Comments by "pinball1970" (@pinball1970) on "World Science Festival" channel.

  1.  Maw 3615054  No. That is not what the theory is at all. I can explain the science to you. Can you please answer my question. What did your creator create? Can we start with the largest part of our solar system? Our very own star?
    1
  2.  Maw 3615054  Stars are not created, they form via well documented verified Science.
    1
  3.  Maw 3615054  What do you think Evolution is? What you have posted about Evolution is unscientific nonsense. Seriously.
    1
  4.  Maw 3615054  Well it's a bit more than that, have you been following COVID19 variants ? Have you seen it's evolution tree?
    1
  5.  Maw 3615054  Evolution is the changes in the gene frequency over time in a population. There is a stack of other details but that is the core. COVID19 since the outbreaks has now had mutations to the genes that code for its protein coat. Nice catch on the bats though! Yhwh got something right!
    1
  6.  @rodt9779  Why are you asking that same question about dinosaur flesh months later. I already told you those studies were either debunked or no repeated ie FAKE. IF there is a peer reviewed paper then ask about it on physics forums like a suggested. You didn't, you could have but decided not to. Why?
    1
  7.  @rodt9779  I told you ten times that there professional scientists on there who could answer you question, chemists, biologists, molecular biologists and earth scientists. You are dishonest.
    1
  8.  @rodt9779  NDEs are ubiquitous in that they are cultural is from inside not outside.
    1
  9.  @rodt9779  Blind people can still make up images based on stories, they still know what arms legs trees and the wind is
    1
  10.  @rodt9779  How do you know they don't? What studies have you read?
    1
  11.  @ScottHarness1  Evolution does not work on chance
    1
  12.  @rodt9779  Is it from a respected journal?
    1
  13.  @rodt9779  Ok forward the citation
    1
  14.  @rodt9779  I can't see them, tell me what to Google
    1
  15.  @davidbanner6230  Consciousness is part of the brain for me nothing more but the jury is out
    1
  16.  @asadalam1919  Yes Dawkins books changed the way I think. Amazing
    1
  17.  @seethelight657  Well you are asking all the big questions.
    1
  18.  @rodt9779  Have you read any of the references I gave you?
    1
  19.  @rodt9779  Yes they are all there and you have about 6 months. You have also been on physics forums and not asked anything. So my conclusion is that you do not want answers or intelligent debate, you want validation.
    1
  20.  @rodt9779  They were not links. You are clueless on Evolution, it's that simple. Pretty much everything you posted illustrated that. Matt Ridley - Evolution. Read it.
    1
  21.  @rodt9779  You are just repeating the same unscientific backward creationist nonsense that you posted a year ago. READ a textbook on the subject. I have given you one. Matt Ridley, Evolution. Read it.
    1
  22.  @rodt9779  Rod, you are completely clueless regarding biology and Evolution. I don't know why that is. My 9 year old niece had a better understanding. This is not an insult, this is a years worth of back and forth. It is my life advice to you. Last chance. The Selfish Gene 1976 Richard Dawkins The Blind Watch Maker 1986 Richard Dawkins Read them in order, those books will answer all your questions.
    1
  23.  @rodt9779  Rod, nothing and I mean absolutely nothing you have posted has any credibility. I did not spend 4 years at university to refute nonsense. It is unscientific creationist clap trap. READ the basics FIRST. THEN try Dawkins then Ridley. Then look at some of the published literature on genomics.
    1
  24.  Francisco Nieves  Lying about what?
    1
  25.  @rodt9779  You are clearly not interested in Science at all.
    1
  26.  @rodt9779  It's been refuted, just Google it.
    1
  27.  @gabrielbrewster107  What about it? What do you think the BB describes?
    1
  28.  @gabrielbrewster107  No it doesn't if you are talking about T=0. BB theory is silent on that. There are models that suggest the universe IS eternal. Others that suggest it is cyclic. BB describes the expansion from an initial configuration but not where or how it came about or what came before if there was a before.
    1
  29.  @rodt9779  Why do I need to refute creationist garbage? I refuted all your silly claims a year ago. I am not repeating.
    1
  30.  @gabrielbrewster107  More accurately, the BB theory describes the rapid expansion of a region of space that was much hotter and denser than it is today. There are a few key points. Hubble's law, observations and red shift. CMBR and the v small differences that explains our 'lumpy' universe. Star formation, the elements. Prediction of H He. Shape of the universe the cosmological constant and dark matter. It's pretty out there stuff! All good tho, the ultimate questions!
    1
  31.  @matthewgoddard5088  Are you a cosmologist?
    1
  32.  @matthewgoddard5088  There ARE models that are eternal. Read about them
    1
  33.  @matthewgoddard5088  Penrose for instance
    1
  34.  @matthewgoddard5088  Why are you lying? Nothing has been proven at all.
    1
  35.  @Tzimiskes3506  If you are not a cosmologist why would you state that?
    1
  36.  @Tzimiskes3506  Our universe, the observable universe has a beginning. Yeah sure but that universe may have expanded from an infinite region of space time. They don't know.
    1
  37.  @Tzimiskes3506  Some models are eternal. Check out Turok, Penrose, Guth
    1
  38.  @Tzimiskes3506  let me know if the link works
    1
  39.  @Tzimiskes3506  You get the links?
    1
  40.  @affanrana8468  I did not say that, this is what some cosmologists are saying. Some models have an eternal infinite universe. They do not all agree on it, that was my point.
    1
  41. what do you mean by 'structure of the universe?'
    1
  42.  @affanrana8468  The rest you posted has no basis whatsoever in Science
    1
  43.  @gabepearson6104  Yeah and religions have had zero to contribute to cosmology. For centuries.
    1
  44.  @gabepearson6104  So which religious creation story ties in with modern cosmology?
    1
  45.  @gabepearson6104  Eternally spatially? I will read it again I don't think it specifies. Water and light don't fit though. Very little does as it is very geocentric which is what you would expect as it was conceived by humans!
    1
  46.  @gabepearson6104  The Bible DOES make claims that are clearly not true. The Bible had many authors most of those unknown and the books were written over many centuries.
    1
  47.  @gabepearson6104  The subject is Bible claims. The claims in Genesis are easily debunked.
    1
  48.  @gabepearson6104  Which parts are?
    1
  49.  @gabepearson6104  Ok so we can dispense with the creation, Adam and Eve and the global flood. What about Moses and the Exodus out of Egypt?
    1
  50.  @gabepearson6104  There was no 'first' humans so if Adam Eve were people they were part of a tribe. There is no evidence of any of the patriarchs and the flood was taken from the Gilgamesh story. The Exodus not only did not happen it could not have happened. No archaeology to support it either.
    1