Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
One problem with Mark Levin is that he, like most conservatives, think Jordan Peterson is smart. Let's check out Sowell as another pretend intellectual: 'Social justice fallacies, is it stuff, these ambiguities...yes it did, I observed things and facts, it sounds good but it is horrible... what does social justice mean, if you agree with the leftists and the marxists, but if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice... they assume that if everything isn't the same for everyone that someone has done something wrong...these radical autocrates do they mean centralized government, redistribution of wealth, a permanent government that undermines representative government ... it is... these intellectuals have a high opinion of themselves..
[Why are two guys who have no idea what social justice means pretending to have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals, while bemoaning people who have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals like Sowell and Jordan Peterson?]
Let me help you two arrainge your toys. Social justice is at its core a movement to regulate greed, to limit the power of the wealthy to profit off the work of others. It has nothing to do with 'a permanent government that undermines representative government', it has nothing to do with 'if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice.' You are welcome for a lecture in logic and facts from a liberal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@susandanner496 Here is a lesson on using facts: The news is always wrong in the first draft? Always? They are lying on purpose. So how do we know when Tucker is lying on purpose? Is he always wrong in the first draft? We don't know who launched the bombs Tucker, and Zelinski didn't say the us should start a world war. Are you lying on purpose right now? He said he believed it was a Russian missile Tucker, that isn't a lie. The security guy said the evidence suggests. Not a lie either. Also Tucker it's not the Biden administration, it is bipartisan votes by Congress to send defense supplies to Ukraine. I agree sometimes the news is inaccurate, but you complaining about that?
Tucker at 7:45 'Why as long as it takes, Ukraine is not a democracy, what is our security interest, could it be that this entire effort is a choreographed scam to enrich the democratic party and it's allies, to achieve Left wing ideology and BLM goals, it is possible, because that is how DC works.....'
[Wait didn't Tucker start this by lamenting the dangers of dishonesty by the media? And now he is trying to link Putin attacking Ukraine with some left-wing ideology to enrich the democratic party? No wonder some of his colleagues quit because of Tucker's indifference to the truth in favor of inciting angst among gullible conservatives?]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rfbedell347 1:30 'SBF Anything I make I am going to give away, money from FTX backdoored to another company, it disappeared, he donated $38 million to democrat elections, a denial is not proof, American government donated to Ukraine with crypto FTX, how much of that went backdoor to SBF and then to democrats, was money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war....'
[Sorry Will, SBF donated about 1% of his networth to election campaigns, not 'anything I make'. A denial is not proof? True, your allegation is not proof either as much as Fox viewers will probably believe it is. The US government donated to Ukraine with FTX crypto? Any proof of that? What the US is doing is supplying security infrastructure for Ukraine defense not 'here is a stake in our crypto account' pal. 'how much money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war.' The US isn't funding a war, it is trying to stop a war invasion by psycho Putin, that Trump and Fox like to excuse. To establish your wild allegations we need to know: A. The US government was giving Ukraine money. B. This was in the form of FTX crypto currency. C. Instead of using this alleged crypto money to fight the Russia invasion, someone in Ukraine simply decided to give it back someone in the US. Here is my suggestion Will and Fox. For your next post, how about addressing those issues with some form of evidence rather than wild inflammatory theories. This would require Fox to be an actual news channel however.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@susandanner496 The news is always wrong in the first draft? Always? They are lying on purpose. So how do we know when Tucker is lying on purpose? Is he always wrong in the first draft? We don't know who launched the bombs Tucker, and Zelinski didn't say the us should start a world war. Are you lying on purpose right now? He said he believed it was a Russian missile Tucker, that isn't a lie. The security guy said the evidence suggests. Not a lie either. Also Tucker it's not the Biden administration, it is bipartisan votes by Congress to send defense supplies to Ukraine. I agree sometimes the news is inaccurate, but you complaining about that?
Tucker at 7:45 'Why as long as it takes, Ukraine is not a democracy, what is our security interest, could it be that this entire effort is a choreographed scam to enrich the democratic party and it's allies, to achieve Left wing ideology and BLM goals, it is possible, because that is how DC works.....'
[Wait didn't Tucker start this by lamenting the dangers of dishonesty by the media? And now he is trying to link Putin attacking Ukraine with some left-wing ideology to enrich the democratic party? No wonder some of his colleagues quit because of Tucker's indifference to the truth in favor of inciting angst among gullible conservatives?]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1