Comments by "Crime Stoppers" (@crimestoppers1877) on "Dr. Todd Grande" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. From your presentation, I speculate that George was not as intelligent as his wife Diana Carr. George did not have a degree in chemistry as reported in news media stories but instead his degree was in 1971with a BA in Psychology. Why was he called a "chemist" when he only partially fulfilled requirements for a degree in chemistry? Dr. Diana Carr had the brains in the family. Diana was recognized as the first woman Orthopedic Surgeon in the US. Orthopedic Surgery is one of the most difficult medical specialties and out of 20 recognized specialties. Only Neurological surgery and Cardiovascular surgery have higher minimum academic requirements. Not observing the actual witness testimony it is not possible to have an accurate opinion but I do have the opinion that the direct evidence as recorded against George Trepal was not enough for me to assign him a guilty vote. I think it is possible that Dr. Diana Carr could have manipulated the evidence as well as persons involved to position herself as just another victim? Could she be the actual killer? None of the evidence proves that she did not poison Peggy Carr. How can a jury trial prove a negative? By a verdict of Guilty for George Trepal? Also, they could have both been involved. I don't think association with Mensa has anything to do with this case. The media claims about Thalium Nitrate being used as a possible requirement for synthesis or extraction of methamphetamine is not consistent with any published methods. I don't know what really happened, but both Dr Diana Carr and George Trepal had violated several principles used by criminals by not obfuscating their possible involvement. They both talked about their animus toward the Peggy Carr family. Diane may have gotten away with murder, but under a different police investigation and prosecutor there could be different results. Neither was very smart.
    1
  14. 1
  15. What are the potential motives for the murder? I only know the information that you provide in your speculation about this case. I am looking at these events in a wider view. What could be a motive to murder a child? Child pageants involve competition between the children, parents and others associated with these people. What were the competitions, pageants, tryouts and applications for these events? Are there any common relationships with participants, talent scouts, promoters, agents and others involved at the periphery of these events? Who were the pageant winners, losers, dropouts, who when and what are the details? How could any of these people know the dollar amount stated in the alleged ransom note is similar to a bonus for Mr. Ramsey? Did Mr. Ramsey tell anyone about his possible bonus or salary increase? Why? ( a coworker, salesman, competitor). If this occurred, it was most likely within days, weeks or a few months before the murder. Why the rambling and incoherent hostage note? Was it left to conceal the motive for the murder and/or shift suspicion to another? There are more questions to ask. Why wasn't a murder weapon brought to the site if a homicide was planned? A makeshift garotte would require sufficient time, creativity and certain amount of intelligence to identify workable materials to be used as a weapon. What if the method failed? Was there a Plan "B"? Who would gain from this murder? Is it murder for spite ( against the parents or others). The Governor should request a fresh analysis of all data including potential witnesses, informants, tip lines and DNA familial patterns in the community similar to the "Golden State Killer" who was caught this way. More data increases the probability of a solution.
    1