Comments by "Khronogi" (@Khronogi) on "LegalEagle"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Dakota Keeler the problem with this is that congress did give them the power, its vague on purpose.
I dont know if I can put this in words on a cell phone but I'll try.
The reason we have these various governmental organizations is because congress cant do everything by themselves. They are both not experts in every field nor are they physically capable of handling every decision on every subject in any amount of time.
So they say, "hey we aren't experts, but you know who is? People who have dedicated their entire lives to this subject, let's have them in charge." And they create a governmental agency to take care of it. They say they have power to do stuff, and it isnt explicitly mentioned because the whole point of creating the agency was because congress cant know what to explicitly mention, nor can predict the future.
That built in vagueness is on purpose, because without it, Congress would have to become experts in the subject they are creating, and build the framework and structure themselves. That is not possible.
Also, SCOTUS has terrible logic for their decision. "If congress doesnt explicitly mention it then they cant do it" well I can argue the exact opposite and say "congress didnt explicitly mention they couldnt, so they can". Neither of those is a good arguement.
The fact is those governmental agencies have oversight that judges whether their actions are in line. If they were out of line theyd be told they were out of line.
SCOTUS just wants to do the federalist societies end goal of breaking the government, which this type of ruling does.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3