god can end a life. But that's not scientifically provable. Science says women created life through her own genetic materials, so a women can end it, as long as that life is feeding off the women.
    2
  26. +FrankDaTank1218 Yes the argument is its her body, and that tumor is feeding off her body. I don't care if that tumor is alive, that tumor was created by her, and she have a right to end that tumor if she choses. "thou shall not kill"? god kills all the time. sorry I don't' believe in your god and you don't get to force you god onto me. If you want a theocracy go live in a muslim world. A breastfeeding child is just like a leech, but with a breastfeeding child the mother can push that leech away from the breast and prevent feeding. With a fetus you have to cut it out if the women choses. A women creates life a women can end it, as long as its attached to her. Just like go kills all the time. The goal has never shifted, if something is feeding off of you, you can stop that feeding.
    2
  27. oh this guy is great. One of the best explainers of how a civil society should function. Dan reminds me why I'm still a liberal. Even though I hate all of those sjw, the regressive and I support trump.
    2
  28. Pakman is the king of click bait there are numerous examples in Pakman's titles where he doesn't even follow his own rules on truthfulness when it comes to titles. But Pakman's own rules on making titles are ethically questionable. Pakman will pick what's technically true, but word it in a misleading way to cause sensations. That's highly unethical, and that is the definition of click bait (a title that is designed with hints of deception to cause sensations).
    2
  29. Naive and gynocentric for a feminist that's considered to be on the good scale.
    2
  30. +Liam Smith She is a regressive, she likes the tactics of nazis and the communist who uses purges. Her words "In any transition, any time you are trying to transform an organization....is someone going to be scapegoated is someone going to be sacrificed? yeah."; She is for purges, and for scapegoats.
    2
  31. +Senad Elezovic A safety net is suppose to be safe, its not suppose to force you to beg for charity.
    2
  32. +Senad Elezovic begging is for someone who doesn't have power, while voting is for someone who has power.
    2
  33. +DJRAKKK If those are the only 2 choices america has then america is fucked. Cara is vapid, and knows no science, while Trump is a loud mouth blow hard who knows no science. I would pick Trump since none of them knows any science, might as well get some entertainment out of it.
    2
  34. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo what claims do you think he exaggerated? Everything he has said is well documented, especially the one about the rotherham rapes.
    2
  35. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo Well in Rotherham the report states about 1400 white girls were made victims, so no muslim women. And no muslim are being decapitated in UK. Context matters, he is talking about within UK, not all over the muslim world.
    2
  36. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo do know you know how tiresome it is if one is to qualify every single sentence? when people say muslim must we add the word not all? For fuck sakes context matters. One don't have to make every day speak into a law document where every thing is defined to the last letter. 
    2
  37. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo yeah he cares about what happens to Europe, because he lives in Europe, so he talks about what happens in Europe. So what. Why does he have to take on the whole world and try to fix the muslims religion. All he is trying to fix is the european attitude towards that religion. There is nothing wrong with that.
    2
  38. +Ewan Robertson its the other way around, marxism is a subset of communism. Karl Marx is a communist, so to be a marxist you are a communist.
    2
  39. +Matt James (Aviation) Its guilt by association, she says she doesn't like to use this guilty by association tactic, but she is using it none the less. Just because she sees the neo nazis supporting PEGIDA, so anything they touch must be bad. She will keep talking about how islam is the problem, but she will not do anything about it because doing something about it means joining movements like PEGIDA.
    2
  40. +Erez Why are we talking about jacklyn glenn? She has nothing to do with this video.
    2
  41. I considered the unborn baby a person. I also consider that person to be an aggressive person in active attack against the mother. That unborn person is sucking nutrients from the mother, causing the mother pain and discomfort. Risking the mother's life during the birth process. So yes that unborn child is a person, but the mother have the right to self defence against that person.
    2
  42. +Realthx its the regressive pearl clutches.
    2
  43. +Sean Thomson classical just means original, before all the progressivism seep into it. There is a lot overlap between libertarianism vs liberalism. But one fundamental difference is that libertarians have a disdain for government while the original liberals seek to create a new government out of the old monarchy, so liberals actual like government.
    2
  44. +Sean Thomson did you just use an economic philosophy to describe liberalism? Liberalism is philosophy about how to govern, how a society should function. Sure economics is part of governance, part of society, but its not the only thing. This is the problem I have with you libertarians. You have blinders on, all you see is the free market, the holy market. The market is not the end all and be all of society. Liberals understand that, libertarians don't.
    2
  45. +Sean Thomson The magna carta is about individual rights, its about what a king may, or may not do to a subject. The regressive left believes in group rights not individual rights. The regressive left is perfectly happy to use the state to crush individual rights. So no the regressive left don't support the magna carta. And you are correct about western culture and philosophy, at least what can be considered the modern west is based on liberalism. On the difference between what separates a libertarian and a classical liberal. I have already told you, libertarians have a disdain for government, while liberals love government, they want to improve it. Hence the transition from monarchy to a democracy. A libertarian would like to opt out of government, they believe taxation is theft, while a liberal does not. A libertarian believes you are born with certain rights. A liberal position is that your rights are given to you by a government. That is why they forced king John to sign the magna carta, guaranteeing those rights. I have watched Sargon's debate with libertarians on the issue of rights, Sargon intuitively understands this, but he couldn't quiet spell it out, to put it in those words. That's why Sargon have so much trouble distinguishing himself with librarians. I believe that inability to think of rights as given to you by the government is a relic and hold back from a religious backgrounds for most of the western liberals. Most of those early liberals are christians after all. They think of rights as something god given, but in reality rights are given to you by the state, or society at large.
    2
  46. +Petra Maier Well this is how Hitler comes to power. The left makes a mess of things, and someone like Hitler comes in. It is going to be scary.
    2
  47. +Petra Maier Well Hitler is a leftist by today's standard, but back then he is considered right because he was fighting an even bigger leftist, which are the communists.
    2
  48. +Dionys84 He had 1 job when he was in office, and that was to cut cost. He refused to do it, thus forcing greece to take another bailout loan. He dug the hole deeper for greeks, and that's why he is hiding out in UK right now, telling brits to vote remain, while telling greece to leave. He is a hypocrite.
    2
  49. +godwings101 by that logic trump could have other people, people more qualified to run the country. So all that rhetoric about how trump don't know what he is doing goes all out the window. At the end of the day Hillary still can't be trust, and trump have vowed to stop TPP. That's something Hillary refuse to do.
    2
  50. +godwings101 at least trump is against it, while hillary says she is against it but then do everything in her power to pass it. That kind of shameless lie is the hall mark if hillary. So who can you trust, trump the idiot or hillary the conniving witch.
    2