Comments by "Peter Ford" (@peterford9369) on "CNN"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jrlove1815 Come on. You people who compare Bannon, Hannitty, Ingram, etc, to CNN, ABC,etc, is ridiculous. Bannon, Ingram, and the rest of fox talking heads, aren't reporters, journalists. They're like analysts. They take what's reported, twist and turn it, and give their spin on it. Next time you get confused, go to any fact check site and look for the facts behind each supposed reporting. Then you'll see what I mean. Maybe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Count me out,, enough is enough,,,,,,,,, Oh please Donald,, forgive me,,,, you're me god. Please, please, I'll do anything,,, anything...
I wonder if John McCain were still around if Graham would keep his word more. I don't know, these people have no real decency it seems. All for none, every man for himself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dragonfly3816 I told you, I don't condone the destruction of personal property , city property, anything of the like. And those people should be dealt with accordingly ad well. Most people, even most protestors don't condone it. But that is up to the constituted legal system to deal with. Not vigilante law.
But coming from the BLM side of it. What the hell happens when there are non violent, totally peaceful protests? NOTHING. Look what happens when highschool kids protest peacefully about shooters coming in to schools with assault rifles, semi automatic pistols, smoke bombs etc, and kill, kids. Nothing. The gun companies and the NRA do nothing to curb the bubble gum Despenser gun toss to anyone with the cash. As much killer ammo as they can buy. Extended round magazines, sold at gun shows. As a mater of fact, didint Rittenhouse have to go to his friends house to even get the weapon? I don't think it's his. Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't matter. He took it instead of a camera, where he could have truly been a hero and taken pictures of the exact people actually commiting the damages. But no. He wanted to play storm trooper and threaten people into submission at the point of the AR-15. And 2 people were killed. Killed by an immature Rambo wannabe.
1
-
@dragonfly3816 If tuff guy Kyle, hadn't had the weapon. He wouldn't have had gun balls, and would have never confronted anyone. And these ridiculous names they gave these people, is disgusting. They're making a stupid game, out of killings. And you , graciously going along with it, by repeating them, show u have 0 compassion for someone getting killed. And not just shot. Shot with jacketed ammunition. Which doesn't stop when it hits something it goes bouncing around. Possibly hitting someone else. But I guess in your eyes, that's too cool. Wish you were there, yelling, Go Kyle go. You the man.
All he had to do was go there. Take a cell phone, call the cops to the area he saw bad stuff, and then he'd have been a good citizen. He instigated the situation, then when people responded to his actions, he shot them. And he felt like a big man. He's not, he's a punk wannabe
1
-
@dragonfly3816 Right, I don't remember my boy scout group leader promoting ,see a protest, grab your assault rifle and head on over.
And I watched some of the trial. And no matter the outcome, because of the way the judge was behaving and the points they used to make him seem like a regular public spirited boyscout,ur words,,,My point as well as millions of others was, why did he just have to bring a weapon,,,and not just a simple pistol,,,a rifle created for military use with,,,rounds meant for deadly force. He's a 17 year old kid, with no real safty weapon training, wanting to play man.
So, all the back and forth of the judge making light of the prosecution's points and not accepting some of the evidence because of technical reasons, the jury had to go by the legal aspects and not the common sense of his actions. You people and your constant craming the, your smothered by media influence,,,is getting old.
I based my judgement on the part's of the trial I did see,and the common question. Why did he take the weapon there, were all the attacks on him, because he had it and used it as a threatening shield?
Bottom line, if he hadn't had it, probably no one would have been killed and he wouldn't have been attacked at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@porscheman998 You're goofy! How are Dems being hypocritical? They're the ones who got shafted then and pretty much at risk of getting shafted again. The Senate has belonged to the Republicans since,,,,,,hell,, I'll have to look it up. But they were in power all thru obama's terms. And stood on his neck the whole time. Typical dictatorial behavior,,by the way.
Where you get off calling how the Dems are now hypocritical is ridiculous.
1
-
@porscheman998 Of course they are . Mcconnell and Graham and several other Republicans made a precedence in 2016 that the American people have the right to have a say in the sitting of a new justice. So they said Obama had no say who the new justice would be in 2016 because he only had 11 months left in his term. Suddenly Trump,with only 50 or so,,,Days,,,in office, he has the right? I don't think so jack.
Mcconnell wants it both ways. Obama,no pick,with 11 months to go,,, almost a year. But Trump with 45 days, has every right to pick? Yeah,,,real close comparison. NOT!
1
-
1
-
@porscheman998 It's not hypocrisy,,, it's tit for tat. You stood in our way and created a precedence. But now you want a switch back, cause it's in your favor. Most gov leader's pray on most Americans forgetting what they said years prior. Then when things suit them, they can do the opposite and say,,,you don't like it,,,prove it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@porscheman998 Supreme Court vacancy in 2016 and today
BY JUSTINE COLEMANTWEET SHARE EMAIL
Fox News's Chris Wallace pressed Sen. Tom Cotton on Sunday on whether there is "any hypocrisy" between the Arkansas Republican's 2016 comments to avoid a Supreme Court justice confirmation ahead of an election and his current call to "move forward without delay."
Cotton told "Fox News Sunday" that the GOP-led Senate has a "mandate to perform our constitutional duty" and fill the Supreme Court vacancy after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death on Friday.
Wallace then replayed Cotton's remarks on the Senate floor in 2016 in which the Arkansas senator asked, "Why would we squelch the voice of the people? Why would we deny the voters a chance to weigh in on the makeup of the Supreme Court?"
The senator made the comments after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016 and then-President Obama nominated Merrick Garland nine months before the presidential election.
"You don't see any hypocrisy between that position then and this position now?" Wallace asked.
"Chris, the Senate majority is performing our constitutional duty and fulfilling the mandate that the voters gave us in 2016 and especially in 2018," he said, referring to the midterm elections after Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings.
Wallace also asked Cotton if he would "still think it would be proper" for the Senate to confirm President Trump's nominee to the court if the 2020 election resulted in a new president and a Democratic majority in the upper chamber.
"Chris, as I said, we are going to move forward without delay, and there will be a vote on this nominee," the senator said.
"But, to the point, Donald Trump's gonna win reelection, and I believe the Senate Republicans will win our majority back because the American people know that Donald Trump is going to put nominees up for the federal courts who will apply the law, not make the law," he added.
Ginsburg's death has sparked an intense partisan debate on whether Trump should move forward with nominating her replacement with Election Day 44 days away.
The Supreme Court announced that Ginsburg died of complications from metastatic pancreatic cancer Friday night.
Trump has said he expects to nominate a woman to replace Ginsburg, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has vowed to give Trump's appointee a vote on the floor, despite blocking Garland's confirmation vote in 2016.
Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who spoke on "Fox News Sunday" after Cotton, argued that the election has already begun this year as many Americans participate in mail-in voting and early voting during the coronavirus pandemic.
TWEET SHARE
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In all fairness, the videos were taken by the supposed gang. So it was protestors that took the videos. Showing the lawyer with whatelse, his AR-15. A questionable weapon for the average homeowner. Looked to me like they had a short little cast iron fence maybe 4 ft high and the sidewalk boardered their yard.
I agree, if the protestors came up to his house or into his yard, he had the right to tell them to not do so, then, if they get confrontational show your weapon . But unless they came at him, he's not supposed to actually point his weapon at anyone. Noone knew his exact intentiions either. He could be hyper and shot someone just by mistake. Where was his footage? Why didn't wifey pull out her phone or a camera, instead of a pistol?
We hitched a ride one day, year's ago with a guy. He had a pistol within hands reach. We just wanted a ride ,no intention of anything I never would have. But we saw the gun. But who knows,, maybe he was a guy who would have kidnapped us by gunpoint? Guns work both ways. I don't always agree with Cuomo. I think he uses the shouting match, as a gimmick. But his points are valid for most part.
1
-
1
-
1