Comments by "pinball1970" (@pinball1970) on "World Science Festival" channel.

  1.  @gabepearson6104  Local floods yes. How does original sin fit in with Evolution? If there is no original sin we don't need Jesus. Not that Jesus ever intended to get crucified. That was not the plan.
    1
  2.  @kevinmorgan_truth  I don't think you understand what he said
    1
  3.  @Berjayacair  I don't think the test is robust, both the Bible and Koran are very prescriptive so asking a random question could get answered in a round about way. The Bible is much larger than the Koran (the NT is larger than the Koran) and has a lot of history so you are much likely to hit on a completely irrelevant verse.
    1
  4.  @Berjayacair  You claim you have a method to find god, we point out the flaws you post 'Why should I care?' If you don't want feedback on your method don't post it on a public forum.
    1
  5.  @Berjayacair  The reason I know the test would not work is because I have read the Bible and the Koran. The reason I know the Koran is made up I because I have read the history of the Bible on which it is derived.
    1
  6.  @Berjayacair  I have a copy at home. What questions should I ask? How about how should i treat nonbelievers? I will ask that. Every other verse has something to say on that, give you a fighting chance?
    1
  7.  @monotheist..  <---------another sock puppet. IGNORE
    1
  8.  @monotheist..  I am reporting you every time I see you now you idiot
    1
  9.  @mekizable  There are no evolutionary states. Do you have kids? Are the identical to you? Or a combination of you and your husband/partner? That is step one. Second, individuals do not evolve, populations do. This is not as obvious in terms of what happens over time. I can give you a few pointers though, are you studying Biology?
    1
  10.  @shanginadildo  No so you would notice, try entering a few numbers using the Lorenz transform. The results are tiny. If you spent the rest of your life on a jumbo jet at 500 miles per hour?
    1
  11. @Gerald Dixon Cummings No, significant % could produce significant results. Of course having mass he could never achieve c in any sort of vessel, present or future.
    1
  12.  @maximilian6830  can you let me know where Dawkins has been 'left behind?'
    1
  13.  @maximilian6830  Examples?
    1
  14.  @iain5615  What you have posted is incoherent unscientific nonsense. Please cite papers disproving 1/Common ancestry 2/Natural selection
    1
  15.  @iain5615  50% of papers?? Are you just making this up?
    1
  16.  @iain5615  No, I asked you a question. Just outline the issue in your own words otherwise I will just think you are just another creationist liar. There is no issue with common ancestry
    1
  17.  @iain5615  Er....yeah you have a poor understanding of the theory. Abiogenesis? Epigenetics? Do you know what these things are?
    1
  18.  @maximilian6830  Waterborne is completely clueless
    1
  19.  @sunder3339  Richard Dawkins not even 'remotely smart?' Baliol, doctorate, chair, Royal society and Royal society of literature........yeah what a dumb ass.
    1
  20.  @sunder3339  Can you try and make at least some sense? How is getting into Baliol 'paradoxical?' Or getting into the RS? You do know what these organisations are right?
    1
  21.  @sunder3339  Evolution is a fact, it is a mountain of facts/data in fact and the Theory of Evolution explains those facts. This is established Science, I have no idea what you are talking about. Have you debunked QM too?
    1
  22.  @sunder3339  Carbon dating now? We yeah clearly you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are just throwing a few terms around. Get a basic science book read it then ask some intelligent questions, if you can. I would aim at 13-15 years Ish.
    1
  23.  @sunder3339  Perhaps 8-10 yrs
    1
  24.  @sunder3339  Hell?? Do you believe any superstitious unscientific tribal nonsense You are told? How gullible are you?
    1
  25.  @sunder3339  You have zero, 'proof.'
    1
  26.  @davewalt1781  They don't look lost, what truth are you referring to? Rules for slavery and the rape and murder of children?
    1
  27.  @davewalt1781  Your god ORDERED the killing of babies, it's in the OT.
    1
  28.  @davewalt1781  Killing babies is absolutely ok with Yhwh
    1
  29.  @davewalt1781  So killing babies is ok then?
    1
  30.  @davewalt1781  So you are telling me you KNOW what god likes and dislikes?
    1
  31.  @davewalt1781  Liberals killing unborn babies is bad? Ok, but killing actual live babies, infants and children is ok? Just so I am getting this straight.
    1
  32.  @davewalt1781  The NT is based on human sacrifice which I also find abhorrent
    1
  33.  @davewalt1781  Yhwh ORDERED the murder of children.
    1
  34.  @davewalt1781  Threats may work on children your usual targets for indoctrination but not on educated intelligent people like me. Now answer the question, is killing babies ok as ordered by Yhwh in the OT ok or not? Just answer the question, it's quite simple. Yes or no?
    1
  35.  @davewalt1781  That's fine we eventually got there, you think killing babies is ok. Would you do that? What about the babies of the Nazis, did they deserve to die? Should the Nuremberg trials included wives and babies of the SS? What about the rape of children in the OT? Is that ok too?
    1
  36.  @davewalt1781  Of course I don't doubt god, how do you doubt something that does not exist?
    1
  37.  @davewalt1781  Yes, abortion is a woman's right. Am ok with it? Of course not, no one is, it should be an absolute last resort.
    1
  38.  @davewalt1781  I don't need to twist anything the words are explicit, do you need quotes? Context???? In what context is the rape and the murder of children ok?
    1
  39.  @davewalt1781  I know I didn't, im just REJECTING your evidence. You do realise how claims and burden of proof works right?
    1
  40.  @davewalt1781  Yes you have already told me you approve of killing babies we have moved on. Yes Joshua was ORDERED to wipe out a town and take the virgin girls as plunder. Do I need to spell it out to you?
    1
  41.  @davewalt1781  I am evil? I just abhor the murder and rape in the Bible is all. Shall we talk slavery next? Exodus 21?
    1
  42.  @davewalt1781  Evidence is Numbers 31:18
    1
  43.  @davewalt1781  Satan, Sat-an in ancient Hebrew did NOT mean devil this is yet another ignorant comment from you. It was never a being, it was a TYPE of person. An accuser.
    1
  44.  @davewalt1781  The devil thing came from Greek thinking, same as heaven and hell. You did not comment on Numbers 31 18 or Exodus 21. You also said 'I am sick of your lies.' If you can point those out I would appreciate it. I AGREE with abortion, killing babies while they slumber in the womb. This to me is horrible, a last resort but a woman's right, I am a father just so you know.
    1
  45.  @davewalt1781  I did not say Satan was from Greek I said the idea of heaven and Hell. The Devil came much later and is NOT mentioned in the OT and s influenced by Greco Roman thinking and apocalyptic thinking, Satan is in the OT but that is not the devil.
    1
  46.  @davewalt1781  That was a serpent not the devil. The ancient Hebrews did not think like that, no soul heaven or hell. Read 'Heaven and Hell' Bart Ehrman
    1
  47.  @davewalt1781  Yes I have read the NT. Some messages of love and kin ship there
    1
  48.  @davewalt1781  You know that some early Christians thought there were two gods? That was because the god of the OT was so destructive and wrathful. Evil in fact they did not have him in the same bag as Jesus.
    1
  49.  @davewalt1781  Glad they were slaves? Exodus 21 gives rules on how to beat ones slave. Apparently you are allowed to beat them so badly that they die after a few days but NOT the same day. Read it and feed back
    1
  50.  @davewalt1781  Look Dave you are making your own scholarship, Sa-tan MEANS adversary or accuser in ancient Hebrew. That is what the word means. It's that simple.
    1