Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @danielhutchinson6604  <—— Extremely confused..
    2
  2. Do you actually believe that the Russian economy is doing well? Are you really that delusional?
    2
  3.  @diogorodrigues747 , I hope you’re right about Europe ramping up production as we speak. It’s about time. The United States is really screwing up. They had a lot of power because they were the source of the majority of military equipment. After this fiasco, that will no longer be the case. In the future there will be a lot fewer jobs in the defense sector in the United States as those jobs will now be in Europe.
    2
  4.  @evgeniya7853 , You are delusional.
    2
  5.  @traumvonhaiti , “Russia has a capable military.” Hahahahahahaha!!!! Good one bro!!!
    2
  6. Obviously Putin isn’t as smart as people thought.
    2
  7.  @a5cent , So basically NATO is lame. What about the EU? Doesn’t the EU also have a defense agreement between members?
    2
  8.  @a5cent , What this all about? “The Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) is the European Union's (EU) course of action in the fields of defence and crisis management, and a main component of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).”
    2
  9.  @a5cent , What’s the last word in the following quote? “course of action in the fields of defence”
    2
  10.  @a5cent , What does the following mean? “The CSDP also entails collective self-defence amongst member states”
    2
  11.  @a5cent , What’s the “EDU”? “and sometimes referred to as the European Defence Union (EDU)”
    2
  12.  @a5cent , I’m pretty sure you know how you use the Internet, so you can find this stuff yourself if you want to.
    2
  13. @YeshuaIsMyKing79823, The S300s, S400s, and S500s are pathetic. That’s why Russian oil refineries are exploding over 1,000 miles from Ukraine.
    2
  14.  @mirekslechta7161 , Really? NATO has no ammo, no artillery, and no tanks, and Russia still can’t defeat Ukraine. Are you claiming that the Russian military is that pathetic that they can’t defeat a completely defenseless country with no military equipment or amount?
    2
  15.  @fyrchmyrddin1937 , Interesting point of view.
    2
  16.  @zorrofox8950 , Are minerals better when mined by small children?
    2
  17.  Truth Be Told , Ukraine was never part of Russia. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. Russia was also part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine started the Soviet Union, not Russia. Therefore, maybe Russia should surrender their country to Ukraine. Putin should just give up and let Zelensky be president of both Ukraine and Russia.
    2
  18.  @davidfaraday7963 , Ukraine was never part of Russia. Both Russia and Ukraine were part of the Soviet Union. Claiming that Ukraine was part of Russia is like claiming that Florida was part of California.
    2
  19.  @davidfaraday7963 , The Russian Empire? That’s ancient history. And Ukraine founded the Soviet Union after WW1.
    2
  20.  @michealbaker8216 , Russia is shelling 70,000 rounds a day and Ukraine only 10,000? Then why isn’t the front lines moving? Do Russians have bad aim or something?
    2
  21.  @michealbaker8216 , So Ukraine is winning because they are experts at building fortifications? What if they are building new better fortifications behind the ones they spent 8 years building? And what if they are building more behind those? Or do you believe that they’ve been doing absolutely nothing to prepare for the possibility that Russia might break though those fortifications?
    2
  22.  @michealbaker8216 , What do these incredible fortifications look like? Do you have any pictures or videos that show them?
    2
  23.  @pilotmanpaul , “They can’t” I guess you have no clue what a “Ditch Witch” is.
    2
  24.  @michealbaker8216 , Did you bother looking up what a Ditch Witch is?
    2
  25.  @michealbaker8216 , If by “fortifications” you mean trenches, then one guy can dig all the trenches you could ever want within a few weeks using a Ditch Witch. I suppose the Russians don’t have and have never heard of such advanced technology, so they believe that it takes 8 years to dig a few trenches.
    2
  26.  @michealbaker8216 , You obviously still don’t understand what a Ditch Witch is. It’s not a guy with a shovel.
    2
  27.  @attilamarics4808 , It’s Russian state TV and other government news sources. They’re all working for Putin to spread FUD and other nonsense.
    1
  28. “Both sides believe they’re winning.” If the west increases support for Ukraine, then Ukraine wins sooner. If the west deceases support, it takes longer. The only chance Russia has is that the west completely stops supporting Ukraine.
    1
  29. Trump is obviously delusional.
    1
  30. Or maybe Trump knows that Russia is on its last leg. That the longer this war drags on, the more desperate Putin will become. So maybe Trump is leading Putin to believe that he has a chance so Putin will continue to squander all of Russia’s resources on this war until Russia has nothing left. Time is on Ukraine’s side.
    1
  31. Vladolf Putler is assuming that Europeans haven’t yet discovered wood stoves and blankets. To spare the economy, Europe should cut off gas for domestic use. Let them use their wood stoves and blankets.
    1
  32. After a 6 month delay, it should have been increased to at least $120B. $200B would have been better. By the way, it’s old outdated weapons that are being sent, not cash. The money to manufacture them was spent already 20, 30, and 40 years ago. The money will go to develop new more modern weapons, then manufacture those.
    1
  33. The United States already needs to replace their old outdated weapons with new modern ones anyway, so the money needs to be spent regardless.
    1
  34. Everyone in Russia who pays taxes is contributing to this war. That makes them all valid military targets. The question isn’t whether it’s “legal” or not. If Russians want it to stop, they can always withdraw from Ukraine.
    1
  35. Who said that China will collapse in 31 days? What’s your source for this?
    1
  36.  @jlvandat69 , There have been no votes among the population of the United States about whether the United States should or shouldn’t support Ukraine. We voted for our government a few years ago, and now they do whatever they want regardless of what the population wants, similar to a dictatorship. Supposedly our government cares what the population wants, but the fact is they only care what their biggest donors want which is often unrelated to what the population wants.
    1
  37.  @zigagolob4045 , Russia invaded Crimea. All the anti-Russian Ukrainian who lived there fled, were killed, or were sent to concentration camps in Russia. They were the majority before the invasion. Obviously the vote was not valid. In Kyiv the population revolted and overthrew Putin’s puppet. If Crimea did not want to be part of Ukrainian they could have done he same thing without Russians invading and forcing them to be part of Russia. You’re obviously confusing the facts. Most likely because you’re a Russian Nazi.
    1
  38. So basically you want to weaken the United States a Nd strengthen Europe? Why? Are you European, or American?
    1
  39.  @robgrey6183 , Do you know that the weapons that we’ve been giving Ukraine were paid for and manufactured 20, 30, 40, and 50 years ago for the purpose of a potential war with the Soviet Union? They were expensive, but we’re not going to get a refund. The money is gone already and now because of China we need new weapons. If there’s a war with China, we won’t be using tanks and artillery, so what do you believe we should do with that stuff? Throw it in the ocean? Maybe we should let Putin take Ukraine so he can rebuild the Soviet Union so all that old outdated already paid for equipment can become useful again.
    1
  40.  @robgrey6183 , Oh. I see. You believe we can solve homelessness, hunger, and poverty with a bunch of old tanks and artillery. Can you explain how that works?
    1
  41.  @robgrey6183 , The weapons we’ve given Ukraine were paid for by your grandparents’ taxes, not yours. The weapons were manufactured years ago. We’re not going to get a refund, so it makes no difference to your or my taxes whether we give that old outdated equipment to Ukraine or we toss it in the ocean. So how’s your comment about roads relevant?
    1
  42.  @robgrey6183 , The weapons we’ve given Ukraine were paid for by your grandparents’ taxes, not yours. The weapons were manufactured years ago. We’re not going to get a refund, so it makes no difference to your or my taxes whether we give that old outdated equipment to Ukraine or we toss it in the ocean. So how’s your comment about roads, bridges, schools, abs border defense relevant? Do you believe that we need tanks, artillery, and HIMARS for border defense? Is the invasion from Mexico really that bad?
    1
  43.  @azazel166 , Actually, that’s probably what this fool wants.
    1
  44.  @azazel166 , Actually that’s what this full wants.
    1
  45. F
    1
  46. O
    1
  47. O
    1
  48. L
    1
  49.  @robgrey6183 , The weapons we’ve given Ukraine were paid for by your grandparents’ taxes, not yours. The weapons were manufactured years ago. We’re not going to get a refund, so it makes no difference to your or my taxes whether we give that old outdated equipment to Ukraine or we toss it in the ocean. So how’s your comment about roads, bridges, schools, and border defense relevant? Do you believe that we need tanks, artillery, and HIMARS for border defense? Is the invasion from Mexico really that bad?
    1
  50.  @robgrey6183 , Do you understand why your grandparent’s taxes were spent manufacturing those weapons? Are you familiar with something called “The Cold War”? Why would you want to allow Putin to rebuild the Soviet Union? Do you miss spending our taxes on The Cold War? You want us to do that again?
    1