Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. Let's see what Rubin has today: 1. There is a movement by the Left to 'Burn It All Down.' Rubin's evidence of this movement is Pete Butigiege asking Bernie if he wants to Burn It All Down. CONCLUSION: That has to be one of the wimpiest pieces of evidence to support a point I have ever seen in media. Burn it down would be burn the Constitution and fire all politicians to start over. Who is pushing for that Dave? Strawman. Rubin probably thinks his conservative audience is not sophisticated enough to see through his flimsy trick, and unfortunately he is probably right. Dave digs himself in deeper, knowing that his gullible conservative fan base will swallow the whole pill. 'The leftists the post modernists the socialists marxists are pushing throughout society...' Using the same unspecified fictitious bogey men Jordan Peterson uses. Dave if all this group is continually pushing this throughout society, you can identify even one right? So why didn't you? STRAWMAN. 2. Rubin steers clear of the complete and irrefutable hypocrisy by Lindsey Graham and other leading Republicans by calling hypocrisy by leading politicians merely irrelevant. Irrelevant? Really Dave. Well I guess Dave considers hypocrisy in politics irrelevant. Let's see...then he says that AOC is hypocritical beyond belief. Uh whoops Dave. Anyone see the irony? Dave is a hypocrite while discussing hypocrisy. Out of one side of his mouth, it is irrelevant if Republicans do it, but a really big deal if Democrats do it. 3. According to Dave 'Trump has to choose a justice now' because we could have a tie and the election will be disputed and then the country will be chaos. Sure Dave, Trump has to do it...Not. The country will have a tie and a disputed election that throughs the country into turmoil...Not happening. Pretty wimpy and agenda driven spin Dave. Don't you argue against agenda driven partisanship. Do this Dave. Interview me. I have far better ideas on every issue than either of the two dorks we have to choose from at jgreeen4prez2020 on FB.
    1
  2.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Vote by mail is awesome.
    1
  3.  @TheRagingPlatypus  I correct... An awesome idea. You get your ballot in the mail. You take your time filling it out, then put a stamp on it. Awesome.
    1
  4.  @TheRagingPlatypus  2000 mules is a hoax. Somehow fraudulent voters got millions of unfilled in ballots? Sure and monkeys fly out my butt.
    1
  5.  @23wtb  This one time at band camp Trump won the 2020 election.
    1
  6.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Tell me how you would aquire even 100 ballots and then how you could make Biden win by 4 million votes with those.
    1
  7.  @TheRagingPlatypus  They didn't show the same person at multiple boxes. Biden won get over it. Next film by Dinesh... How many abodiginals do you see modeling?
    1
  8.  @questioneverything9535  They picked up bunches of ballots that were filled in by registered voters? So?
    1
  9.  @TheRagingPlatypus  So they had great evidence they didn't put in the movie? Smells like a hoax.
    1
  10.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Again, you want your candidate to win in a vote by mail state. Describe how you do that? BTW one of the only documented cases of absentee/mail fraud was by a Republican Harris in NC.
    1
  11. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  12.  @bry8120  If you right down Peterson's ideas you realize it is all nonsense.
    1
  13.  @bry8120  Ok neither of us can find something intelligent by JP. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  14.  @bry8120  Peterson is apparently effective as a self help guru for lost souls. I am glad for them. His ventures into science, politics, and philosophy are comically deluded. He never has a solution to anything and his ideas, rather than derived from an observation of reality, are derived from his other ideas.
    1
  15. Did JP have a coherent insightful idea in this video?
    1
  16.  @franskat213  I have never heard JP offer a solution to anything. Most of this interview is incoherent rambling.
    1
  17. Improved title of this video: Dave Rubin Click Bait of Something that Didn't Happen.
    1
  18. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  19. One of them said something intelligent? Where?
    1
  20.  @deathgrinderb3284  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  21.  @davidlang4739  I proved that Rubin playbook only convinces gullible conservatives, do you have proof of something?
    1
  22.  @TubTechGuru  The Afghanistan war was a spinoff of the Iraq war, a republican idea. Both Trump and Biden wanted us out of Afghanistan; we don't know how things would have gone different by Trump. True the border crisis is largely Biden fault. But even Trump doesn't have as good of an idea as I do. My main point however, is only gullible conservatives fall for Rubin videos.
    1
  23.  @TubTechGuru  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer.
    1
  24.  @absolutium  I don't understand your point. My point is Rubin presents arguments with nothing but made up claims such as 'look at her face', only the super gullible ideologues fall for it.
    1
  25.  @laurelh1799  No one can find an intellectual idea by Rubin.
    1
  26.  @TubTechGuru  We don't know what would happen if Trump started the withdrawal. Both Trump and Biden wanted out of Afghanistan.
    1
  27.  @laurelh1799  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  28. We are searching for an intellectual useful idea by Peterson. No one can find one.
    1
  29.  @piolin23iq  Did you find an intellectual useful idea by Peterson?
    1
  30.  @wannabecar8733  Jordan Peterson is the second coming.
    1
  31. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  32.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  We are searching for a profound intellectual useful coherent idea by Peterson or Thomas Sowell on any subject anywhere. No one has found one.
    1
  33.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson or Thomas Sowell.
    1
  34.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  So these guys have wisdom, rationality, and reason, but not intellect? I am confused. Anyway provide a profound and useful idea by JP or Sowell, I will check it out. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    1
  35.  @MarMaxGaming  It's important for parents to use judgement and encouragement? Wow, if I had a PhD and taught at Harvard I might know that also, except I learned it from watching Mr Rodgers neighborhood. Clinical evidence shows that if you confront your challenges you can conquer them... Jordan Peterson. You needed clinical evidence to figure that out Jordan? I learned it from watching Dora the Explorer. Highly trained affective neuroscientists recognize that there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals. Uh sure Jordan, but third graders know that also.
    1
  36.  @MarMaxGaming  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  37.  @MarMaxGaming  Peterson shared the fantastic advice that parents should use judgement and encouragement? Pretty low bar for fantastic, pretty sure I saw that concept discussed in a sesame Street episode.
    1
  38. Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  39. 'Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks about “The View’s” Whoopi Goldberg freaking out about the European heat wave, while Joy Behar suggests that the Eiffel Tower could melt.' Dave, I think you need a lesson in nuance. Was Joy Behar literally commenting that the Eiffel Tower might melt? No. Maybe a middle schooler can explain this to you?
    1
  40. ​ @mark_downunder Did Peterson say something intelligent that your average middle schoolers couldn't figure out on their own.?
    1
  41.  @mark_downunder  Pride comes before a fall? Already covered in Disney movies and on sesame Street. We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  42.  @l000tube  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  43. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  44. At 55:00 JP has stated that athletes can break their own records or play a really great game. Ok duh. Let's check Rubin's response: 'Do you think it is weird that it is a fleeting moment? I did good for a month, but then I can have a bad month, you can't hold on to a great month forever.' [Let me see if I got this right Dave. You can have a good day, or a good month, or an athlete can have a great jump or scoring game...but then something happens and the next day or month or game might not be as good as the last? I think I actually agree with you on that, although I wouldn't call it weird. Weird would be if all days were good or the same.] JP: 'Minutes lasted hours and I mean that literally.' [Let me give you a heads up JP. The only way that could happen literally is if you were in some kind of time distortion device or a black hole.] 'The weight of time and mortality and self consciousness and you escape that immersed properly.' [Immersed properly? In what? You can escape mortality and time? Not on this planet dude.]
    1
  45. Easily the MOST nonsensical speech JP has ever done, and that is a pretty tough bar to clear.
    1
  46. At 29:00 JP: 'It is proving very difficult for defenders of enlightenment values to put up an effective fight against this assault on the idea of ompotence. There is nothing solid enough there for some reason'. [I bet even Rubin doesn't know what Peterson is talking about here. Dave? Is ompotence even a word?]
    1
  47.  @BodyLanguageBoss  So what is Peterson's point?
    1
  48.  @BodyLanguageBoss  At 43:00 Peterson astonishes us that truth and family are important. Man I wish I had a PhD so I could know this stuff.
    1
  49.  @BodyLanguageBoss  At 44:00 Rubin astonishes us that the internet increases the speed of communication. It is so great to watch two super geniuses addressing modern issues.
    1
  50. Peterson said something intelligent? What was it?
    1