Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @atomf9143 , I’m certain that Putin is well aware that NATO is nothing more than an obstacle. However, he also knows that NATO is an insurmountable obstacle. They Russia has no chance against NATO, so NATO expansion means and end to his aspirations of rebuilding the Russian empire.
    4
  2.  @johnm7267 , Seems like you should move to Russia. You would probably love it there. When are you going?
    4
  3.  @meso8848 , Russia is trying to expand west, but Russia is failing because its incompetent military isn’t able to defeat a country with less than 1/5 its population despite having a 10x artillery advantage.
    4
  4.  @NewOrleansSeptember , This video is an accurate description of the situation in Ukraine right now. If you don’t like it, too bad. What you like or don’t like has no impact on the truth.
    4
  5.  @attilamarics4808 , You’re confused.
    3
  6. “If they’re not able to show results with all the equipment they’ve received…” You mean, “If they’re not able to show results with all the equipment they haven’t received…” The fact that the west didn’t start training a few thousand F16 pilots and aircraft mechanics over a year ago has left Ukraine handicapped, and we all know this. The results of this summer counter offensive while Ukraine is handicapped is irrelevant. They will receive more and more aid until they defeat the Russian Nazis who have invaded their country.
    3
  7. But Russia can’t manufacture ball bearings, microchips, and many other components. Russia will never be able to replace that AWACS that Ukraine shot down.
    3
  8.  @nian60 , Do you know the population of Belarus? Do you know the population of Poland? Do you know the size of their respective militaries? Poland obviously doesn’t need any help. All they have to do is focus only on military targets. The locals will likely help them eliminate and resistance. Then the rightful elected Belarusian government can take over.
    3
  9.  @foxquetzal420 , I totally agree. They should have taken out that bridge, and all the bridges to the north of Crimea. And also the locks in the dam for the reservoir that supplies Crimea with water. Immediately after, they need to take out all of Russia’s black sea naval presence The west needs to supply Ukraine with all the tools required to accomplish this.
    3
  10.  @ETBrooD , They’re only delaying the inevitable.
    3
  11. If the negotiations will last years, Ukraine will win this war before they’re finished.
    3
  12. Why did Ukraine allow the Russians to escape Kherson? There’s no way they withdrew in one day. That’s impossible. Russians usually have 3 defense lines. Everyone except the forward most line snuck across the river in civilian clothes for over 3 weeks while Russia claimed that they were evacuating civilians. Ukraine should not have allowed it. They should have kept destroying their escape routes the entire time.
    3
  13.  @stream2watch , I remember being afraid that Reagan was going to start a nuclear war when I was in the third grade.
    3
  14.  @r200ti  <—— Extremely confused. Why would Ukraine want to launch a counter offensive when we all know that the offensive side needs a minimum of 3x more troops and artillery. And apparently Russia needs 10x the artillery to advance at the pace of a crippled snail. The smartest plan for Ukraine is to let Russia keep struggling for every inch until they’ve been so demilitarized that a counter offensive could be won with a few thousand troops. Then they can march in and take everything with practically no resistance or casualties. If you had half a brain, you’d sew that Ukraine is doing exactly what they should do, and Russia is losing.
    3
  15. Russia blew up the pipelines so that they could blame the US for two reasons. 1) Tell it's people that the US is attacking Russian infrastructure. 2) Piss off Europe because the US cut off their gas, so now they're gonna freeze. This plan only works if they can convince everyone that the US did it, and there's a gas shortage this winter. If there's no gas shortage, Europe won't care who blew it up. If there is a gas shortage, but Russia is unable to convince Europe that the US did it, then Europe will blame someone else.
    3
  16.  @bjrnalmestad4563 , If they let Russia defeat Ukraine, they will be.
    3
  17.  @major__kong , Ships are useless in this war.
    3
  18.  @a5cent , Actually, the EU does have a mutual defense component. I just don’t know the details.
    3
  19.  @a5cent , No EU member has been attacked or invaded, so the defensive component of EU membership hasn’t been triggered. If Ukraine becomes an EU member, that’s nearly equivalent to being a NATO member. However, I don’t know what happens if an EU member that’s not a NATO member is attacked, so all of the EU comes to that member’s defense. Then this results in an EU member being attacked. Would this then trigger article 5?
    3
  20.  @zorrofox8950 , Then Zelensky can offer Trump Russia’s rare earth minerals.
    3
  21.  @ericp1139 , You’re confused and don’t understand what “conflict of interest” means. What are your thoughts regarding Elon and DOGE?
    3
  22.  @Lasse65 , If Russia voluntarily withdraws from Ukraine but not Crimea, then Ukraine will invade Crimea and Russia will have defend Crimea. I don’t believe that a voluntary withdrawal that doesn’t include Crimea is an option. The only way Russia would be able to continue to occupy Crimea would be for this to end at the negotiation table and Ukraine agrees to allow Russia to continue to occupy Crimea. And that would only happen if Russia isn’t completely defeated, or if the west withdraws support for Ukraine and forces them to accept such a deal.
    3
  23.  @pilotmanpaul , Russia is losing bro…
    3
  24.  @michealbaker8216 , So by “fortifications” you actually mean “trenches”? Are trenches really that difficult to make? Ever heard of a “Ditch Witch”?
    3
  25.  @neilcreamer8207 , He’s referring to the forest fire satellite images. They show how many fires are on either side of the front lines in Ukraine. Before the Ukrainians received the HIMARS and started taking out Russian ammo depots and supply lines there were significantly more fires on the Ukrainian side of the front lines. That changed very quickly after the Ukrainians received the HIMARS which is an indication of how effective the HIMARS have been at reducing the availability of Russian artillery rounds on the front lines.
    3
  26.  @jlvandat69 , Exactly.
    2
  27. Maybe Trump knows that Russia is on its last leg. That the longer this war drags on, the more desperate Putin will become. So maybe Trump is leading Putin to believe that he has a chance so Putin will continue to squander all of Russia’s resources on this war until Russia has nothing left. Time is on Ukraine’s side.
    2
  28. Oil refineries do not produce oil, so eliminating them will not increase oil prices. If Ukraine were to target Russian oil production, then oil prices might increase. However, if oil prices increase, OPEC will stop decreasing production so that oil prices will stabilize.
    2
  29.  @knightrider693 , Yeah. Only 6 times. That’s not that bad, right?
    2
  30.  @az2man , Right. Maybe Trump is a political genius who hasn’t revealed himself yet. Maybe Trump knows that Russia is on its last leg. That the longer this war drags on, the more desperate Putin will become. So maybe Trump is leading Putin to believe that he has a chance so Putin will continue to squander all of Russia’s resources on this war until Russia has nothing left. Time is on Ukraine’s side.
    2
  31. “Why are there politicians in the west talking about peace talks.” There are obviously some incompetent politicians in the west.
    2
  32. Putin wasted over $400 million worth of missiles to kill 11 Ukrainian civilians. He’s obviously not too bright.
    2
  33.  @tomk3732 , If Russia uses nukes regardless of why the United States and NATO will strike back. They are not obligated by NATO to help Poland invade Belarus, but they are obliged to help Poland if Russia attacks or nukes Poland. Nukes would be Russia’s only option to help Belarus defend against a liberation from Lukanhesko’s dictatorship by Poland because they don’t have any other military resources to offer any other help. But because the United States and NATO would get involved, Putin would not nuke Poland to defend Belarus.
    2
  34.  @aaronbaker2186 , Absolutely!!
    2
  35.  @unoriginalname4321 , LOL
    2
  36.  @Homobikerus , They closed the gates a long time ago because it took 8 months for the reservoir to become overfilled. If Russia didn’t want the reservoir overfilled, they would have opened the gates, not closed them.
    2
  37.  @arthurmoore9488 , “I would have enough troops to keep them pinned in and bleeding, then go for a surprise offensive somewhere else.” That’s exactly what I’d do. In fact, I’d start a surprise offense in one area first to get Russia to move their troops, then also attack wherever they moved those troops from. I’d wait for a whole bunch of freshly trained troops come from the UK, US, and elsewhere first so they could participate. I’d also be training a whole bunch of fresh new troops in Ukraine for these two surprise offensives.
    2
  38.  @Chaldon-hl6yk , Not when there are 20-25,000 enemy troops trapped on the wrong side of the bridge.
    2
  39.  @tomk3732 , “Only the deck is damaged.” So? Are you a structural engineer? Obviously not. So why didn’t he show us the whole bridge? Why focus real close on only two holes? Was he trying to hide all the damage?
    2
  40.  @tomk3732 , HIMARS are not rockets. HIMARS are trucks. Go educate yourself bro.
    2
  41.  @tomk3732 , HIMARS is a truck bro. There are other vehicles that accept the same rocket modules as the HIMARS. The benefit of the HIMARS is that it’s faster and smaller than the other vehicles, so they are “Highly Mobile” compared to the other vehicles. This is important because once you fire the rockets the enemy can see with their radar where you are, so you need to move quickly before they start shooting back at you. This allows you to fire the rockets from closer to the front lines, within artillery range of the enemy, which in turn allows you to shoot at targets deeper behind enemy lines. You really should educate yourself so you actually know what you’re talking about. And if replacing the deck on a bridge is so easy, why hasn’t Russia done it yet? What’s taking them so long?
    2
  42.  @goenzoy712 , So I went and looked up Russian gold. It turns out that they produce around 300 tons per year, not 1000, and Russia’s largest gold producer make around $2 billion profit per quarter, or $8 billion per year.
    2
  43.  @TheSteinbitt , Forcing everyone to work for cheap rather than asking them to work and offering more money would prevent the inflation that’s caused by increasing salaries.
    2
  44.  @helgeschneider9069 , When I was a kid my uncle gave me a 35 mm camera that was made in Russia.
    2
  45.  @KennethOram-ei9ff , What western pressure are you referring to?
    2
  46. It can end while Putin is alive, but Russia needs to be utterly defeated.
    2
  47. Ukraine needs 50 Patriot Systems and 1000 Gepards so Russia can’t bomb Ukraine any more.
    2
  48. So you believe that Russia’s economy is doing great and that Russia’s Soviet stockpiles will last forever? There question isn’t if, but when. Anyone who believes otherwise is obviously delusional.
    2
  49. You probably don’t understand that over 20% of Russia’s GDP is coming from Russia’s sovereign wealth fund. 2/3rds of the sovereign wealth fund has already been spent. Do you have any idea what will happen when the money runs out? I bet you don’t. It seems like you lack the capacity to understand these things.
    2
  50.  @vasilispatsalidis5683 , He is informed. That’s why he’s correct. Russia’s military and economy are both jokes.
    2