Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
James Vesta ... @Lindy Peterson... Yes... while I was not always pro-life, I certainly never really considered what was the ACTUAL process of an abortion. The word itself, does not give hint to what is actually being performed. This notion of "it is just a clump of cells" or "not human until a heartbeat" is putting blinders on both sides and looking down this narrow tunnel of the only thing one wants to see... "not pregnant any more". The visceral image of actually HOW a baby is terminated is beyond brutal and why such discussions are NEVER had by anyone who is pro-choice. I would be wiling to bet, that if 100% of the populous that is currently pro-choice, would either change their opinion completely OR at least take no issue with aggressive restrictions (early in 1st trimester). I don't like it at all, but I do understand that we cannot possibly get 100% of the people on board with banning, so like ALL things that have been impossibly tied to the political, at least reach a compromise that ONLY the fetus can't live with!
.
Of course, that will not happen, because those who argue from a purely political perspective, are not willing to give ANYTHING, as it is considered a sign of weakness, so it is 8 months 31 days or bust! Something I had not thought directly about was a nervous system that must exist prior to "heartbeat", as this is the cut-off for the more rational of pro-choice people. Imagine how one would defend the literal ripping apart of a living creature (is human, but this reaches the defense we ALL have for living things) limb from limb and removed from inside the mother? I have to imagine that all but the most cold-blooded feminist ideologue, would have to "sense" the life from within screaming without voice!
.
Sorry to get so dark here, but as I got to writing it is just how it came pouring out :(
EDITED: 15 hours later to correct swapping pro-life with pro-choice where I misspoke.
5
-
4
-
4
-
@mazz4149 ... The Progressives (Marxist left of the Democratic party) or Regressives, as I prefer to call them, absolutely want a direct Democracy. Just as we did not need the Surgeon General to officially announce that cigarettes are bad for ones health, to know that they are! Actions speak WAY louder than words and need only look at the failure of the Biden "Build Back Better" bill that failed due to 1 single person... Joe Mansion, according to the Democratic party! No, they conveniently failed to recognize that there are approx 50 other senators who oppose that bill. A "true" Democracy is two wolves and 1 sheep arguing over what is for dinner! That is called TYRANNY and why we have the Electoral College and live under a Constitutional Republic. If not, politicians would ONLY pander to a handful of states and none of them would be in the middle of America.
.
I am not saying that all Democrats are Marxist, but the Regressives control their party and they ARE Marxists and absolutely want authoritarian rule. Just look at how ANY conservative values are treated and the MASSIVE censorship by big tech and that Biden admin directly reached out to FB, for example, to crack down on "misinformation". Exactly WHO is entitled to be the Tzar of information...? Fauci & the CDC, when it comes to Covid. This is called authoritarian, as only ONE source of information is acceptable and here we are nearly 2 years into a "10 days to 2 weeks" mask requirement.
.
I am not here to say that conservatives or republicans are all virtuous all the time, as that is ridiculous. What we have today is leftists SHOVING their "values" down everyone's throat and need only look at the ongoing attack of JK Rowling for the prime example of how they think. To them, you MUST adhere to the cult doctrine of Marxism or you are not even invited to the celebration event that SHE herself is 100% responsible for creating!
.
There are NO ultraconservatives who are influencing anything here. The problem is that the Democratic party has moves SO GD'd far left, that anyone who is to the right of Pelosi, is called alt-right! I could push back on this and give examples all day, but getting off topic here. If we lose the Electoral College America is DONE! We will have lost the greatest avenue for a peoples right to prosperity and happiness the world has ever known. There is a reason why so many people want to live in this country and it sure as hell isn't due to a systemically racist society, the Regressives ABSOLUTELY believe it to be.
4
-
4
-
@veganconservative1109 ... I agree. Of course, the berating you and I would get for saying this in open company, is that we want a return of slavery, but for the young as a whole. The problem is ALWAYS, that people think that legislation / laws can be written in such a way, as to eliminate one person taking advantage of another. As anyone with critical thinking skills will tell us, so long as humans exist, there will be a percentage that is malicious and will indeed screw over another... it is literally unavoidable.
.
If it ware abolished, there would be a certain degree of chaos, for some period of time, while the market worked it out, but it is best to recognize that it would land close, if not the same, as is currently mandated. It won't go up, because why would it...? It will not likely fall, as this would create a sheet-storm against whomever tried. In the end, not much would change at all, except the feds would have one more manner in which they seek to control private business.... removed from their grubby little laws.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@jgunther22 ... You are sooooo right, my friend :) There is a severe disconnect between the Democrat who votes to support the Gavin Grewsom's, Nancy Pelosi's, AOC's of this world and much of it is guided by the principle of Orange Man Bad. So long as trump was AGAINST something, they had better be for it. However, this is not about Trump, this is about the leftists who seek to LITERALLY destroy all that the Western World has built, in order to start a new from the ashes. Of course, their is no "plan" to create this utopia, except the idea that it will just magically pop up when all else is gone. They have no idea that once you take all of this away, we WILL have full anarchy and violence against each other this world has not seen in many thousands of years.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@theworld6710 ... Yes. As I have said above in multiple comments, Title IX was NEVER designed to punish men's sports, but due to the specifics of how it was written and the VERY bad actors who gamed the loopholes, there was some who said..."if women can't have a sport, men can't have one".
.
I get that it was striving for equal access and support of women's athletics (I am NOT a scholar on this legislation), but nowhere does it say..."if there are not enough women to create a league, facilities to support a women's division or maybe separate fields to enable such a division... we must ELIMINATE the men's division as punishment".
.
NO... that is not what it says and never what it was intended to do. Of course, those who are going after this law specifically now, having been in place for 50+ years, is NOTHING but a distraction from what we face today. The most important thing the legislation did, was create a SEPARATE division and private spaces intended to fill the specific needs of females in our society.
.
Yet here some of them are, talking about how the foundation of the house needs to be repaired, while the 2nd GD'd story of that house, is engulfed in flames! No doubt, that Title IX can use some tweaking to address those "loopholes", but since it is federal law that is being VIOLATED by multiple states, we certainly have MUCH higher priorities at the moment.
.
Even if it were tweaked again today, it would be FAR worse, because Democrats would allocate 90% of the funds go to gender studies in Poland and create an LGB museum in Venezuela!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@cainabel615 ... I hear you, but I told myself long ago, that I would do my best to not only understand, but be understood AND learn where / how I can do better myself. I am not perfect and I don't have all the answers and I absolutely have learned a TON of things, by speaking with those whom challenge my opinions.
.
Of course, since I pride myself on my ability to critically think, I have spent many, many years fine tuning my positions and, with the vast majority of them, reached a point where I have thought this stuff through extremely well.
.
It is clear that this person fails to understand why raising minimum wage, depending on how much, can be absolutely DEVASTATING to everyone in that society. There are many things not taught in our "education" system today and the one thing the Marxists NEVER want.... "critical thinkers". Critical thinking is the absolute enemy of socialism and I will continue to shed light on those who are trapped in Marxist bubble of evil.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@MosseChoker ... Since when was a minimum wage job designed to be enough money to pay for all you mentioned...? ummm...NEVER! They are designed for the first time work of a child (possibly supplemental income) for who has not yet left home and support most of the things they would want to do.
.
If one does not have enough skills to move beyond such employment, it is not societies responsibility (the taxpayer) to increase that minimum wage, so that you or anyone else can pay rent or mortgage, car payments, food and all the rest.
.
Now, we are unusually complicated by inflation, due to EXTREMELY poor fed govt. spending, but we cannot "spend" our way out of it, via taxpayer dollars. 100% of al of us has felt the burn of increased costs all over the place, so in such a case, a minimum wage job may be just the thing for that supplemental income mentioned already.
.
PS> As already mentioned in an earlier thread (may be on my own thread on this page), it is all but guaranteed, that minimum wage will not go down regardless. The outrage would be VERY high and the Joseph Goebbels Propaganda Media machine would be all over such employers like stink on sheet.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mazz4149 .. Maz... not quite understanding you here, can you clarify for me? :) What America was founded upon, is a democratic Republic, but the Regressives want a "true" Democracy. That is because they have a majority in all 3 branches, so they are perfectly fine shoving tyranny down the throats of the rest of us. However, they completely fail to recognize that one day, hopefully VERY soon, that balance is going to shift BACK to conservatives. If the conservatives acted as the Regressives are RIGHT NOW, they would be screaming from the top of their lungs about how "authoritarian" rule. Of course, this is EXACTLY what they have right now, but are too damned stupid to grasp how evil it is. They feel as though they occupy the "moral high ground and conservatives are quite literally evil to the core, so they have no guilt forcing their Marxist agenda on everyone else.
.
The tide is going to turn here and they are going to get louder and MUCH more aggressive then they are right now, so we need to be ready for it!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2