Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @Boucky-n1y  He also waited until Trump was out to invade Ukraine. You are perfectly irrational.
    2
  2. +小小白 The word for this is "crybully".
    2
  3. "Kissinger himself?" Do you think that there is a sane westerner who thinks Kissinger was EVER on our side?
    2
  4. The majority of Illinois does not vote in Chicago mayoral elections.
    2
  5. Nero without musical talent.
    2
  6.  @shirmeymckamey9386  " you're welcome to your 'Clown World' " He is so long as we don't have to live in it.
    2
  7. All this caveat really means in this context is that the people who throw away valid ballots are breaking the law. We already knew that.
    2
  8. This is what Nixon was booted for - using government operatives to spy on his political enemies, then trying to cover it up.
    1
  9. Is that supposed to mean something?
    1
  10.  @joserobles2683  Until you translate that to sense, if you can, you haven't said anything. Your call.
    1
  11.  @AeroMetalRush  He knows his options better than you do. Totalitarian states do not allow their citizens to leave. Overseas Chinese students know that their families are hostages for their return, and their behavior while abroad.
    1
  12. You are claiming that there is a comparable pattern of Republican celebrities criticizing Democrats on the basis of morally neutral personal lifestyle choices or immutable characteristics. In other words, you are lying.
    1
  13.  @gone547  "You with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome': but you neither can nor need argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome, this '. I feel also that this surrender of the claim to truth has all the air of an expedient adopted at the last moment." - C. S. Lewis
    1
  14. That's not the net direction of migration. People are leaving to live.
    1
  15. That's why what? What does revealing the oppression in NK have to do with western corporations getting NK minerals? Tell me. O mighty censor, what is the criterion of the truth I am allowed to tell and the truth I am not?
    1
  16. " Destroying his bill before they even saw it." After it's passed it would be too late to stop it (except by a court challenge, which should strike it down). It has federal mandates against state measures necessary to secure the vote, that's all a reasonable person needs to know. The US Constitution puts regulation of the elections in the hands of the state governments. The only reason why a person would support this bill is if they thought their own party was better poised and more disposed to cheat, and were down with that.
    1
  17.  @fabianurweider805  "why is it always at midnight on a Saturday" So the corrupt won't be on site to disrupt the process. This is not covert. This is fully transparent.
    1
  18. That makes the joke hit harder. He's claiming to have saved them up so he can give the homeless something worthless.
    1
  19. Are you going to play semantic games while young black men are denied an opportunity to enter the workforce and build a resume? Not exclusively black men, of course, but ESPECIALLY black men. That is a generally destructive policy, but also racist.
    1
  20. It's not the lies that bother them. They let the liars spout.
    1
  21. The have, they will. That's how we got this great statesman. Thank you, Texas. Cancun is nice. That's where a senator belongs when there's a hurricane in Texas. What idiot thinks that more talking heads are necessary in an emergency? The governor can act in an official capacity in an emergency. A senator can't. This is a perfectly idiotic criticism.
    1
  22. 6:30 "back in the day, before the Internet" Fewer people had cameras on their person, it would likely not have been a story at all If network cameras had been there they would have controlled the edit and concealed the context and the only defense the Covington students would have had is their word, assuming they could get anyone to listen to their side. From all indicators, the media have ALWAYS been doing this sort of thing, NOW folks occasionally have the means to catch them at it.
    1
  23. We are not attacking, in general, those who have to leave blue states because of bad blue policies. We are attacking the policies. We are criticizing an actual anthropogenic disaster and the anthropoi (people) generating it. They are attacking the refugees, we are attacking the hurricane.
    1
  24. Thanks for reminding us that the "victory" that started all this "blue wave" talk was a result of more personal slander (dropped now that it has served its purpose). You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't keep fooling all the people all the time the same way.
    1
  25. Yes, his appointments are excellent.
    1
  26.  @marcoscunha511  Ice cream is untraceable.
    1
  27.  @nijbala5364  "So they have done something wrong that they need protecting from?" This does not follow.
    1
  28.  @MekonenMeteor123  It's "you're"
    1
  29.  @dennislawrence8501  "Fox has Cancelled." "Cancellation" is an act of POWER. Fox does not have the power to cancel anybody.
    1
  30.  @reliablereindeer The GOP members have made the aid contingent on Biden enforcing the border laws. All he has to do is reverse back the executive orders he reversed in the first place and enforce the immigration laws. The border crisis is more important, and more our responsibility, than Ukraine. Biden want's to replace the electorate more than he wants to aid Ukraine, or even win this election. If YOU are concerned about Ukraine, urge Biden and the Dems to take the GOP deal. If you won't do that, you are not concerned about Ukraine.
    1
  31. We should have a vaccine in about a year, that's the estimate I read.
    1
  32.  HuckFinn  source?
    1
  33.  @Jake-wi6cn  Fox is editing out the laughs so he can fire him. Or to scare him straight.
    1
  34. Yeah, acting conciliatory gives the impression that the obstructors have some sort of moral authority. There is not and never has been a moral case for tolerating illegal immigration. It's all just illegal political calculation and greed.
    1
  35.  @matt7iron  "he will get his money back." Only if he performs. Think of it as an executive performance bonus.
    1
  36.  @tobybigham4196  Well, I suppose genocidal monsters are a group, of sorts. But calling for genocide is not protected speech, since calling for criminal violence is not, and genocide is a subset.
    1
  37. And it ate up a lot of airtime.
    1
  38.  @jackherbert6450  "state tv comments section" Boy, are YOU lost. PBS is thattaway.
    1
  39. Are you saying that the Coronavirus is a technological artifact? I thought that nobody was supposed to say that!
    1
  40.  @WaldemarPerezJr  There is not a viable alternative to money in some form.
    1
  41.  @canadamonroe6229  No part of history was excluded by the old curriculum. What's new is political indoctrination in race hate for partizan political gain.
    1
  42. He's gonna need a new trophy case.
    1
  43. "Jews are playing both sides" Oh, so we can just ignore them, fine!
    1
  44. Cultural reference, google goodnight john boy. I'm not in control of your time. If they're smarter than me, they know better than to listen to you.
    1
  45.  @harrylee7148  There is nothing remotely racist about anything TC has ever said. You know this. Everybody knows this. It is a feeble attempt at Bulverism and it's beginning to lose its force as any fallacy does with overuse. You are unable to oppose your opponents with rational arguments so you attribute to your opponents irrational or ignoble motives for their views to try to excuse yourself and your readers from engaging his arguments, for dismissing them a priori . And you have the audacity to invoke the name of God in your slander. Quote from Bulverism by C. S. Lewis: You must show that a man is wrong before you start explaining why he is wrong. The modern method is to assume without discussion that he is wrong and then distract his attention from this (the only real issue) by busily explaining how he became so silly. In the course of the last fifteen years I have found this vice so common that I have had to invent a name for it. I call it "Bulverism". Some day I am going to write the biography of its imaginary inventor, Ezekiel Bulver, whose destiny was determined at the age of five when he heard his mother say to his father — who had been maintaining that two sides of a triangle were together greater than a third — "Oh you say that because you are a man." "At that moment", E. Bulver assures us, "there flashed across my opening mind the great truth that refutation is no necessary part of argument. Assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error, and the world will be at your feet. Attempt to prove that he is wrong or (worse still) try to find out whether he is wrong or right, and the natural dynamism of our age will thrust you to the wall." That is how Bulver became one of the makers of the Twentieth Century. Suppose I think, after doing my accounts, that I have a large balance at the bank. And suppose you want to find out whether this belief of mine is "wishful thinking." You can never come to any conclusion by examining my psychological condition. Your only chance of finding out is to sit down and work through the sum yourself. When you have checked my figures, then, and then only, will you know whether I have that balance or not. If you find my arithmetic correct, then no amount of vapouring about my psychological condition can be anything but a waste of time. If you find my arithmetic wrong, then it may be relevant to explain psychologically how I came to be so bad at my arithmetic, and the doctrine of the concealed wish will become relevant — but only after you have yourself done the sum and discovered me to be wrong on purely arithmetical grounds. It is the same with all thinking and all systems of thought. If you try to find out which are tainted by speculating about the wishes of the thinkers, you are merely making a fool of yourself. You must first find out on purely logical grounds which of them do, in fact, break down as arguments. Afterwards, if you like, go on and discover the psychological causes of the error.
    1
  46.  @BigKandRtv  "@harimakenji7608 Uh, are you serious? Trump is all the time telling people how he is NOT racist." That's not what he asked. Woke is not anti-racist.
    1
  47. So, Mexicans WOULD pay for the wall.
    1
  48.  @JF-qw4bd  "when it's combined with government authority"? You're talking about information FROM A GOVERNMENT DATABASE!! It was already combined with government authority, it was just formerly less honest government authority.
    1
  49.  @REVERSESARCASM  Speak for yourself. Nobody can fix the problems if the establishment successfully suppresses the existence of the problem. The world needs to know these things.
    1
  50.  @tracieroberts6323  What about Trump's taxes? If he were doing anything illegal he would be in jail after all these lengthy, redundant, over-hyped and super-expensive "investigations". All of these discredited "scandals" and "investigations" are eagerly remembered by conservatives, as blatant and numerous examples of Democrat slander and abuses of power. It is you who should wish to forget them, not us.
    1