Comments by "GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies14" (@guywholikesthesnarkies1435) on "Geopolitical Economy Report"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What happened to China in the past few decades alone is very analogous to Stalin's rapid industrialization drive, if anybody ever thought about it. It's interesting to note that Soviet had previously implemented the NEP, which is what the socialist market economy is modelled after at its core, but expanded upon it.
But I'd like to note that even though Stalin's collectivism of the countryside and industrialization policy was formally a departure of the NEP i.e. state capitalism mechanism w. a dominant party-led Dirigisme, it was nonetheless developed upon the core strength of NEP that's the access and the capacity to absorb foreign capitals and recycle them in order to grow surplus in high added-value, as well as the necessary jump in material condition and growth.
Now looking back at the China's experience since Deng's Reform & Opening Up, I'm starting to look more and more at it as an analogous event of socialist construction albeit being dialed back to a much slower, gradualist pace because.. ahem* I think the Soviet was too accelerationist in that sense and that, they failed to recognize and properly anticipate the dialectical consequences of the Stalin's model following the end of the War i.e. the underestimation of the US/West's systematic, organized, and well-coordinated retaliation against the Soviet's political economic paradigm during the Cold War.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@aprescoup 1) Phony argument and once again, you're throwing another empty ad hominem to avoid from engaging with my argument point before. Did you not respect my position and listen to my request up there? "Don't pretend like you don't see my reply right before yours here.", I said. I'm gonna repeat my 1st point of my reply threads above, so you can't make any excuse to divert our arguments:
1) I was elaborating you facts about Chinese projects in my country in my earlier reply, and I was expecting your grounded refutation based on relevant data to those said projects as well. Trying to draw comparison of that with New Deal or European social democracy is bogus analogy, because obviously it bears little to no resemblance. Like tell me, what was your basis to draw such analogy and made you so self-righteous about it? I want to hear your display of your intellectual honesty and actually engage with your elaboration instead of stupid ad hominem, if you think you're always be correct.
So now, you read it clearly, what's your basis of comparing Chinese investment projects in my country Indonesia with the New Deal or the European social democracy? How come did you even found them to be similar, if not same? "It's more open to corporate capitalist exploitation of the working class.." Bold assertion right there, what's your data to back it up and your "New Deal" analogy buddy?
2) Coming from a so-called "libertarian socialist" student of Bakunin, Makhno, Michels, Mussolini, Petras, Pastreich, Vaush or whatever bs ideological convergence you could come up with, you're not even in position to speak about communism and be taken seriously. I don't have to start somewhere with that because you're such a joke yourself, you can't even bother yourself doing your homework and searching for the relevant and correct information out there to begin with
The fact is that you wholesale believe the widely propagated Western lies of poor Chinese, and you just proved yourself there. "Owning Nothing and Be happy" https://youtu.be/1hhSGfklMtw, I need your elaboration where did you get that quote and who said it? Also, can you see for yourself how Chinese people live in China☝️, do they look like they don't possess a livelihood necessary to sustain themselves a decent live, like your strawman Chinese that you just bloated about?
3)Oh, splendid👏 Who this is? An addition of seasoned racist orientalist "Asian" expert, who thought he could pass as legitimate one by having a Chinese name? He's no different than many other seasoned racist orientalist expert selling public face on twitter, I always dealt with people like him (while I was still there). I keep saying over and over, you're not in position to tell us Asian here because you're miserable White scum and it doesn't matter if you're actually White or not.
And I keep saying over and over as well, you're just doing this because you're desperate for strawman and you got nothing to argue. Why even citing an piece of interview completely irrelevant to our talking point? Do you even read that interview, what does he had to say specifically to the Chinese investment projects in our country here? If you think he could give us a lesson like a first-grader we are in your mind, then why are you only quoted an excerpt that has nothing to say about our arguments then??🤦
3.5) Last time you persuaded me to read that fascist theory from your much-admired fascist scum, I challenged that by mentioning the experience of my people under the 30+ years neo-fascist regime of the New Order, implying that our people were learning more or less the same kind of indoctrination people like Michels or Mussolini would teach and what's your response? You chickened out. Now, you're trying to convince me with yet another quotes of this racist White man? You really got no shame at all, did you?
2
-
2
-
2