Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "KGW News"
channel.
-
7
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@marcschaeffer1584 Free speech refers to constraints on the government's ability to restrict speech or punish someone for engaging in particular speech. Congress shall make no law. I agree with that. This does not mean that any of us have any obligation to give any platform of any kind to dangerous oppressors. The ARA veterans you just listened to knew that intuitively; as they mentioned, free speech per se never occurred to them, as they feared for their lives!
It was the same thing between the wars, and not just in Germany & Italy. Besides those examples, I always mention Oswald Mosley. His British Union of Fascists wasn't defeated by open debate, nor by peace rallies in a park on the other side of town. No, the BUF creeps were smashed in the streets, by a broad spectrum of Londoners who weren't going to look away. Of course, most of the fighting involved counter-protesters and the police (as usual), but the point is that the BUF realized that they were not getting anywhere without a fight. They could have never have taken power, but can you imagine Mosley's acolytes in Parliament, and in the governments of major industrial cities? He remained an irritant in British politics for the rest of his life, and his successors restarted the violent fascist movements that continue until this day (with Antifa opposing them), but the point is that when it mattered the most, people didn't decide that they should just ignore those goons, or respect their "free speech."
Hitler openly admitted that the same thing could have happened to the Nazis in their early days. There's an ARA sticker/poster that shows a hand ripping weeds out of the ground; said weeds have swastikas at their tips. The caption reads "Yank 'em up before they take root!"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1