Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "The Rubin Report"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@oerjanlothe2369 The entire GQ interview. Were there any Peterson wins? Here are a couple of Helen wins, starting at like 41:00.
1. Helen: It works in two different ways, it makes lobsters more aggressive and it makes humans less aggressive.'
Peterson interrupting: No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive...It makes a lobster more likely to fight again.'
[uh Whoops Jordan. She agreed with you that serotonin makes humans less aggressive, and she is wrong... for agreeing with you? Lobsters that want to fight are not displaying aggression? Fighting isn't aggression? The relevant paper is called Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans, concluding that serotonin makes lobsters adopt aggressive postures...SCORE: Helen 1, Jordan 0]
2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.'
Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...'
Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?'
[Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0
3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.'
JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientist identify as Marxist.
[Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. 3% of a skewed sample group does not equal 'widely held view'. I guess you can teach psychology even at Harvard without having a basic grasp on scientific and mathematical analysis. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', i.e. Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0]
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.'
[The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2