Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "The Rational National"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
close to what Loki originally was? what was Loki originally? please enlighten us, because i see Loki as a deity capabale of using magic to change one appearance, but still originally born as a SON of Fárbauti, a jötunn and Laufei, a goddess.
in all the written fables of Norse mythology, Loki and Thor have always been referred to as brothers, never as brother and sister, or brother and creature, or brother and magical beast, but always as brothers.
so as far as mythology goes, Loki originally was a MAN, no matter what he shape-changed into for a time, that was his original form.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@f3tsch906 ok, so lets see, all the points made at 2:25
1. refused to punish Kyle for violating terms of his bail - judges perrogative, plenty of judges do that plenty of times.
2. excluded evidence of rittenhouses behaviour before and after the shooting, same way the judge excluded evidence of Rosenbaums behaviour before and skateboard mans behaviour before, which would have characterized them both as having a pattern of abusive and violent behaviour spanning years. you should be happy the judge did not allow the defense to characterize the 2 people shot as violend wife beaters and PEDOPHILES, because that would make the jury hate them and clear Rittenhouse on day 1.
3. allowed the defense to charecterize the people Rittenhouse killed as rioters - BECAUSE THEY WERE, even the prosecution in its closing argument characterized them as rioters by listing all the things they did, such as tip over portapotties and set things on fire and flip over trucks and such.
4. yelled at prosecutors in front of the jury - judges tend to do that, especially when prosecutors break the rules set by the judge, or even worse, when prosecutors VIOLATE a defendants constitutional rights, or even more worse, when prosecutors TAMPER with evidence. he is lucky that all he got was yelled at, if i was the judge i would immediately slam the gavel down and declare a mistrial with prejudice, no matter who the defendant was, because you can not have a fair trial if the state violates your rights and then makes up evidence.
5. dismissed a gun charge - plenty of times judges dismiss charges in a case, sometimes judges even dismiss entire cases. if there is doubt to the intent of a law, then perhaps the law is flawed and the charges should be dismissed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3