Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "The Officer Tatum"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@themadrapper101 ... The very first time I heard the term "wh-ite pr-ivile-ge", was on Gre-y's An-ato-my . I was watching on a certain service that when mentioned HAS gotten this comment deleted 4x's already, and was late 2015, I think. That episode was several years old, but even though I had ZERO idea about WOKE at that time, I was really ticked off by hearing it. It was not until another year or so later, I'd heard it again and been probably 1K times since! What amazes me is the self-delusion that treating an entire race of people as a pariah will lead to ANYTHING but resentment, anger and, if goes on for much longer... ext-re-me c-iv-il un-happ-ine-ss. I would argue that the worst part of s-lav-er-y, is the d-ehu-man-iza-tio-n of those who are e-ns-lave-d.
.
While nobody is ens--la-vi-ng people in America any longer, white people are indeed being deh-um-ani-zed openly on social media, commercials, TV and MarxistWood, to name but a few places. In the end, there can be no question that the Western World WILL have additional people who will describe themselves as wh-it-e s-upr-ema-ci-sts, because they will have been raised in a culture which rewards people for openly expressing racism toward them. I get that the Regressive wants to tear down the "evils" of ca-pit-alis-m for so-cia-li-sm, as if that is not catastrophic enough, but what we are heading towards is a reversion to the most base of all human responses to a complete co-lla-ps-e of a so-cie-ty.
.
I don't know what is going to happen here, but there is no way America can withstand another 6 years, if that red wave does not come, of Regressive rule without a huge number of people snapping. I am still trying to hold out hope, but it is getting darker every single day :(
.
EDIT: Took me about 10 tries to get this past the minions of anti-1a
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jimmie Jay Bohorn ... Um, what is not accurate? I copy / pasted YOUR EXACT quotes directly from your comments above. Are you denying you said them? Cannot say out of context, because the context is exactly as much as you gave. ANYONE who votes yes as Ketanji for SCOTUS does so 100% on ideological grounds and that is an absolutely OBJECTIVE FACT! I am opposed to her, because she cannot even answer the most basic of ALL questions posed to her. I may not know the law as well as she does, but how in the hell is she to apply it, when the case before her is the following:
.
She has two defendants before her in a courtroom. The defendant has a lawsuit because she feels wrongly overlooked for promotion because she is a woman. By Ketanji's OWN admission, she is unqualified to rule in that case. She cannot define a woman, so how can she rule on the merits of the case? SHE..... CAN.... NOT!
.
This is pure insanity at the highest of levels, yet you defend her as a qualified for the highest court in our land. Now, Jimmie... if you have the balls to come back her and ACTUALLY address my questions right here, I will be thoroughly impressed. However, I will be fascinated to see what kind of argument you make and if you actually stay on topic.
2
-
Jimmie Jay Bohorn ... Classic :) Jimmie pulls the "R" card as that is the ONLY card you can play. You cannot defend your backing of this SCOTUS nominee NOR answer the issue I gave you, so what is the next best thing to the cult...? "RACIST!"
.
My God, the lack of intellectual honesty from you is exactly what I expect from a leftist ideologue. You have NOTHING but talking points and as soon as you are asked an honest question that ANY honest person would be able to address, you come back with a change of topic, exactly as predicted, and claim I am racist because reasons. Even if you failed to give a good answer, I would offer you respect for trying. As it stands, you have nothing to offer that is worthy of my respect in backing this SCOTUS nominee.
.
What a truly pathetic attempt to shift your inability to defend your position, into a personal attack on me, which cannot be substantiated, but that does not matter to the ideologue... only the accusation. How sad this all is.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2