Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  2.  @slagebobs4109  You found a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP? Where? Dozens? Can I see one from this or any other video?
    1
  3.  @slagebobs4109  I understand, you are pretty sure JP has said some useful intellectual stuff in this or another video, but you aren't sure what it was. If you find it LMK.
    1
  4.  @slagebobs4109  Peterson said x at timestamp y and it is intellectual because z. Try that. Any useful profound idea that your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own.
    1
  5.  @slagebobs4109  True it is important to be personally responsible for your success and failures. I learned that from my parents and teachers in third grade. Vast swath believe in guaranteed income? Percent and source? Quote JP saying something insightful in this video. I promise to check it out, mixed with massive amounts of fake intellectual nonsense: Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  6. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  7. No one can find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  8.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  I agree, you can't find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  9.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  This will be tough for you since it requires competence in the use of facts, facts in this case would be quoting what JP said and presenting an analysis that it was something more than the most basic and obvious concepts wrapped in fake intellectual jargon. Try that.
    1
  10.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  Again we agree, JP is the leading fake intellectual of this century!
    1
  11. Dave, I know triggering your gullible conservative fan base is kind of low hanging fruit, and of course being a sycophant for ideologues is a good money making gig, e.g. you and Shapiro, but wearing a tax the rich dress doesn't make AOC a hypocrite. She is pro tax the rich. I hope that helps. But lets try this, here is my solution to regulating greed, tell me you get the benefits. You might also review the Scientific American paper Income Inequity its worse than you think...the income inequity gap grew to 350x from 20x in the last 50 years. Here is my plan: List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation from my idea on income inequity and regulating greed: INCOME EQUITY: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  12. ​ @bryanbenaway5411 no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  13.  @michaelleahey7250  Our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson continues.
    1
  14.  @sulista-consulting  Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...'
    1
  15.  @chrishansen7104  No one can find an intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  16.  @tnerb830  No one can find an intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  17.  @sulista-consulting  We are searching for a useful idea by JP. No one has found one.
    1
  18.  @MrGheller  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  19.  @davidmcgowan6119  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  20.  @AlbertQian  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  21.  @Domcel  No one can find a coherent useful idea by JP in this speech.
    1
  22.  @deonscott91  No one can find a useful coherent idea by JP.
    1
  23.  @CapoVito100  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP, who feels he is the second coming and self appointed explainer of the world.
    1
  24.  @martin_swellfitness  Our quest for an intellectual idea by JP continues. An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _______________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  25.  @eugeniorey4565  No one can find a profound intellectual coherent idea by Peterson.
    1
  26.  @Terri19karen  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  27.  @leopoldbourne8444  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  28.  @foulplay99  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  29.  @Super_Nova1234  No one can find a coherent intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  30.  @daouddenali8450  Be a monster... Sniffle... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  31.  @markbrown8937  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  32.  @markbrown8937  JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  33.  @petercullen1624  Mostly he spews ridiculous over simplifications and makes nuanced issues black and white; coupled with a monster but fragile ego spewing rambling nonsense with no coherent point. Why anyone considers him an intellectual or role model is a giant mystery.
    1
  34. Dave, you should interview me. I have better ideas than any of the democratic candidates at jgreene4prez2020 on FB. Here is one: As an improvement over the standard 'increase the minimum wage plan, Federal guaranteed home ownership program for anyone with a three year work history at any job who can keep up with an affordable mortgage, funded by a 70% tax bracket above $500,000 per year including capital gains, to get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy landlords, stabilize their housing costs thus increasing their spending power and mental health. Find the flaw if you can.
    1
  35. ​ @bobs8942 Peterson has figured out how to use a fork and a plate to organize the cosmos and climb Jacobs ladder. Tell me you are not impressed.
    1
  36.  @bobs8942  That is Peterson from this video.
    1
  37.  @bobs8942  Listen to like the last 5 minutes and have a good laugh.
    1
  38.  @bobs8942  Just remember next time you are setting the dinner table you are actually organizing the cosmos, and preparing to climb Jacobs ladder to the shining city on the hill. Not sure how Peterson being very careful to use precise words escapes you.
    1
  39. But conservatives think Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson are smart.
    1
  40.  @bills5009  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  41.  @Labadamier  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  42.  @silverhammer7779  Prove that Rubin click bait is supported by the content. Watch Rubin Peterson greatest speech, and comment back after you stop laughing.
    1
  43.  @silverhammer7779  Thank you for your feelings. Try using facts. You look smarter that way. But if you think Rubin and Peterson are smart...
    1
  44.  @silverhammer7779  What I proved is you can't find a non Strawman by Rubin. You proved nothing.
    1
  45.  @silverhammer7779  ok we agree, Rubin isn't smart. That wasn't so hard was it? BTW, I vote by mail. You only get one ballot.
    1
  46.  @silverhammer7779  I correctly defined Rubin playbook. You can't prove me wrong. I win, you lose.
    1
  47.  @silverhammer7779  See the irony here? You claimed that it is easy to make liberals look dumb, but I as a liberal made you look dumb.!
    1
  48.  @bills5009  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer.
    1
  49.  @bills5009  Rubin and his fans aren't fans of facts: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  50.  @bills5009  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1