Comments by "Khronogi" (@Khronogi) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. ​ @joshsmith8715 John, save this comment for when he does the things he said he would and ran on.
    17
  2. I've given thoughts to this as well, and it might actually be trumps plan here. What better way to bolster support than by starting a war, and if you are trying to push the fact that you are anti-war, then you need someone to start a war against you. I think the president is hoping that people escalate and attack the federal troops so he can justify himself and escalate even farther, and might fortify his position as being the person who can bring this to an end, ie protect the citizens. He will say the liberals and democrats dont care about security and will say that biden wont be able to or wont be willing to stop the violent rioters. trumps current advertising spending suggests this as well, as I think $20million was spent on his 'defund the police' ads. He's fear-mongering as an attempt to drive the insecure towards him. You can see this in his supporters in these threads. A lot of them are justifying the feds being there because 'the liberals wont do anything against the violent hordes.' We know this line to be wrong on several levels. We know that the majority of the protestors are not violent, and only a very small number of them are. Yet we still see people calling them riots. Yes, people have caused property damage, and some have broken into stores to steal stuff amongst the confusion. A smart person would coordinate /WITH/ the protestors and make arrangements for bad actors, while also supporting the protest. My city, while it didn't deal with everything perfectly, made the judgment not to make arrests the night its' stores were broken into. Why? Because they had thousands of videos of the people doing these things, and decided to pursue arrests after the case. Instead, on the night this happened, they moved people away from the affected areas and allowed them to protest through the night. The following nights the police had already established fences in the area and even talked to protestors who were there. The president is absolutely horrible at pr, even if he pretends to be great with getting attention. Not to mention he's horrible at actually leading. One thing I've noticed is that the president likes to create a problem so he can 'fix' it. He enraged north korea so he could 'calm them down'. He broke the Iran nuclear deal so he could say Iran is dangerous and making nukes. He created a trade war so he could 'fix' it.
    17
  3. That's great until you realize we have billions of classified documents.
    17
  4. ​​ @jackmurphy8635 kinda disingenuous to not comment on the actual rest of the argument there buddy. Why are we not providing the same level of scrutiny to the president of the United states (which you've pointed out is a huge deal)
    17
  5. ​ @tatsuothefamiliar3801 gun safety ain't law cause that would be infringing on the 2nd amendment.
    16
  6. ​ @xvince2002 "weaponizatipnf of humanity and inclusivity" You mean we dislike bigotry?
    16
  7. ​ @michaeljorgensen790 His signature was the one that granted access to the capital grounds. He was told time and time again what people were planning on doing. He knew they were armed, he said the arms weren't for him. He told security to remove the metal detectors so that they could keep their arms. He gaslit those people for months telling them that the election was stolen, that they needed to fight for their country, that their freedom was being taken away. He sent them to the capital building (remember, he's directly the one who signed the paper to allow them to be there, when the protest originally was meant to only be at the memorial). And on tip of that he also attempted insurrection with the false electors.
    16
  8. ​ @Devixicus  because of how bad their social policy was?
    15
  9. ​ @ErikDayne then went on to do the exact opposite under trump.
    15
  10. ​​ @212caboose  When you teach the youth to think critically, they tend to critically think. And that tends to see through corruption pretty fast.
    15
  11.  @ZombiZohm  video just said that could be pinging off 2nd to last tower in the chain and not current tower.
    15
  12.  @theMosen  Screwed up the impeachment? The republicans decided he was to be acquitted before they event drew up the impeachment.
    15
  13. ​ @Avogadros_number its a pretty cool argument to say "im right you are wrong, you find the proof, peace out."
    13
  14. ​ @dstinnettmusic  we can say a bunch of people are billionaires because they own public stock worth billions of dollars.
    13
  15.  @lakshen47  except the former president was actually doing the things Christy said, while the current is only doing them in the minds of those who says he is doing them. Current worst thing about Biden is his consist stance on coming together with people who do not want to come together. Grow some oves biden. Oh, and he sounds like hes about to fall asleep in his speeches, but that one I'm okay with.
    13
  16.  @VadulTharys  so you admit to him doing it? You just dont care? And by the way, ignorance does not justify breaking the law. If anything, it shows another reason why the guy is unqualified for his position.
    13
  17.  @MrTaint  This is not true at all.
    13
  18.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  is a warning shot less illegal than shooting someone? I'd say it is.
    12
  19.  @Freakazoid12345  ah yes, punish those who have sex. Why
    12
  20.  @triparadox.c  The conservative lawmakers in this country are garbage. My state senator Ron Johnson wants to privatize all the schools in the state, which would shut down all the rural schools in the state, and he told that idea to a hall full of public school teachers. Dude is a flat out idiot. The senate just passed legislation reinstating restrictions on the oil and gas industry. The conservative lawmakers (Who get money from the oil and gas industry mind you) were completely against this bill, even though the oil and gas companies themselves were in support of it. That is insanity. The liberals play games too, but the conservatives lawmakers in the country are actively acting against their own country. They continue to deny giving representation to it's citizens, they are actively undermining the right to vote, and they are scapegoating their asses off while doing so. They purposely do not do their jobs, and they purposely sabotage the government so that they can say the government doesn't work. Denying representation? Denying voting? Trying to overturn an election? Sabotaging the country? That doesn't sound American at all. You can be conservative all you like, that's fine, but your representatives are straight trash.
    12
  21.  @osmosisjones4912  Attacking the judge's family is "telling the truth"?
    12
  22. Consequences cause he defrauded the rich
    11
  23.  @phillipvandyke3887  that's probably the point, like those Baptist church people
    11
  24.  @TheTyrial86  No, being a neo nazi makes you a neo nazi. Wearing shit like '6 million weren't enough' makes you a neo nazi.
    11
  25.  @danceswithdirt7197  I didnt delete it, I just stopped my sub.
    11
  26. ​ @elisabethheiman2104  It boggles my Christian mother's mind how people can state they are Christian and then support a person and party who are antithetical to Jesus' teachings.
    11
  27.  @R1ckr011  I like to call facism extreme authoritarianism, and I personally think authoritarianism has been the most dangerous form of government in existence.
    11
  28. ​ @hollandanish5557 by what means tho? The reason calorado can do it is because trump enaged in insurrection.
    10
  29. I don't even think if he straight said what he meant, "i Like what you did, but you need to stop, or else bad things will happen to me" it would be illegal.
    10
  30.  @blusafe1  How associated with cancer? Because the sun is also associated with cancer and we don't shame people for walking in it.
    10
  31.  @jintsuubest9331  so? Put them in jail too.
    10
  32.  @TorquemadaTwist  It actually does stand for The Learning Channel. Used to have some kids programs in the early morning and some other types during the day. The executives decided to turn the entire thing into reality because it makes more money.
    10
  33.  @mnxs Brother, *feminism* is just about having equality. If you are struggling to identify with that, you've got to reevaluate yourself. Now, some feminist organizations or members, then yeah. I've definittelyy seen people misrepresent what feminism is or even pass feminism and get into some kind of nonequal movement. Anyways, keep calling yourself a feminist and defend that stance. It's an important thing to distinguish and we should never stop doing doing it. Don't leave an opportunity to correct the disinformation flow. So basically: If you calling yourself a feminist around your circles is alienating you. Your circle needs to understand what feminism is and isn't, you don't need to stop identifying as one.
    10
  34.  @malice6081  I feel like this would be illegal too
    9
  35.  @mtavarez4561  refer to video, also please stop formatting your comments like that, it is entirely annoying. Also If you Could Stop insulting everyone
    9
  36. justaperson & the Lost Farmstead You two have to realize that he is not being impeached because of who he is, he is being impeached for what he has done. If Hillary was elected president and she did the same things, I would want her impeached as well. The political ideology is not the reason the president is being impeached. You must also realize that this is not a 'team battle', it is not Republican vs Democrat, it is not Liberal vs Conservative. That style of thinking is not only incredibly disruptive to our democracy, it is also straight out of the Russian playbook. If you cannot defeat your enemy, you make them defeat themselves. Remember the pledge of allegiance, 'United we stand, divided we fall.' That is still a thing. Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, Conservatives, and everyone else are on the same team. Please do not let anyone distract you from that fact. Anyone who does is goading you. So we can analyze the /facts/, and yes they are facts. This isn't a case of people making up sensationalist headlines in order to generate views. These facts have been corroborated by government officials and the Whitehouse itself. Fact: The President of the United States of America sought to use congressionally approved money and resources in order to make the President of Ukraine launch an investigation into his political rival. The 'transcript' released by the Whitehouse shows the conversation in which the President essentially attempts to extort Ukraine into investigating his political rival. The sheer act of him ASKING Ukraine to do such a thing is against the law. Using congressional money as leverage is just another nail in the coffin. Fact: The President has continually obstructed the investigation into these events. (This is illegal) Fact: The President has intimidated witnesses of the investigation. (This is illegal) Fact: The President has admitted that he would use foreign nations in order to gain potential dirt on political rivals. (Doing so is illegal) These are all facts, they aren't there to be argued about. These things happened, we know they happened. The President is showing us that he believes that is he above the law. The question becomes now: Are these things allowable for a President to do? Is the President above the law? What do we do if the President does something he absolutely should not be doing? So if you think about it this way, instead of believing that people want the president impeached because they disagree with his policies, you can now start to believe that people want him impeached because he has betrayed America. Also, keep in mind, this doesn't even approach all of the other misconduct the man has done throughout his life, nor the rest of his presidency. So my question to both of you (and anyone else that still supports the president) would be: Do you think the President should be above the law? And if you do: Do you realize that makes him a dictator?
    9
  37.  @kw5371  eh. I think you are failing to see our issue. If you drew a system around just dude and the people chasing him, you can probably argue self defense in that isolated circumstance. I dont think any one would reasonably disagree with that. However you cant judge the situation isolated because you dont have all the facts. We in the left have an issue with the argument being self defense because the guy knew fully well what could happen was a very real possibility. We dont think going out of your way to get into such a situation can be called self defense if you knew it would happen in advance. Open carrying a weapon on the street is legal. Its also incredibly weird and so seldom done in a city street that people see it as threatening. The sheer fact he was carrying a gun is seen as a threat to the people around him. Theres also the fact that this kid doesnt always open carry to every place he goes to. He chose to open carry to this specific place. Why? Why choose this specific place to open carry to and not everywhere you go like someone should if they are in compliance with concealed carry? He decided to bring a firearm ti this specific event. Why did he bring a firearm? He said he thought it looked cool. If it was about looking cool, then why was the firearm loaded? Because it wasnt about looking cool. He brought a LOADED firearm to the event because he knew it was going to be dangerous. The news in wisconsin was also telling people it was going to be dangerous. The curfew set in place was telling people to go home. Still he remained with his loaded firearm even though he had been warned multiple times and knew fully well the situation is going to be dangerous. If you know fully well a situation is dangerous and you put yourself into that situation, that isnt self defense when something goes wrong. That is akin to driving into a hurricane and asking your insurance to payout accidental wind damage. That wasnt an accident, you drove into a hurricane.
    9
  38. Honestly, we should be suppressing any thoughts about violence right now. We need to remain peaceful, else we play into the president's plans. He WANTS us to be violent, so he can support his claims. So as for now, peace is the answer.
    9
  39.  @bioswat96  What crimes would you charge the current president with?
    9
  40. ​ @NichoTBE biden wouldn't do it because he's a nice guy.
    9
  41.  @rangerrecon  are you defending this? We should change the things we dislike. Not just accept that they are there.
    8
  42.  @pwrserge83  so why didnt he use official channels?
    8
  43.  @albaniaalban  idk folk, I understand the stigma against mental health and such but actively not taking the medicine to help that is making me think it's an accurate term. If it was treated and he still acted like that then sure.
    8
  44.  @ichirocharles1  He's not saying it was specifically planned, he's saying it was being built by continually fanning flames and lying to a group of people every day of their lives.
    8
  45. Did he say he was jtac?
    8
  46.  @blackbird7781  the term African american meaning black and the term African American being an american from africa are both correct. I'm aware that white people love to state they are south african (using the second defnition) in order to make fun if the first term.
    8
  47. Yet
    7
  48.  @lscizml  whats the source for that
    7
  49.  @maccurtis730  the democrats were actually the ones trying to define ahead of time what the money could be used for rather than having s trillion dollars of undefined funds just sitting there. The Republicans just wanted to rush through a bill and then end up with a slush fund where they could pocket it. Democrats dont want to just give money away to people who dint deserve it. They DO want to have oversight to stop people from abusing services.
    7
  50. ​ @binbashbuddy  The president released the document that proved he did was he was impeached for. Are we saying that the president's own released document isn't good evidence?
    7