Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
@stevexracer ... BS. Simply because ther person is a "CEO", does not make them an instant ahole. If there is collusion between businesses, that is a crime and is punishable by law.
.
If we take your view to the obvious conclusion, than ALL companies would simply screw over everyone and guess what.. their products / service would SUCK, because the employees are not motivated to do a good job. If the guy next door, is paying lousy wages, than guess what... I am gonna pay HIGHER wages, to get skilled workers. When my business is selling more burgers and my place is always packed with customers, guess what... your company is going out of business, so you have 2 options.
.
a) Continue to be a damned fool and lose everything, or....
b) Raise your wages, so that good people WANT to work at your business.
.
I was part of a family business for 35 years. We did not last for the next 10 years, after I retired, to STILL in business today, by not being good to our employees. Just stop with the "corporate greed" BS, because "corporation" is simply a tax benefit for some, so it is not this trigger point of a good business turning evil. My workers knew DAMNED well, what other companies payed and If I wanted to keep them loyal, I had to pay them fairly often with increased benefits.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@snowcat9308 …. Yes, censorship is evil, but this is about age appropriate material, so it depends on the age of those whom have access to it. Best example, of late, is the gender queer books that were rightfully removed from grade school libraries. They were not and are not “banned books”. These are very graphic descriptions, with suggestive images, that are written in a way that is easilly understood / digested by sub 5 yo children (like cartoons).
.
I have no issue with books, movies that depict or describe same-sex images or scenes, but these are adult activities, so 18 yo is apprpriate. This is the age of concent, (some states are 16) because society has come to a determination, over thousands of years, that the cognitive development level increases over time. The process of complete development, has been determined to be approx. 25 yo.
.
There is a reason we do not let 5 yo’s drive a car, smoke cigarrettes or drink alcohol. They are simply not equipped with the cognitive understanding or discipline to make a healthy judgement call. There is a reason that “kids do dumb things” far more regularly than adults and is for the above reason.
.
Protecting the developing mind is not censorship…. it is called being responsible.
2
-
2
-
To take what @Peter Holubz has already said, but with some modification. No, I was once very proud to be an American, but am certainly not proud of what this country has become. I realize that what we see today, had its seeds sewn back in the late 50's, but this 3rd generation of socialists finally has enough infiltration to make its stand. I am indeed grateful to be an American, but I have grave concerns for where we end up when all this madness comes to an end. It most certainly will, but in the wise words of Neil Peart (RIP) of the band Rush , "We will pay the price, but we will not count the cost". There are far too many who will not stand for a socialist nation, and that includes myself, so I fear that civil war or at the very least a physical assault on our political capitol to overthrow the evil that wields this insane power is a very real possibility.
.
What I cannot imagine is how those that are the TRUE leftist ideologues will integrate into the society that is left after the above. Fortunately, the overwhelming VAST MAJORITY of these leftists are merely sheep. Oh sure, they think capitalism is evil and we should all have free healthcare and a place to live, but they are just regurgitating the party line to pander for social currency. Those TRUE zealots are just not going to make the transition and they will continue to be incapable of living amongst the rest of us. One thing is for sure... it is gonna be ugly!
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jesusfuentes9347 ... WOW, you just had to go there, huh?.. lol No, not a laughing matter, but we can see how contentious simple cell harvesting from an abortion can be, but imagine the image of an incubator with a legally dead newborn kept alive by machines, in order to harvest for others born with physical deformities and such... EEEK! Does anyone remember when this issue got VERY much into the public sphere when Ronald Reagan was president? The concern and in some cases it would absolutely be valid, that an aborted fetus could be "harvested" (drawing a blank at the moment for what this is called... someone help me) for such cells in the name of treating Parkinson's, cancer and such. Of course, we all know what would happen if we just opened up such cell harvesting from abortions, pretty much 98% of all abortions would be claimed as performed would be "not only for health of mother, but to help those in need".
.
It is really amazing the can of worms opened by issues surrounding abortion, isn't it?
EDIT: Just did a quick bit of research and there indeed have been / are cases of the incubator babies being used for organ "donations". Talk about an ugly image of factory harvesting of infants.... quadruple x10 thousand EEEK!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@new_t9478 ... Exactly. The problem, as I see it, is with the trans "activist".
.
I am 57 and live 30 miles from San Francisco. I say this, because I saw first hand and up close the long struggle for things like gay marriage. What I saw was a rightfully protesting group of people, wanting the SAME rights as everyone else. Now, to be fair, I think the BIGGEST issue that most have with gay marriage, is with the term " marriage". This is considered a religious term, as it is found in the bible. This is neither here nor there, but I do think it helps some to understand what much of the resistance was.
.
What we are seeing today, is not the "LGBTQ community" (hate that term, BTW), looking for equal rights, it is the trans "activist" (Twitter outrage mob) DEMANDING that we unlearn everything the Western World has ever come to know about male / female and toss it all out the window! They have made this NOT about adults who have gender dysphoria, but about erasing the entire idea of male / female completely.
.
Beyond that... they are telling us that children, as young as well below 5 yo should be consulted about or allowed to "decide" if they are a boy or a girl. This is ABSOLUTELY ABJECT INSANITY on every possible level. The trans "activist" is standing on the shoulders of what the G&L fought for back in the 90's, but without the reasoned approach they used to sway opinion.
.
They are using language, cancel culture (another way to say "destroy ones life") and CEO's who have infiltrated companies to SHOVE trans down our throats. This is all going to backfire in the HUGEST way and is all because the ACTUAL trans community is not pushing back against this utter madness.
.
I would be willing to bet, that 95% of all of this is coming from activists looking to virtue signal for social currency and POWER!
1
-
@new_t9478 ... OK... now you are losing me!
.
There is a VERY fundamental reason why those who oppose LGBT for youth, as this is a NON-adult (pre 18 yo). The human mind is not even fully developed until about 23 yo and people aren't even done with puberty, until a year or two prior to legally being an adult.
.
Going through puberty is difficult enough, but compounding that issue many times over, via hormone therapy or other medical intervention for those who have NOT completed puberty will can cause catastrophic damage to everything from reproduction to losing the ability to reach orgasm.
.
The OVERWHELMING number of people have no issue with trans, so long as it is ... A: done via consenting legal adult and B: NOT imposed upon those who are NOT adults... That's it! Now, there are most certainly other issues, like public bathrooms and ESPECIALLY women's spaces, but those could be worked out, but the trans activist has ZERO patience to even discuss these issues. Their "tolerance" is trans go into any / all women's spaces and everyone can just STFU about it!
.
There is ZERO light needed to shed upon the trans community, there is only the realization that tolerance is a TWO-WAY street! There WILL always be some that are simply not going to accept trans people... period! That is a very small number... but it ain't gonna happen, so that is just going to have to be accepted.
.
The HUGE issue, is the pushing of gender and sexuality upon young children. This is inappropriate, as we need to let kids be kids. There is no place in pubic education for non-binary or ANY genders beyond male / female as these are the ONLY genders that exist. Even intersex, who comprise under 1% of humans born, are not a "third" gender, as they are a form of birth defect. That does not mean ANYONE should be treated with less than 100% human rights, but that we don't take many thousands of years of human existence and tell lies to children.
.
Once these kids reach the level of legal adult... have at it. Take all the hormones, therapy and medical intervention you want... just stop asking for special privileges and live your best life :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, they do! Parents have been failing their children for a full 3 generations now, but Millennials failed in the most catastrophic of ways. They were too busy "having it all" and allowed their children to be raised by nannies, baby sitters, public "education", TV and the worst of the worst EVER to be fall human civilization.... social media! The mass of Gen Z stand for nothing except self-gratification and destruction of ALL that afforded them the opportunity / ability / right to do so. The problem with indoctrination, which is beyond question what has happened here... is that those who have been, have NOTHING to fall back upon, but the complete ruination of all they had come to understand.
.
Were society to "flip a switch" to instantly replace all of the HORRENDOUS ideas, understanding of history and reality of how the world actually works, their brains would be the robot in 1950's outer space "B" movies. Smoke will come out of the ears, arms flailing and "what are you doing, Dave" is all that will be heard. When their world collapses, and it most certainly will, we are going to see an absolutely MASSIVE surge in psyche patients and self-delete the West has ever known. It is going to take 3 generations to turn this around, only AFTER, society fully accepts that we need to do so!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hobbit Homes ... I am not altogether sure it can be saved any longer 😿The question is not that the cult will lose this fight, because they most certainly will, but how much damage can they inflict before doing so. Beyond this, how is it we can live amongst those whom have decreed you and I as evil? This is why the "Peaceful Divorce" idea will never work. Even if it were possible to divide up resources, in order to split the country, which cannot be done, BTW.... is it reasonable to consider that not only will the leftist cult leave us alone, once done, but will even abide by an agreement they make with the devil (their view of conservatives)? No, they will not negotiate in good faith, nor feel obligated to abide by any deal that was made. The cult is self-righteous and feels no obligation to treat those outside the cult with any level of decency.
.
Short of a 911 type of tragedy, don't even think that would do it today... unless the West has a catastrophic issue that forces unification, the cult will continue to divide us until there is but a single option that remains.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@simonstonesifer4951 ... Yes. The analogy of "two wolves and a sheep discussing what is for lunch" is about as good a descriptor as it gets! The leftist thinks ONLY with emotion of the moment and ads NO other considerations to the equation. They seem to think that since the state is completely controlled by the Marxist cult of ideology today .... it will remain so for the rest of time. Since the education system has catastrophically failed them, they are under the impression that the existing power will remain that way for the remainder of all time. They cannot comprehend that one day, the tables WILL turn and the new powers will have a VERY different idea and turn what is of HUGE benefit to them today, will destroy their entire world in the coming years. By destroy, I mean undo all of the damage the Regressives have succeeded in reeking in the last 5 years.
.
Now, society will take a HELL OF A LOT LONGER to fix than overturning CRT and trans in women's sports, but it WILL eventually happen, if not in our lifetimes. Leftists seem to think that the, what... 10,000+ years of human history?, those people just got it all wrong. They just flailed around and never got society right in all that time, and ONLY in the last 5 years have we figured out that none of what we had learned in that time was worth a sheet! It's funny, yesterday I was replying to a comment on another video. The guy called me a "narcissist" for praising the conversation as an amazing one (literally 2 years ago!), between Zuby and a man that has now been accused of killing multiple people in just the last couple days. He called me out by saying ..."the guy you called amazing, just murdered 5 people", and in a follow up comment, he said I should learn to spot ... "narcissistic behavior" better... lol.
.
Since the video comments were removed shortly after his post (my notifications still display his response), I was unable to not only praise him for being able to see the future 2 years off, but chastise him for not warning police of Mark David Chapman PRIOR to his murdering John Lennon. Or his hold grand father accountable, assuming his incredible talent of foresight is hereditary, for NOT killing Hitler when he was a small child, only to later begin WWII.
.
To think... he called ME a narcissist! :)
1
-
@monsterhunter445 ... Yes. she is far left. Although not nearly as far as AOC or some others, but her lack of back bone to stand up for what she has proclaimed in the past, is one of my biggest issues with her. Back when Clinton was under fire for his lies about what happened in the Oval with an intern, she said that we should not proceed with impeachment as there was not enough bi-partisan support and would divide the country... to this I agreed.
.
Fast forward to Trump... she said she would NOT vote to impeach, but then gave in to Regressives pressure and voted for it 4 separate times!
.
There was not even CLOSE to bi-partisan support, but she has TDS, so there it was. Now take a look at Jan 6th and how it was a "threat to our Democracy" crap. No.. it was a riot, not unlike the BLM & Antifa riots she supported for over 9 months!
.
EDIT: My last line was incorrect, as Jan. 6th was NOTHING like the "mostly peaceful protests" of those 9+ months! BLM, Antifa and their followers were responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in damage, destroying countless businesses and lively hoods of hundreds, if not thousands of people. There was rampant destruction of LITERALLY anything or anyone who befell their eyesight and some 34 or so people were MURDERED, while many were beaten close to it. We witnessed a federal building barricaded with many people inside and the attempt to throw Molotov Cocktails through the window and BURN THEM ALIVE!
.
Where the hell was Pelosi and these PoS Democrats about that! This was a federal building, while not as politically significant as those involved on Jan. 6th, there was an ABSOLUTE AND INTENTIONAL desire to burn those people, mostly officers I understand, to death while they would have cheered like it was V-day, 1945! Pelosi is a PoS and she is leading the charge on Jan. 6th "insurrection" in order to froth up hatred of conservatives and most particularly.... Trump!
.
Hard to imagine how terrified the Democratic party fears this man, yet Pelosi and her party are still fixated upon him, as if he were still writing "mean Tweets". I am getting waaaaayyyy of track here, but suffice to say, you can call Pelosi anything you want, but regardless of the words decide to use, those I use will be far, far less kind :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@youngthinker1 ... Again... that was not the spirit of the legislation. However, you and I should spend our energy arguing over this and ignore the object evil of beta-males taking rightful place in female sport, invading their shower, changing and dressing rooms, while the females are demanded to take "re-education" classes to be more accepting of their safety and privacy being devastated.
.
The original intent of Title IX was a good one, but like ALL legislation, bad actors got involved and added a bunch of pork that screwed that caused harm to male sport, when that was NOT the initial intent. It was bad actors and largely feminists who set out to "get even" and harm men... just as they do today.
.
Stop arguing over how it could have been written / implemented better and start focusing on the girls, ladies and women losing scholarships, having their dreams CRUSHED by weak ass beta-males and having to deal with same leering at them in their PRIVATE spaces and sororities.
.
Go ahead, bitch and complain about Title IX and ignore the EVIL that is happening right under your nose. Title IX is 50 years old, how about focusing on the present, eh?
1
-
@blackjay5338 ... Yes. Feminist ideology has long sought the attacking of men, in the hopes that it will somehow "lift" women. Well, if something hurts men, it hurts women and if something hurts women, it hurts men.
.
Feminists won the the battles that gave them equality of access, but that is not enough for the modern one... they must have "equity". This desire for equity is absolute evil, but they cannot see it or why it is so. Men are forever attempting to please women, so far, far, far too many have become beta-males in that attempt and look where it has gotten us.
.
Weak as beta-males invading women's sports and getting off on being in their private spaces. This is light-years from what masculinity wants to be, but since it is openly demonized, men are "trying" to appease what the feminist wants.
.
Society is dying due to failure of masculinity.
1
-
1
-
@HCP121 ... As I said, breaking treaties was obviously a breach of morality, though I don't know any details about those that were broken. Exactly nobody is denying ANY of the "uncomfortable truths" about America. Nobody denies slavery or refuses to teach it in schools, but we MUST account for the society of the time, for the context in which these things were done. None of which is an excuse to deem it as "acceptable", as slavery, like breaking a treaty is a moral sin. However, we must ALSO recognize, that those native tribes did 100% of those SAME THINGS to those whom occupied the lands before we conquered and took them for us.
.
In the end, we absolutely must recognize the wrongs, and for the most part, we do. However, there are those who would rather just see us beat ourselves up until the end of time, so that THEY get the virtue signalling points it seems you are attempting to gain right now.
1