Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
@manaloola2018 ... Hello, Ms. She who has a really cool view from her window 😸I hear you, but that is a double-edged sword. The bigger issue, is not that the guests name is controversial, but that ANY name associated with anything OTHER than the prescribed doctrine of the leftists... is, as you are saying... dismissed out of hand. So long as this is the case, a person may click the video, but he moment he / she sees it is such a person as described, they will leave the video, having made for themselves the conclusion of its content. This is a failure of society and a name change is just not going to do that.
.
I recognize your point, but you and I are not dictated by that doctrine, so even if a video had an interesting or intellectually enticing title, but was someone with whom we may not agree or even like, you or I might still be intrigued enough to follow through watching, due solely because of that "intellectually stimulating" title. In the end, due to the doctrine that prescribes PragerU as right-wing extremists who are anti-black, "transphobic" and push white supremacy, such a person does not even have to read the title, in order to instantly dismiss as "right-wing MAGA propaganda".
.
A couple years ago, Amala was on a college campus and going to do a talk with Q&A afterword. Well, she went outside to talk to the hundred or so protesters (let's not even talk about the INSANE fragility of college students who are literally incapable of listening to an opinion they have decided well in advance is absolutely racist, but told by a black woman!)... anyway, she went out to talk with them to see what it was they took issue. Invariably over the course of say 6 or 7 minutes, Amala spoke or tried to speak with 20+ protesters. She was calm, polite, respectful and simply asked, why do you protest? She offered to hear them out and allow them to speak their mind and express the issue. Well, those who would even respond, just make blanket statements of "PragerU is racist, sexist, ablist... " the list goes on. She was saying ..."look, I am a black woman. Why would I work for a company that is overtly racist?". Well, as you and I are both VERY well aware.... logic, facts and reason have no bearing whatever to the indoctrinated. They have decided that PragerU is all of those "ists" and, due 100% because of someone who TOLD them this was the case and that person was told by someone else who ALSO had no good faith experience with PragerU.
.
In the end, the overwhelming vast majority of the indoctrinated cannot be helped. This is because they were not "brainwashed", as we would call it... they NEVER had proper understanding of nearly everything they were taught, because the absolute PURE EVIL of the "educational system" they were exposed all their life, did not seek to educate them. They simply wanted soldiers for the cause. To expect those college students to listen to Amala, as to see machines in the old science fiction movies, where the robot has a melt down, because it could not process the information it was provided. Smoke comes out of its ears and it mutters .."what are you doing, Dave?" over and over until it dies. These college students have no "brainwashing" that can be undone, because their ENTIRE world view is built upon a lie. To undo that lie is simply not possible, lest we see that robot melt down. The moment one of them starts to see THAT melt down approaching... they shut off communication, say something vile to Amala... or just walk away.
1
-
1
-
... Sadly, I have found that the vast majority of those who would also detest this WOKE as much as you and I, are just not paying attention. They have fallen for the word-game that the progressives use to disguise what is really happening to our society. I have got to say, that the leftist plan to destroy not only this nation, but the entire western world could not POSSIBLY have been orchestrated better! Now, it will one day collapse, for about 25 reasons I can come up with off the top of my head, but ultimately because its idiotology is riddled with contractions.
.
My own mother insists that she is of a conservative nature, if not politically, but has 100% fallen for the leftist narrative and will literally get up and pace around the room shaking saying... "I don't like that man" (when I say "literally" I mean exactly that!). We are talking like the mother of a 3 yo child in the emergency room being operated on for 12 hours with the chances of survival @ 3% shaking! Weird as this may sound, it is my hope that she does not live long enough to see this Progressive house of cards come tumbling down. The shock of learning she was 100% blindsided by what had happened to our culture to bring about this administration, would make her see Trump in a whole new light and I honestly think it would give her a stroke!
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rosenthaldiscount ... Do you remember how INSANELY opposed the Regressives were about a vaccine during Trump's admin in early months of 2020? I remember vividly how every one of them was saying how they could NEVER possibly trust anything that Trump would authorize, as if he was planning to sneak into the lab and injecting Clorox into the finished samples set for human testing. They spoke, quite literally, as if Trump was not only just fine with people dying of a poisonous vaccine, but that he actually WANTED people to die, because he was a Nazi, white supremacist, homophobic, transphobic, racist, authoritarian tyrant hell bent on wiping out the human race!
.
Zeducation did a video a while back with excerpts of video of everyone from Pelosi, to Gov. Cuomo, AOC to Shumer and the whole lot of them saying they would NEVER take a vaccine created under the Trump admin. Of course, it is that EXACT SAME VACCINE that has 100% of the Regressives doing everything in their power to convince the world that death is a 100% certainty if the are not jabbed with that very vaccine.
.
As for your words on mandates... I am 100,000,000,000,000% with you and Biden will trample all over The Constitution, Bill of Rights and States rights in order to shove the leftist agenda down our throats. The GOP has NO ballz and have failed to give a collective FU to his authoritarian mandates, so "We The People" are going to have to push back ourselves. Sooner or later, the leftists will go on micro-aggression too far and the sheet is going to hit the fan and HARD!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@snowcat9308 ... You are just itching for some sort of confrontation here, aren't you? The book "Gender Queer" (think that is the full title, but do not even want to search to confirm), discusses VERY graphic details on sexual interactions, between characters in the book that are minors. If you think it is necessary or even OK, to have books that must be censored when read on national TV or school board members telling parents that reading from such books is unacceptable in their meetings, than you have VERY different ideas about what should be in taxpayer funded schools with children of the age that book was meant as reading level. So, as per your inference, it is OK for 5 yo's to be exposed to the very graphic details of sexual interactions between children of around this age, because what.. "they won't get it?". Well, kids being kids, will go out and experiment with putting a boys p** in another boys mouth to see what the fuss is all about.
.
Children of the age that book was meant to academically reach, are FAR below the age of understanding the dynamics of such interactions and the risk of a very wide range of social, health and stigma related societal issues. They have ZERO business being exposed to this part of the human condition, as children lack the cognitive ability to discern, as well as the inhibition to restrain from adult activities. See, you ARE taking the least faith interpretation, as I don't distinguish "gay" relationships from "straight" ones, when it comes to the age of those we are talking about. You are trying VERY hard for a gotcha, by your use of language here and I find it very curious indeed.
.
This has NOTHING to do with being gay or straight. My concerns here are with the appropriateness, or lack there of, for the age of the students with access. You are the one who has and continues to make this a "gay" issue, so you are seeking to paint me as anti-gay or homophobic in line with the "modus operendi of the right". I don't take my cues of morality from Daily Wire, PragerU or anyone on the internet. You are the one whom is conflating issues of my concerns of exposure of sexual material to young children, is somehow anti-gay motivated.
.
Your last line sums up your agenda perfectly. I am talking about a book with very graphic detailed descriptions of human sexuality in a grade school library and you think this is me trying to hide or conceal children from knowing gay people exist (your words). Kids will naturally begin to "experiment" with such things described in this book, rightly or wrongly, in due time and is in overwhelming amount of cases, during puberty.
.
Let me ask you this... is Gender Queer SIMPLY about gay people and their "interactions" with each other? Do we allow Penthouse magazine in the schools? Do we allow unfettered access to the internet to children of this age? If not, why not? Serious question. Can we just allow kids to be kids and figure out all this stuff, as they have for the last, oh.... I don't know 100K years? Do we need to have graphic descriptions of sexual acts being performed by children and with reading level comprehension that reaches young children? Do we REALLY need that, in order to tell these kids... that "gay people exist?". Is this the academic path in which you feel is best for a child to first learn of gay peoples existence, by describing how to perform a b*** **b on another student?
.
Society can do better to show how various people show physical affection, but how about we wait until they are a LOT better emotionally, physically and cognitively able to incorporate it into their lives? The overwhelming vast majority of full grown adults will STILL say it is too young to grasp the gravity of such interactions (pregnancy, emotional attachment or the removal of its importance and even disease). This is not and should not be about "sex" alone. It is about a bonding that will happen when shared with a person of whom, I would hope that care deeply for one another. If not, than sex becomes a simple act of pleasure and we can see OF an the VERY high number of young people whom have access to pr0n and often times before they have even had it. This cheapens the experience and lessens that "bond" one should feel, when with a very close partnership. This strengthens not just a marriage, but long-term relationships, so that these two people, irrespective of their gender, share something special that ONLY they do. This creates an intimacy and a "value" that we are losing, when it comes to sexual interaction.
.
I could go on and on, but I would like this to be a conversation, so.... please let me know your thoughts :)
1
-
1
-
@snowcat9308 ...OMG, my last comment ACTUALLY remains, so is the first one in the last ten. I understand, you do not want conversations that belong in THIS threat, on your channel, a that is a perfectly reasonable stance and feel exactly the same way myself. However, had you ACTUALLY read those comments, you would understand why I put them there, as well as my apologies for doing so. Instead, you simply delete them and then block me from posting normal positive comments about your cute cat videos. I kept the political comments OFF of your videos, because the "Community" tab is off the beaten path and you had no user comments there, prior to my using that page.
.
I check today and... BOOM, my last comment actually still exists. However if YouTube decides to delete this one, I again will have no way to reach you. On to the topic at hand....
Bad faith: YES, you are arguing in bad faith, because I already told you about 1 book "Gender Queer" and is 100% sexually explicit material. It is written for lower-grade school reading levels (circa) 1st and 2nd grade and has ZERO place in public school library where that age child has access. Your gaslighing and denial that this book is sexually explicit and presented in the reading / comprehension level of the ages of children I just mentioned, shows how you are arguing in bad faith.
.
There are other books, but that one is by light-years the most well known, as MFL (organization of female parents against such material ) have been wrecking the likes of Joy Reid and Bill Maher, to name a couple, by simply reading that book aloud to them. Joy Reid is the worst of the worst, when it comes to HORRENDOUSLY bad faith arguments, yet those two Moms read from that book and Joy still tried to defend how it was "banning books". This is an outright lie, because keeping such material away from those age children is not censorship nor banning... it is the right thing to do. As I said, in the comments you conveniently failed to read or at least fail to acknowledge you read.... another example of bad faith. Whether wont acknowledge having read them or to NOT have read them and repeating the same question as above, is concrete evidence of your bad faith position.
.
That same book has been read aloud in many [board meetings of "educators"] and those who run the meetings, shut down the microphone, for the reading of explicit pr0n, within the meeting. That [board] calls that book for what it is during the public meeting forum, yet is directly responsible for that book being made available to children 12+ years younger than the 18 year old minimum America has said (via laws) across the country. The banning of books and keeping them from such age children are not the same thing and you know this to be true. Avoiding this SPECIFIC issue repeatedly and asking me again to tell you which books.... is yet another example of bad faith.
.
Furthermore, it is 100% irrelevant that this book happens to be about gay interactions, as it would be precisely as explicit were it identical, but was male / female CHILDREN depicted within it. You have proven to me, in just the same way as probably 50 others whom I have tried to hold this conversation, that you will duck, evade, obfuscate, straw-man and gaslight me, in order to avoid answering the following question...
.
Why is it that you refuse to recognize that book for being [s** e****] and specifically presented for children of the age mentioned above? You have conflated the ACTUAL Issues of such material and told me that I and others whom feel the same way, are seeking to "hide or deny the existence" of gay people. The answer has been made abundantly clear, multiple times within this thread (and the comments you fail to acknowledge on your "Community" tab), by me and by every person who has publicly called for its removal from elementary school libraries. Yet... here you are speaking as though this has NEVER been said and earlier claimed it as an excuse to avoid teaching children about gay people. I have proven multiple times this is a lie, so more proof of your bad faith position.
.
We do not allow unrestricted access to internet, via the schools these children attend, nor do we allow [Top Floor of hotel magazine] or [adult activities] visual recorded media to exist there, so tell me... what is the difference between the book we are discussing and these particular items, listed immediately above...? Hint: NOTHING!
.
PS> If this comment remains for you to see, I will be absolutely shocked, because replies that expose the agenda are not welcome here.
PPS> I still have that comment that was posted on your "Community" tab. As a conservative who knows what it is like to be censored, I back up those comments that come within 500 miles of "wrong-think"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@snowcat9308 .. OMG.. Yes. Educators who want to children to be exposed to material that is SPECIFICALLY meant for adults. You, know, literary depictions of acts! Those depicted are of years under the lowest legal age in US. So, as per YOUR definition, if it is a "personal experience" of someones "gender identity", than the idea of adult behavior is mute?
.
Children do NOT need a deeper understanding of activities that are ONLY legal ones between adults. A book, that discusses activities that are ONLY legal between adults has no place in a public school library, where not only accessible by minors, but written SPECIFICALLY for them to understand.
.
As for "politely", what you are telling me, is that I am ONLY spouting that which has been told to me and because I disagree with you, that I have obviously not done any thinking for myself. What if I was to say..."I would like you to politely ef off"? Using "politely does not make it less insulting, but actually more so. Your telling me to seek other sources of information, is you not just being condescending, but narcissistic, arrogant and self-righteous, because YOU think you know better than I.
.
That book is written for children, yet with very adult themes, so has no place within publicly funded libraries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timothycai6534 ... While I agree with you in principle... I will shift topics a bit to say there are things one can do to forfeit that life, in my opinion. Many who are pro-choice will take issue with those who are pro-life over capital punishment and seek to cry hypocrisy. There are certainly many who are pro-life, as well as against capital punishment, however... I am not one of them. I believe in due process and, in the cases of death penalty, guilt be proven well beyond a shadow of a doubt. Prison sentences create problems of their own as they should absolutely be about punishment. But, f we just put someone in there and "poke them with a stick" for years /decades, how are they likely to be released one day and fit into a "normal" society? This will ALWAYS be a problem, so long as we have the current system in play, but I will NOT pretend to have an answer for all those that would challenge me on rehabilitation. Of course, I would absolutely agree that without rehabilitation and just using that stick for years is always going to leave a large percentage of parolees VERY bitter, so much more likely to commit crimes again once released.
.
Wish I had a great answer for the issue of federal / state prisoners being released as worse than they went in, but the only way to reduce that number is spend a HELL of a lot more money and resources into rehabilitation. We all though abortion can be a divisive issue, capital punishment can be equally contentious :(
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cheezedoodlenygguh6229 ... It is funny to have this conversation with a "whamen that don't need no man". If women literally vanished from earth over night, society last less than 100 years (ignoring any and all other factors that WOULD have an impact). However, theoretically, if MEN were to vanish, society could probably last for many thousands. There would be "harvesting" of sperm and freeze them, so women could STILL populate for a long, long time. Of course, when the toilet stops working, the car stops running or the roof needs to be replaced.... there is NO WAY in hell society would continue that long. There ARE female roofers, plumber and such, but not NEARLY enough and there are just not enough women to fill all of those rolls.
1
-
1
-
1