Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "The Rational National"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mikoserbousek4987 sometimes you have to try and reach them, they remind me of Nazzis back in Germany in the 1930's screeching about Jews hiding everywhere threatening the German state and how they were evil. today the rhetoric hasnt changed, except for who is targeted now, which is the republicans. my family lived through that time, my farm right on the German border still had bullet holes on the outside walls, my grandfather told me about them. and as much as it pained him to talk about those times, he talked about them to us as much as he could, as a warning to always watch out for it. us Polish never trust Germans, and he feared that the Germans would rise up again, so he taught us. but i moved to the states, and now i see the same rhetoric that the Germans used against the Jews coming from the democrats. sometimes you have to work to show people, because the alternative is horrifying, i know, we had a concentration camp 15km from our farm.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@blascantu7221 i agree, George Floyd was the victim of an injustice, and his murderers were arrested and will stand trial. that doesnt give anyone the right to riot. i could see protests happening IF no one was brought to justice. now for the majority of people marching being peaceful, the overwhelming majority of conservatives were peaceful too.
now here is a double standard for you. the capitol riot occurred because no one is listening to the complaints that the right is bringing forth. in 2016, when Trump won, democrats accused him of collusion with Russia, without evidence. Schiff claim to have had a mountain of evidence, to which we are all still waiting to see, the only thing democrats had were accusations, to which there was the Mueller investigation that found no collusion. during this election, conservatives have brought forth actual evidence of voter impropriety, video evidence of ballot boxes being pulled out from hidden locations while the vote count watchers were dismissed or blocked. there is actual evidence of impropriety and affidavids of impropriety and all of it dismissed by democrats as simply "you lost now shut up". i would call it an injustice that people have valid complaints backed by evidence and it is being dismissed without even an investigation being done.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@nrf91 valid point, and i tend to agree, Rittenhouse should not have been there. but given that Rittenhouse worked there, and had friends there, and there are some reports claiming he had family there, that creates a connection to the community in the same way that Trevon had a connection to the community he was walking through. in either case, it is wrong simply to attack someone for believing that person does not belong there, and it is disgustingly wrong to actually stalk someone because that shows intent to attack. what did Rittenhouse do to deserve being attacked? its all in the eye of the beholder, people say he was a threat because he had a gun, even though he never used his gun or even pointed it at anyone that was not directly attacking him. same question about Trevon, what did he do to deserve being stalked and attacked? he simply walked through a neighborhood where someone else perceived him as a threat.
as for you trying to say that "If anything, Zimmerman, another cop wannabe with a gun who used it to kill innocent people, is the better analogy." shows that you think Rosenbaun was innocent, even though you admit in your first sentence that Rosenbaum was acting as the agressor.
you cant have it both ways, either Rosenbaum was the aggressor or he was innocent, and if you think he was innocent then him stalking and attacking what he perceived as a threat was justified. and if stalking and attacking someone you perceive as a threat is justified then please go tell Trevons parents that Zimmerman was justified in stalking and attacking Trevon.
the whole event boils down to this. Rosenbaum had several interactions with Rittenhouse that night before being shot, and at no point during those interactions did Rosenbaum try to attack Rittenhouse because he perceived him as a threat since Rittenhouse was open carrying the whole entire time. you cant argue that that someone who sees a man with a gun doesnt think of him as a threat and doesnt disarm him but then later decides that he is a threat when that "threat" has done nothing threatening the whole time. its like me sitting in a park and you walk by with a gun and i dont try to disarm you but later i try to disarm you even though you have done nothing to become a threat, i didnt perceive you as a threat the first or the second time i saw you with a gun, and you didnt use the gun in a threatening manner, so how can i argue that i seen you as a threat the 3rd time around?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@nedzed3663 no no no, you are supposed to get the murderous urge after inspecting their toenails.
personally, i have multiple guns, i never got any urge, in fact, ever since i started carrying, i have been more aware to try and avoid any confrontations. just a simple "you are right, my fault, sorry." and walk away.
but if i see toenails, OOOOOOOOOOHHHH, then its on like Donkey Kong.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4