Comments by "Ace1000ks1975" (@Ace1000ks19751982) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. This battle is like the Battle of Kursk. The Ukrainians were waiting for their miracle weapons, like the Leopard 2 MBTs, Challengers, M1A1s, M2 Bradley AIFVs, and Marder 1 AIFVs to turn the tide. Just like Hitler was waiting for the Panther and Tiger tanks to run over the Russians in the Battle of Kursk. Looks like those weapons didn't turn the tide for Hitler or the Ukrainians.
    385
  2. This reminds me of the Janissary Mutiny of 1826. The Janissary corp believed they would be replaced by the modern Ottoman Army, so they started a mutiny against the Sultan. Their mutiny failed, and the Janissary Corp was disbanded.
    226
  3. In war, you have to keep your enemies guessing on where you plan to attack. This way, you have a better chance of making a breakthrough.
    56
  4. China can wait more than 5 years, the longer they want the more powerful they will get. They will only have more ships, more aircraft, and more military equipment. The Chinese economy isn't fully geared up for a war economy, and when it is they can simply overwhelm them. Formosa is part of China, and it has always been.
    29
  5. The Nazis tried in the Battle of the Buldge, and they got decimated.
    20
  6.  @hasithakumarasiri8343  Your mother?
    16
  7. Looks like drones are the perfect weapon system to conduct stealth operations.
    8
  8. You remember Delta Force (1986) when Chuck Norris used his specialized motorcycle.
    8
  9.  @AllBackToOne  The Russian defense ministry was going to dissolve Wagner on July 1st, 2023. The head of Wagner saw this as a threat, like the Janissary corp saw this as a threat. It happened a lot in history. You had the Satsuma Revolt of 1877, because the Samurai lost all their privileges due to the new government coming into power. The government had a modernized army instead of a feudal army which didn't require the services of the Samurai or the Janissary corps. As the Russia army got more and more effective, they didn't need Wagner anymore. I guess the head of Wagner saw this as a threat.
    6
  10. I prefer Bach. LOL
    6
  11. I think Ukraine wasted a lot of resources in Bakhmut. I doubt they have enough resources to pull off a successful offensive. Pulling off an offensive without having air superiority is a disaster waiting to happen.
    4
  12.  @philiprufus4427  If you believe in the cause so much, go sign up as a mercenary for the Ukrainian army.
    4
  13. I don't think Russia has to negotiate, because the US doesn't have anything to offer. Trump said, he would stop sending aid, so Russia could just continue to do what it is doing. Russia could decide when to end it.
    4
  14. Tanks will continue to be used in combine arms tactics.
    3
  15. The war between Russia and the Ukraine is like the American Civil W-ar. At the beginning, the South was winning a lot of battles, but they lost because they didn't have the industrial might of the North.
    3
  16. The MM makes up stuff, and this is why I don't watch them anymore.
    3
  17. How many of those elite Ukrainian units exist after this battle? LOL
    3
  18. Now we know why Nato and the US are sending armored vehicles, like M2 Bradley AIFVs, Challenger 2 MBTs, M1A2 MBTs, and Leopard 2 MBTs. If Ukraine was doing so well then they wouldn't need this kind of support. Former Warsaw Pact countries in Eastern Europe sent hundreds of T-72 variants to the Ukraine already, so I can safely assume most of those were destroyed or heavily damaged. They are also running out of parts for those vehicles. Without maintenance, you can't keep tanks and armored vehicles in working condition.
    3
  19. Assaulting with infantry and artillery, looks like World War 1 tactics used in a 21st century battlefield. In WW1, they didn't have drone spotters, aircraft that could drop thousands of kgs of bombs, attack helicopters, and attack drones. The defenders clearly have the advantage here.
    2
  20. Maybe, they just let it happen, so they can get the excuse to wipe out the Palestinians.
    2
  21. The US is good at using the media as a propaganda tool(lying), and printing money. Putin is right, the West is an EMPIRE OF LIES. 😆
    2
  22. The Battle of the Bulge was a good example of an army attacking without air superiority. How did that go for the Germans in early 1945?
    2
  23. This is interesting, we will see what happens in the next few months.
    2
  24. Lots of people die in war especially when your country is the battlefield. Just look at the Korean War, and the Vietnam War for example. Most of the casualties in those wars were South Korean soldiers and South Vietnamese soldiers much more than US losses.
    2
  25. The Ukrainians can't mount any major offensive against the Russians without air superiority, air support, and more artillery pieces. Attacking without those 3 things is suicidal.
    1
  26. Republicans aren't known for being smart, they are known to be racist.
    1
  27. Are they going to send M1A1 Abrams, Leopard 1s, Leopard 2A4s, AMX-13s, AMX-30s, Chieftain mbts, and Challenger 1s if this fails?
    1
  28. Looks like Russia has to capture Odessa, and all the coastline of the Ukraine. Turn Ukraine into a landlocked country, so they cannot attack Russian sea assets.
    1
  29.  @bonafidehater692  Sure hitler.
    1
  30.  @elmersbalm5219  It worked on D-Day in World War 2 when the Allies tricked the Germans on where they were actually going to make the D-Day landing.
    1
  31.  @fjodorcornelisson6874  It's like investing. If you invest in anything first then you are the winner. You can sell those assets at a higher price, and make the highest profits. If you saw the potential for the internet back in the early 1990s, and invested in all the companies that reaped the rewards of the internet revolution then you would be rich. If you try to buy those stocks after those assets went up then its too late.
    1
  32.  @chriswong9158  That is true, but armies do use decoys and prop equipment.
    1
  33.  @alinonymous  It doesn't matter where it maybe, all the strategic positions are heavily reinforced with Russian reinforcements. It won't be like the Kharkiv offensive.
    1
  34. We can call this the Ukrainian battle of the Kursk. The Ukrainians being the Nazis.
    1
  35.  @danielpetrucci8952  In the beginning of the battle, the Allies couldn't use their air power due to bad weather conditions. When the weather started to clear up, the Germans had a real problem on their hands.
    1
  36. Hannibal wasn't b l a c k, he was a Lebanese.
    1
  37.  @russianinvader3207  Yes, the Russian army has gotten more effective. They dug in and made multi layer defensive positions. Let the Ukrainian army attack without air support, and inflicted heavy losses. The Russia army doesn't have to play into the strengths of the Ukrainian army. They can simply fight the war that it wants to fight. The point of the Russian invasion was to de militarize the Ukraine. If the Ukrainians try to attack, they will concentrate their forces. Russian drones can spot them, shell them, use air strikes against them, and decimate them. If the Ukrainian army tries to attack in open ground, they will take losses from anti-tank missiles, mines, artillery strikes, air strikes, and drone attacks.
    1
  38.  @normalusername5223  Wagner is going to be
    1
  39.  @rossmelnyk1900  The NATO countries that pledged F-16s, like Germany doesn't have any F-16s. The NATO countries that have F-16s never pledged any F-16s for the Ukraine. In other words, NATO countries didn't agree to send any F-16s to the Ukraine. They will not give Ukraine Euro Typhoons.
    1
  40.  @hammerfall6666  They don't want to give a $73 million aircraft for free. Combat aircraft are expensive. I am sure, the US and Nato wouldn't have any problems donating F-4 Phantoms, F-5 Freedom Fighters, and F-104 Starfighters to the Ukraine. Maybe, Zelensky should of asked for those older aircraft.
    1
  41. MSM is something I don't listen to anymore. It isn't worth 1 millisecond of my time.
    1
  42.  @Hereford1642  The previous administration already offered F-16s, and it didn't change anything.
    1
  43.  @Hereford1642  All Trump has to do is stop giving supplies and equipment to the Ukrainian Regime.
    1
  44.  @Hereford1642  All they have to do is stop the flow of supplies, and the outcome will be obvious.
    1
  45. Doesn't the US ever learn? Vietnam was a failure, Afghanistan was a failure, and Iraq was a failure. Now, they wan to start another war which will most likely turn into another insurgency war.
    1
  46.  @gilangputra7514  Exactly. Trying to launch an assault without adequate air cover is disastrous. We shall see what happens when the Ukrainians decide to start their offensive. I can imagine it would be like someone battering themselves against a concrete wall. LOL
    1
  47. Turtle tank, like the Korean Turtle ship. Looks like this Turtle tank is a great idea. LOL
    1
  48. US media is always saying the Ukrainians are winning, it doesn't matter if it is from CNN or FOX, they all say Ukraine is winning. The biased reporting from US mainstream media is getting ridiculous.
    1
  49. The mainstream media will say the Ukrainian army made a strategic withdraw, right? ROFL!!!!!
    1
  50. If the NATO and the USA is sending MBTs to the Ukraine then it is a clear indication the war in the Ukraine isn't going well from the Ukrainians.
    1