General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Terje Oseberg
Good Times Bad Times
comments
Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Good Times Bad Times" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
@skp8748 , Is Syria part of the United States?
2
@BonsaiBlacksmith , When did Guam become a US territory? How about Samoa? When did they become a US territory?
2
@neikercontreras2008 , Absolutely… In fact, Ukraine was one of the founding members of the Soviet Union. That means that Ukraine owns Russia just as much as Russia owns Ukraine. They are equals.
2
@neikercontreras2008 , Exactly…
2
@matt-eu-poland , Also, most Russians do not support this war. Many of them already left Russia, and many more still want to leave.
2
@Nathanos355 , Biden needs to grow a pair.
2
@brainletfag , How do you know that there are still troops stuck in Zolote and Hirske?
2
@machtschnell7452 , They were “evacuated”. They withdrew in an orderly fashion during the night.
2
@Sacrvm Imperivm Britannicvm, You’re confused and wrong. They would fight, because they would believe that they have a chance. And they would have been correct, because they did escape, and likely killed several Russians and destroyed Russian equipment during their escape.
2
@Silver_Prussian , If Russia doesn’t move troops from Donbas to defend Kursk, where will Russia move them from? Or do you believe Russia will mobilize another round of new soldiers? How long will that take? What do to believe Russia will/should do?
2
If?
2
@jahlahbrine843 , For less 3% of the United State’s annual budget worth of old outdated military equipment, this is what Ukraine has achieved.
1
@mitchyoung93 , Almost 2 years, over 50% is not what you’ve heard until today. Keep coping though, if it makes to feel better. Russia has about a year or two left, and then they’re finished.
1
@jahlahbrine843 , What the United States has given Ukraine has been old outdated equipment that was paid for years ago. The value of this old outdated equipment is less than 3% of the United States annual military budget. It’s barely noticeable.
1
@ffbeexaid4509 , It’s more than 50%, not 50%, “over 50%”. You don’t have to believe it. It’s true regardless, and Russia knows that it’s true regardless of what you choose to believe.
1
@haxeplays9962 , You obviously don’t understand what “over half” means. Is English your second language? “Depleted over half” doesn’t mean they’ve run out. Maybe you need to grow a brain…
1
@nikola.1903 , American war crimes in those countries aren’t even comparable to Russian war crimes in Ukraine.
1
@JackFromWyoming , Russia has been experiencing unsustainable losses for over a year. How much longer do you believe Russia can keep it up before they’ve completely depleted their Soviet stockpiles and squandered Russia’s sovereign wealth fund?
1
@JackFromWyoming , Yeah. It’s quite obvious that 48 year old Ukrainian soldiers are significantly more skilled than the untrained incompetent 28 year old Russian soldiers.
1
@JackFromWyoming , The 48 year old experienced Ukrainian soldiers are obviously significantly more competent than the untrained inexperienced 28 year old Russian soldiers. That’s clearly why Ukraine is winning.
1
@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 , Everyone knows that Russia is a threat, and that Ukraine is making the world a better/safer place by demilitarizing Russia.
1
@allydea , Russia is not a threat. Russia’s nukes don’t work, and Russia’s military is pathetic.
1
@glennv3176 , Hungary is the most corrupt country in Europe. Their voting rights should be suspended until they resolve their issues with corruption.
1
@justinmolsal5613 , Hungary isn’t supportive of Russia. Only Orban is. Orban is Putin’s puppet. Putin probably installed him using corruption.
1
Russia doesn’t have air superiority. Neither side has air superiority.
1
Both Russia and Ukraine keep their aircraft on their side of the front lines and at low altitude when they are close to the front lines so they don’t get shot down. Many are getting shot down anyway.
1
If Venezuela amasses their military by the border of Guyana, the United States should Elim.
1
Vade, then tell them that they’re not allowed to do that.
1
@SavageDragon999 , That was back when everyone believed that Putin’s nukes worked. Now we know that everyone who maintained Putin’s nukes died of old age before the Soviet Union collapsed.
1
@LeechofCrows , Russia is losing. Losing is future continuous tense. That means that they haven’t loose yet, but eventually, some time in the future, they will have lost. The west bailed out the Soviet Union when they were invaded by Germany, and now the west is bailing out Ukraine when they were invaded by Russia. By the way, Hitler didn’t start WW2 alone. He started it together with Staling when they both invaded Poland together. Had Stalin not done that, there likely wouldn’t have been a WW2, and then there wouldn’t have been a need to bail out Stalin.
1
@LeechofCrows , Russia is losing. Losing is future continuous tense. That means that they haven’t loose yet, but eventually, some time in the future, they will have lost. The west bailed out the Soviet Union when they were invaded by Germany, and now the west is bailing out Ukraine when they were invaded by Russia. By the way, Hitler didn’t start WW2 alone. He started it together with Staling when they both invaded Poland together. Had Stalin not done that, there likely wouldn’t have been a WW2, and then there wouldn’t have been a need to bail out Stalin.
1
@herptek , And now Ukraine is defeating Russia using old scraps trickled in from the west.
1
@LeechofCrows , What do you believe? Do you believe that Germany invaded Poland, then the Soviet Union marched in to defend Poland from Germany? Do you believe that the Germans were the “bad guys” and that the Soviets were the “good guys”? Why don’t you educate me and tell me what really happened in 1939?
1
@LeechofCrows , Do you know about all the frozen chicken that the United States sent to Russia after the Soviet Union collapsed? That was obviously a mistake. The United States should have let nature take its course. The world would be much better off today if the United States let the Russians fend for themselves.
1
@FEDEXLuchs , The United States won in Afghanistan, and they did it in only 6 weeks. The problem was that the Taliban ran and hid in Pakistan for 20 years, and the United States was unwilling to go into Pakistan to get them. They didn’t “lose”, they simply failed to achieve their objectives because they were unwilling to do what was necessary to achieve their objectives. They could have but decided not to. In 20 years the US lost 2400 soldiers in Afghanistan. This would not be the case had it been a 20 year long war that the US lost. You need to educate yourself before spewing nonsense. The Soviet Union’s pathetic military, however, lost in Afghanistan and ran away with their tails between their legs like the incompetent cowards that they are.
1
@LeechofCrows , Russia’s propaganda was so good that even Putin believed Russia’s propaganda. Had he known the truth, he would have invaded Ukraine.
1
@LeechofCrows , I bet Putin believes his nukes work too.
1
@LeechofCrows , “They still haven’t lost bro.” Yet. They are, however, losing. They’ve been losing since they started. It’s only a matter of time. Russia will run out of resources, the west won’t.
1
@herptek , At least I know the facts.
1
@JackFromWyoming , “Do you know the average age of a UK soldier is 48.” Duhhhh… That’s what happens when you limit the draft to everyone 27 and older. Do numbers confuse you? Did you fail 3rd grade math?
1
@JackFromWyoming , You’re very confused. The Soviet Union lost. The west could have easily taken everything. The only reason the Soviet Union existed after WW2 and Stalin was allowed to remain in charge is because the west didn’t care to continue the war. They could have easily defeated the Soviet Union if they wanted to. What you don’t seem to understand is that the west doesn’t want war.
1
@JackFromWyoming , “Average age of 48 does not sound combat effective….” And yet they’re defeating the Russians.
1
@JackFromWyoming , Russia is squandering their equipment, money, and soldiers faster than they can be replaced. This is exactly how you lose a war of attrition. Do you understand what a war of attrition is?
1
@LeechofCrows , “that’s paraphrasing” Yup. You’re definitely confused.
1
@LeechofCrows , My claim is that before February 2022, everyone believed that Russia had a substantial military, not a bunch of incompetent buffoons with old crappy equipment that barely works.
1
@LeechofCrows , Another of my claims is that everyone believed that Ukraine didn’t have a substantial military and that they’d be steamrolled by the Russian military. Everyone was obviously wrong.
1
@JackFromWyoming <—— Obviously a brainwashed Russian troll.
1
@MarionFR , His first comment disappeared. I wonder if he deleted it. I wonder if he has deleted others.
1
@LeechofCrows , Before February 2022, I hadn’t even thought about it. I hadn’t even heard of Ukraine. When the Invasion began, I was immediately on Ukraine’s side because Ukraine had not attacked Russia and Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia was obviously the “bad guys”. After a few weeks, it became obvious to me that Ukraine was winning, and I made a bet with a friend who’s still convinced that Russia will win.
1
@LeechofCrows , What are you claiming that people predicted over a decade ago? That Russia would invade Ukraine? Or that Ukraine would fight back and win?
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All