Comments by "Crime Stoppers" (@crimestoppers1877) on "Dr. Todd Grande" channel.

  1. 20
  2. 12
  3. 10
  4. These are interesting definitions, but you have not included "organized" individual stalking. I am speaking about forensic or "legal stalking" aka " sub rosa" or under the rose. Your description of observing and following is partially correct but it is not always by " the (one) stalker" being physically present. This sub rosa activity can be continual or continuous for many years 24/7/365. With electronic social media today it is not required to be physically present at all times. Your inclusion of "contact, calling, texting, email" is poorly defined in this regard.. During a sub rosa investigation, the target is rarely contacted directly unless it is a type of legal pretextual contact. Also it is usually agreed by legal counsel (civil and administrative laws and not criminal laws where most anything goes) to not DIRECTLY encourage the target to engage in certain activities: Note the exemption of "allegations of potential crimes". In other words, an associate of the target could legally be contacted with lets say 2-3 Free seats at a major sporting event. if the target somehow gets invited by the associate - roommate, romantic partner or other person to accompany them ( where they no longer use a cane or wheel chair to root for their favorite team or players. it may be legally permissible in most legal venues. Yes, that can be defined as a "contact" but by whom? and for what purpose? Sub rosa investigators are careful to never get "picked" by the target. They can get "picked" frequently usually by people who THINK they are targets. Usually others who are involved in some other activity that they do not want discovered ( A lot of stuff is going on out there. Drugs extramarital affairs etc) The result, is other individuals replace the investigator. I have seen over a dozen different investigators on one sub rosa assigment. When does this occur? Pre employment investigations, insurance investigations, lawsuits and legal matters of all types, (Insurance applications. claims and witnesses), bank investigations, loan investiagtions, workers compensation, welfare benefits, school districts ( assure proper district residence), domestic investigations, corporate, governmental, medicare, physicians, counselors chiropractors, political and many judicial matters including child custody. In any medium or larger size city there can be literally hundreds of these sub rosa investigations conducted on any day! The point is there is NO repository LIST of investigations for obvious reasons. At times, local police agencies might be notified but what if THEY are the targets (happens all the time especially fake workers compensation or insurance claims). “Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.” quote from Joseph Heller Catch-22.
    7
  5. Thanks for your reports of objective findings on marriage. I have made the rational decision for MGTOW after experiencing a high value marriage. I did not like being a cuckold and so I filed for divorce and fortunately did well financially and emotionally using a unique strategy. My initial goals were to find Peace, Quiet and Freedom and I could no longer accept being a cuckold. The laws today encourage women both single and married to have as many sexual and relationship encounters as they want. The idea is taught in public schools that women decide when and what they do with their bodies and they are the only persons who can evaluate a mans value. That's fine with me. I'll just help these ladies find what they are looking for. This supports the trend for more and more women to use extramarital sex and relationships as a legal and sexual right. In my case I no longer employ women but instead filter my work through a services company which now has the legal responsibility for false claims that may arise by hiring women. I have never been happier in my life! When I want social or sexual contact with women I select only those who are married. This removes divorce and alimony from my life. It also eliminates false allegations in the way I have our meetings arranged. I am no longer the cuckold who brings in the money while she plays around. I agree that the husbands of these ladies are now the cuckolds. Every one of them is a Beta provider and they have no legal alternative but filing for divorce ( most states). This behavior I describe ( cheating wives) is so common and mainstream that there are many popular songs about this state of it's "cheaper to keep her" . Most men when confronted with wives like this quickly learn they can be financially destroyed by a divorce. The result is that many just try to look away while she is cheating. From my view, I see two primary "relationship" motives for women ( single and married) : 1) increased asset and social status and 2) amusement entertainment, novelty, chance taking and entitlement. When I recognize these goals among married women, I know that I will have a high probability that she will tell me she is "available" which seems to be the key word these women use to express their intentions. Many wives tell me they love their husbands but just want to have fun. Some of them even brag they were required to sign a prenup before marriage!! Yet they still cheat! This attitude tells me that they do not care about being responsible or accountable for their agreements ( Prenuptial contract and marriage license/vows) . Do I see a correlation with this behavior? Yes! it is the behavior of little girls. If I had a choice it would be less complicated, if women did not use hypergamy and the chase for Chad and Tyrone for entertainment. A high quality honest marriage where loyalty responsibility and accountability were traits of each partner would be ideal. But our laws do not support this. When I mention these character traits women get upset and tell me their husbands or boyfriends tell them the same thing! I see yet another correlation here but your research might learn the responsible schema via Factor Analysis?
    6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8.  @She_McGee  Thats an interesting story. How about this one? I was on a covert sub rosa assignment and I always study the area carefully before going "on point". I noticed a suspicious vehicle that looked like it was on a surveillance operation in the target area, so I watched that. Ha ha it was a federal vehicle ( van) but had an ironic Non Exempt plate ( looks like a non government lic plate) . What was the plate number "2 FBI 007" True story! (two agents on assignment). I have seen WiFi SSID's emitting from surveillance vehicles "FBI Surveillance Van" Some tech in the "radio shop" set this up to help idiots in the field connect their gear. Do you want to be paranoid for a long time? I have a hint that will keep your mind busy. Notice the street lights in your area. Many have been replaced with LED lamps. Look on the top surface and notice a small plastic bubble usually blue, white, brown or beige colored. It looks like a small Hockey puck. Yup embedded inside are covert network cameras powered by the same supply as the LED luminaire. These contain the photocell On Off switch for the lights but can contain a micro D/N HD camera. Tens of thousands are in operation daily. A van or suv is no longer required. Sit back and watch from anywhere. Don't look for a van, look for a street light. How do they get there? The module has a Quick release screw on and off that can be placed in about 30 seconds one you use a boom truck to reach it. Usually at night or in darkness. Have fun. You will never NOT be paranoid now.
    5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. Interesting presentation. I have no opinion about UFO's, aliens or Bob Lazar or his claims. I do have experiences and knowledge concerning some of your questions, speculations and findings: 1) Education: His education could have been be via a non accredited school? You implied this in your analysis. 2) Government secrecy: I disagree with you about your statement using a "statistical" view about a large group of people not being able to leak classified information. Statistics relies on accuracy from unclassified data sets. Where is the data to analyze? There are thousands of projects that are SCI Sensitive Compartmented Information. From the 1950's to present many are projects not subject to Declassification reviews. On April 26, 2018 President Trump refused to declassify additional classified documents relating to the assassination of President Kennedy in November 22 1963. This is more than 56 years after his death No unfounded speculation is needed for this FACT. Are you using "magical thinking" to support the idea that there are no secret government activities to be concerned about ? You assert that " Many people like Bob Lazar" would have revealed facts only known to participants and classified government documents. 3) I have no information "that UFO's are real". Where do you get this fact? I have no interest in this topic but do have an interest in reality over fantasy. Adding metaphors about "lizard people" or "flat earthers" does not support your argument about the truthfulness or falsity of Bob Lazar or his comments.
    3
  15. You gave a nice primer for the naive. Lets talk about the real issue. In 2008 a major Wall street market maker was caught by "himself" defrauding investors by many billions of dollars. He had to turn himself in for a fraud that ran for many years. It seems that the company only took customer investments and did not but any stocks, but used the new investment money to pay back those who were getting out of the market and taking their money + substantial profits from the new investors. This is a classic Ponzi scheme with a twist. Investigators had been watching this firm for 8 years and the regulatory agencies refused to adequately audit the firm. Billions of dollars were lost by honest investors for decades, yet NO government or regulatory agency including the US Attorney General, FBI or SEC would lift a finger to stop this criminal activity that even a teen-aged gamer would be smart enough to figure out. Today only one person is in prison and the regulators are smiling at one more job "well done". None were fired for incompetence and the beat goes on encouraging more psychopaths with "Dark Triad" personality traits to continue. Honest workers lose pensions while many "Whale" investors destroy pensions and legitimate firms for greed and amusement. Where are the regulators? Instead we get repeated Mortgage scams, Ponzi schemes and questionable relationships between top government officials who are involved with the same companies. None of this should be a surprise to those who are behind these manipulations. I do understand why so many young investors want to invest in Gamestop. Most have nostalgia for those stores and want to keep them successful for the future. They don't care about psychopaths who short sell to ruin the lives of honest businesses.
    3
  16. 3
  17.  @trulyunbroken7548  I have conducted thousands of investigations. I am assessing reality when I make my observations and that is what I report. Most people have no idea how much real surveillance exists! This is not merely paranoia or fantasy. Not only physical surveillance but the elecronic collection of metadata can actually reveal much more about a target than by interviews and physical surveillance. My background is in laboratory research following the scientific method. We were always concerned about research grants and publications,. There is much higher income earned by studying the behavior of humans instead of laboratory animals. On a side note a typical insurance claim pays much less than the contract requires but this is not ilelgal and actually required by most state laws ie Defend and prevent insurance fraud is the legal pretext. In my studies I found only about 7.5% intentional fraud which is significant above the .05 level but it is no where near the 25% fraud touted in the media. Governments ( all branches) as well as legal venues direct most of this work. One Law school professor advised me that there is ONLY ONE RULE of law that is controlling. "She who has the GOLD makes the Rules". I found this to be accurate and seems to oppose the myth of fair judicial systems. I offer a reference to a recent academic publication book that is not just based on anecotal observations. Read "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism ( 2019) " 750 pages with over 125 pages of references by Emerti Professor of Business at Harvard University Dr Shoshana Zuboff. It is an excellent read but even though ti was printed recently the technology involved has virtually exploded. I do not believe it is possible for countries in the west to recapture any levels of privacy known in the past. it is too late!
    3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24.  @paulgoogol2652  You miss my point! I would prefer a monogamous relationship with ONE woman, however the legal system as well as the media portray the cheating wife as a standard to look up to. Watch any daytime TV show designed for women. If a wife cheats it is only because her husband is A) abusive, B) Ill ( neurological disorders for men are followed by divorce by the wife 80% of the time C) He does not bring in the income she expects or D) She wants a man who can provide more amusement entertainment or novelty. I survived my own situation of a woman who proudly proclaimed she was a feminist and therefore a "Free agent". I used a rare legal method to escape the terror of family courts and attorneys. I filed for divorce and gave her an option she could not refuse saving me lots of wasted time, energy and legal bills. I gave her 110% of any amount she could have asked for her lawyers got upset because they could no longer "build the case" with fake billable hours . No judge would allow this settlement since it would look bad for the court. Now I have Peace Quiet and Freedom and I am very successful financially. Like a Phoenix rising from the ashes. Today I still have excellent relationships women but I must follow rules set down in the law for my defense. 1) I only date married women 2) I Never flirt 3) She is never allowed to visit any of my residences 4) she pays 100% her own expenses. From my experience , most wives cheat to meet one of the two main reasons above : Hypergamy and seeking Novelty. It is unfortunate that fundamentally these are good women yet they cheat because they can with virtually no social or financial costs. In my case, Dr Grandes It was a high value marriage but my wife wanted to exercise her "feminist free will" and have affairs. I see this as a cultural issue instead of a psychological issue. My wife was miserable after the divorce and died younger than expected from chasing her Chads and Tyrones. My participation as an adulterer is only because I am selfish and I enjoy educated, intelligent women and sex and I don't like to play melodramatic legal games. It is that simple. Change the laws and my behavior will change. The husbands are the losers because they will pay alimony if either partner files yielding the trap of "Its cheaper to keep her". That is their dilemma not mine. The unfair laws and the cultural support for deception by women are the problems. Responsibility and Accountability are not in the equation. If you are married, Good Luck. You can be suspicious on her "Girls Night Out" events, since I am right there with the ladies. Wives are WILD!
    2
  25.  @loralu9420  Yes to be frank you are correct! I have several rules, I NEVER flirt and all behavior of mine is requested by the pig. This is to protect myself from Divorce rape and false claims. A married woman can not sue me for alimony and under my circumstances very difficult for her to file false claims ( coitus contracts + recordings) . I also agree that if no man would cheat with the "pigs" how else could the "pigs" cheat? It is a woman's world and this is the result; destruction of the family, morals and modesty. I take full responsibility for MY actions. I am only responding to a very unhealthy situation built by Fifth way Feminism, the media and our political and legal institutions. I would gladly change my behavior if I had some guarantee that I knew that my potential wife would a) refrain from being a slut b) Not being rewarded by society and the law for being a slut and c) Have a societal penalty at least as high of my potential penalties for intentionally violating her promises to be chaste. Watch any daytime TV show marketed to women and listen to the encouragement the audience gives to any woman who is a cheater and any woman who marries for money and divorces for dollars. This does not justify me sleeping with pigs, but it is only one result. Other results include "Single mothers" and the 100,000's of children they bring into this world with no fathers under the guise of "equal rights". How many times should the same a woman appear on national TV to proclaim "YOU are the father of my child!" On her fifteenth appearance we learn that NONE of the men who were accused matched the child's DNA. Who are the Real pigs? If the "pigs" stayed home and did not stray, at least her children would know their real fathers.
    2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. You have a good grasp of many MGTOW ideas however the topic is very broad so that you will find instances to support your thoughts about MGTOW and you will be partially correct . You mentioned Feminism without defining it so let me give you my perspective. I absolutely support gender equality but understand that the latest wave of feminism is more concerned with collectivism than gender equality. Lately the International Communist Part ( Marxist Leninist) is concerned that the attempt at collectivism via a vis the "Feminist Movement" is counter productive to Communist Party organizing. The Communist party wants to define social issues as the Worker vs Capitalist model. You did not mention the long term results if a large population of men decide to not have reproductive sex with women. Is this a 21st century Darwin award for ignorance of the organic evolution of humans? One result is that many women do not plan their 20's well and as a result can end up at age 30 with no male long term prospects with results of storing eggs and using IVF or they just continue through menopause with no pregnancies. Some MGTOW men have responded by donating samples to Sperm banks for IVF clinics. This will allow their DNA to remain in the human genetic pool. You mentioned a few reasons for men to follow this philosophy based on immaturity , low openness and low agreeableness under the Five factor model and you can show this with any small population using your own criteria. The are many MGTOW who are successful financially and socially without these low values of Openness and aggreeableness. Can men love women and care about them and still be MGTOW? Yes of course. Are MGTOW men finding ways to decrease their reliance on state sanctioned Long Term Relationships which favor women and the state? There are several including prostitutes, women who have sex not requiring relationships and married women. In some ways having an affair with married women seems to solve many of the legal issues. A married woman in an affair can not sue her paramour for alimony. In 46 states, the husband of a marriage is legally financially responsible for any children conceived during the marriage regardless of the identity of the sperm donor. You discussed the possibility of paranoid thinking among some MGTOW but did not explain the latest research that shows that as much as 50% of married women have a "Plan B" ( affair) with the man usually being a member of her "Friend zone" who never made it to her "dating" category. Men can understand before they get married the many legal and emotional pitfalls that await them because of state sanctioned marriage . Should all men be forced to donate money to political campaigns to assert their rights as the MRA's have done? Many men want a different approach such as MGTOW. You can not have a war if soldiers refuse to fight. You can not use marriage as a weapon against men if men do not get married. It is that simple, but Fifth wave Feminists do not want to give up their power, control and abuse of men. Many men do not want to spend the time energy and funds required to change laws which are hurtful to men, women and families. Lets look at marriage from the woman's perspective? Are there any legal requirements that require that she NOT have multiple affairs during the marriage yet still receive alimony and support payments? Only one state bars alimony to either party in the case of infidelity of a partner. If this were agreeable in the other 49 states perhaps the MGTOW philosophy would be less popular? Also if EACH state required a DNA test at the time of delivery they could bar financial responsibility to the husband. Just these two simple legal remedies would have a huge effect on the stability of families which provides an advantage to all. Lastly, lets examine the whole # MeToo phenomenon. Our society needs to continue to encourage accurate reporting of abuse and it should also have a concomitant criminal penalty for fraudulent claims of abuse. If the penalties were equal it would deter but not eliminate false claims of abuse. Instead of a written warning and a $500 penalty a false abuse , the claimant should face THE SAME Ten years in prison that men face. What is the rational reason to not enact this type of law? I have met many men who support the MGTOW philosophy and who do not have a Personality Adjustment Order. The idea that believing in an unpopular philosophy is a signal that raises a flag for a personality disorder is on politically dangerous ground. Today many Democrats would like to see Republicans being arrested for not agreeing with them! Congressperson Pelosi made that statement yesterday. Arrest the President for disagreeing with her? Is this Trump Derangement Syndrome?
    2
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1