Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1.  @Jamesthechef0311 , These turtle tanks are only useful against drones and possibly Javelins. Artillery will go right through them. During Ukraine’s artillery shortage they gave Russia an advantage. Now that Ukraine has started receiving more artillery, it’s pointless.
    1
  2. ​ @wolfswinkel8906 , Over 1,000 per day. That's around 35,000 per month.
    1
  3. ​ @wolfswinkel8906 , They have been recruiting around 30,000 per month, right? Just barely enough to keep up with losses.
    1
  4.  @gregoryfilin8040 , We absolutely do know this for sure.
    1
  5.  @wolfswinkel8906 , I'm counting. Why?
    1
  6.  @wolfswinkel8906 , You know I'm taking about the Russian loses because you know I'm right.
    1
  7.  @wolfswinkel8906 , It's over 1,000 per day bro. You can believe it or not. It makes no difference. What you believe has no influence on the outcome of this war that Putin started.
    1
  8.  @wolfswinkel8906 , Why don't you explain why Putin is now mobilizing another 180,000 recruits?
    1
  9.  @wolfswinkel8906 , You don't have to trust me. I don't care and it makes no difference. But why is Puttin mobilizing 180,000 new recruits? Is he running low on volunteers? Please explain?
    1
  10.  @wolfswinkel8906 , I've asked you a question. It's obvious that you're refusing to answer because you obviously don't like the answer. Russia has about 1 year to 1.5 years of old antique tanks left. Then they'll either run out, or have to seriously ramp up production. So far Russia has depleted around 70% of their Soviet stockpiles. It took the Soviet Union over 50 years to manufacture those stockpiles, so it's impossible for Russia to replace them at the rate needed.
    1
  11.  @wolfswinkel8906 , Hahahaha... Ukraine just recently reduced their minimum conscription age from 27 to 25. All your numbers are all off too. You probably got your numbers straight from the Kremlin. By the way, did you see that mushroom cloud the other day? It was incredibly impressive, wasn't it?
    1
  12.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The end will come when Putin withdraws his troops from Ukraine.
    1
  13.  @gregoryfilin8040 , If you wanted it to end, you’d tell Putin to leave Ukraine alone.
    1
  14.  @kirtonos , Well, Ukraine has only 3 men left, but fortunately these 3 men are superheroes who are holding off the entire Russian army with their bare hands.
    1
  15.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The war ends when Putin withdraws his invaders from Ukraine. This is nothing more than a fact. It has nothing to do with any “viewpoint”.
    1
  16.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The war ends when Putin withdraws his invaders from Ukraine. This is nothing more than a fact. It has nothing to do with any “viewpoint”.
    1
  17.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The war ends when Putin withdraws his invaders from Ukraine. This is nothing more than a fact. It has nothing to do with any “viewpoint”.
    1
  18.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The war ends as soon as Putin’s invaders withdraw from Ukraine. This is a fact, not anyone’s “viewpoint”.
    1
  19.  @gregoryfilin8040 , The war ends as soon as Putin’s invaders withdraw from Ukraine.
    1
  20.  @ingamgoduka57 , Did you forget about the Kharkiv counter offensive?
    1
  21.  @joshgulrud , Weren’t they’re 3 in one day the other day?
    1
  22.  @attilamarics3374 , So basically you can’t handle the truth, so you prefer your delusions? You know that it makes no difference what you believe. Ukraine will soon have air superiority.
    1
  23.  @attilamarics3374 , Can you explain Russia’s advanced hypersonic missiles haven’t been able to take out a single Patriot systems? Why is the Patriot system able eliminate Russia’s most advanced missiles?
    1
  24.  @attilamarics3374 , Duhhh… because they’re still there. Obviously Russia would take them out if two could, and obviously Russia’s missiles would be hitting their targets. Obviously Russia can’t, because the Patriots are incredibly effective against Russia’s pathetic technology.
    1
  25.  @attilamarics3374 , Duhhh… Because they’re still there. Obviously Russia would take them out if two could, and obviously Russia’s missiles would be hitting their targets. Obviously Russia can’t, because the Patriots are incredibly effective against Russia’s pathetic technology.
    1
  26.  @attilamarics3374 , Duhhh… Because they’re still there. Obviously Russia would take them out if two could, and obviously Russia’s missiles would be hitting their targets. Obviously Russia can’t, because the Patriots are incredibly effective against Russia’s pathetic technology.
    1
  27.  @attilamarics3374 , Duhhh… Because they’re still there.
    1
  28.  @attilamarics3374 , Obviously Russia would take them out if two could, and obviously Russia’s missiles would be hitting their targets.
    1
  29.  @attilamarics3374 , Obviously Russia can’t, because the Patriots are incredibly effective against Russia’s pathetic technology.
    1
  30. Putin obviously don’t give a chit about Russia’s economy.
    1
  31.  @Ereshkigal616 , Advanced Russian technology is a myth. Even if Russia’s nukes work, Russia has absolutely nothing that the United States can’t shoot down, and the United States has plenty that Russia can’t.
    1
  32.  @nonyabisness6306 , Right. Ukraine is demilitarizing Russia using old junk from the west. If Vladolf Putler messes with any NATO member countries, then Russia is screwed.
    1
  33.  @nonyabisness6306 , “because we don’t actually want them firing into Russia, as that would…” I’m sure that’s just an excuse. There’s likely other things going on behind the scenes. Like maybe the Ukrainians just need training and experience before they receive more powerful weapons. Or maybe they want Vladolf Putler to believe that Ukraine won’t get the long range missiles. If I were running things, the public would be fed nothing but lies meant to misinform Vladolf.
    1
  34.  @joshuamitchell1733 , The “Ukrainian troops fighting for Russia” don’t exist. They are Russians who moved to Crimea and Donbas between 2014 and today, and they are being forced to the front lines to act as cannon fodder. They don’t want to be there. There is no “civil war” in Ukraine. Russia invaded.
    1
  35.  @joshuamitchell1733 , “there is no major defense lines dug in anywhere in the country.” Do you really believe they haven’t spend the last 3 months digging? Or do you believe that Ukrainians are stew pid?
    1
  36.  @useryggfdcc , “Russian nukes will fly!” Maybe, but in which direction? Have you seen the videos of Russian rockets making U-turns?
    1
  37.  @anthonymcmxcviii6549 , As long as this war remains within Ukraine’s borders, Russian citizens can see through Vladolf Putler’s lies, and see that this is Russia invading Ukraine. Then they have a legitimate reason to be against this war and the majority will not want to join Putler’s Nazi army and fight in Ukraine. If Ukraine starts going after Russia, then Vladolf might be able to use that to convince Russian citizens that they need to defend their homes from a NATO attack. Then he might be able to scare them into joining his Nazi army. It’s not a good idea. It’s best to focus on Russian targets within Ukraine. The longer this war is Russia invading Ukraine, the better it is for the information warfare side of things. Ukraine does not need to turn the Russian people into an enemy.
    1
  38.  @joshuamitchell1733 , Russian involvement in Ukraine started when they invaded and took Crimea and part of Donbas in 2014 when they faked a revolution with their civilian clothed soldiers.
    1
  39. Don't you need shovels to dig trenches?
    1
  40.  @realpolitiksanta5980  <—— Clueless fool.
    1
  41.  @RantTheRetort , If you believe China and India are Russia’s friends or allies, you’re delusional. Just because they’re willing to take advantage of Russia when the opportunity arrises, doesn’t mean their allies.
    1
  42. That would be Putin. He’s trying to start WW3. The west is trying to prevent WW3.
    1
  43.  @e33d90 , Then what should we do with a tyrannical dictator starts invading its neighbors? Let them keep growing until they become a threat to global peace?
    1
  44.  @andrewstewart9263 , It’s funny how you people don’t understand how stew pid Putin is. It’s probably because y’all are just as stew pid, so you can’t see it. All the smart Russians left Russia already. There are now none left.
    1
  45.  @MasterBlasterSr , Neither China nor India are Russia’s allies. Just because these two countries are too poor to refuse to buy cheap Russian oil doesn’t mean they’re Russia’s allies. You’re obviously extremely confused. In fact, it’s extremely likely that, after Ukraine has finished demilitarizing Russia, China might liberate Manchuria and Siberia from Putin’s tyranny. Xi is merely waiting for his opportunity. Both of these countries will do what’s in their own best interest, and it’s not in their best interest to support a country as pathetic as Russia. Russia has half as much oil as Canada, yet 4 times the population. Russia is not a wealthy country.
    1
  46. @@markbranham7355, So what? Who cares? They’re still not allies.
    1
  47. @@markbranham7355, Are you stew pid enough to believe that because China and India are both SCO members they are also allies? Tell me. I’d like to know how stew pid you are.
    1
  48. LOL
    1
  49.  @prfwrx2497 , LOL
    1
  50.  @TheSecondInitiate , Russian position are “heavily fortified” with small worthless concrete pyramids.
    1