Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "The Hill" channel.

  1.  @chaosinfusion8127  Precisely!
    1
  2.  @CoolMyron  No. The cops shot at them. Teran may not have even fired at all, and there's evidence that they (Teran) were surrendering.
    1
  3.  @CoolMyron  A de facto sit-in is not a capital crime. Tortuguita was sitting cross-legged with hands raised when the cops opened fire.
    1
  4. That's not true. For one thing, people usually have to get caught first. For another, the more apt comparison was with the Stop Cop City activists, which the host and the Daily Signal reporter seem to have never heard of.
    1
  5. No, it's the orchestra kids who play violin.
    1
  6. Besides, nobody owes anyone else an explanation.
    1
  7.  @burnthrust They were blocking the entrance. It's clear.
    1
  8.  @burnthrust Also, embryos aren't "someone." That comes later. There's no harm in not being born.
    1
  9.  @burnthrust  Embryos aren't babies. There is no god.
    1
  10.  @Rodrifuuu  Thirty-three seconds in, for one.
    1
  11. Asking for asylum is legal, but felony APO is a serious crime. Meanwhile, these people were blocking the entrance. That violates the FACE Act. Do you realize what things were like pre-FACE?
    1
  12. Yes. Abortion is healthcare. Abortion is usually performed by ob/gyns, and you know what they do, right?
    1
  13.  @TrentSLucas Embryos aren't babies. That comes later.
    1
  14.  @DigitalCrusader3494  Embryos and babies are distinct. The argument is a philosophical one about personhood, the characteristics that make killing wrong.
    1
  15.  @Amanda-xx7sj  Besides, even if it was only an abortion provider and nothing else, that shouldn't make a difference.
    1
  16. The staff at those centers lie to women, among other things.
    1
  17.  @utah_koidragon7117  Look at what it was like pre-FACE. They're preventing people from accessing healthcare.
    1
  18. Why might it have happened?
    1
  19. Some of them were blocking access. You can see it.
    1
  20. Yes, and lots of people get in trouble for it. So what? Most protests take the streets, but are on the move.
    1
  21. Disingenuous.
    1
  22. I'm not sure, but that's beside the point. Being out past curfew is not a violation of the FACE Act. Do you know what it was like pre-Face?
    1
  23. They impeded access to the facility. This was a FACE Act violation. Do you know what it was like pre-FACE?
    1
  24. Look at the FACE Act. It's not simple trespassing. Also, look at what it was like pre-FACE.
    1
  25.  @cegrif01  If you're unvaccinated, good luck in your quest for the Herman Cain Award!
    1
  26. The apt comparison, which the host and the Daily Signal reporter seemed unable to grasp, was with the Stop Cop City protesters. Pre-FACE Act, not only could people not get to their medical appointments (abortion or otherwise), but cops had to arrive every weekend and haul people off.
    1
  27.  @deadgolfer6345  It's clearly in the video; they are blocking access.
    1
  28. Most abortions are performed by ob/gyns.
    1
  29.  @dustinavant2003  That seems to be the maximum sentence, but in any case, do you know what it was like pre-FACE Act?
    1
  30. Embryos aren't babies. The Daily Signal reporter, and the host, are so disingenuous. There are no arrests for being out on the sidewalk, they're in trouble for blocking the entrances. That violates the FACE Act.
    1
  31. They violated the FACE Act. Also, that insulting remark is unbecoming, and besides, not everyone wants to get married!
    1
  32. You don't know what it was like pre-FACE Act.
    1
  33. Non sequitur.
    1
  34. I would say that too, but not due to the government enforcing the FACE Act.
    1
  35. @edwardoretardo6855 Do you have an idea what it was like pre-FACE?
    1
  36.  @evanburrows1697  Not so. I'm opposing a pernicious lie.
    1
  37.  @evanburrows1697  Those sit-ins were progressive. Blocking access to clinics is regressive.
    1
  38.  @link10909  To the extent that that's even true, the FACE Act has never been applied that way, as far as I know. It was written in response to the weekly blockades of clinic entrances. (It was also written with concerns about terrorism.)
    1
  39. Leftists are pro-gun. We always have been. Liberals are known to be squeamish about guns, but the further left you look, the more guns you find.
    1
  40.  @nomdeguerre8464  Leftists are pro-gun.
    1
  41. ?
    1
  42. See what it was like pre-FACE.
    1
  43. This isn't mainstream?
    1
  44.  @unboxedcharacter  Most of the crime in Chicago is very concentrated, and no, NYC does not have skyrocketing crime. In fact, it dropped last year. I am pro-gun, but tell the truth.
    1
  45.  @Mike-gt1cs  I'm pro-gun, but the news sensationalizes crime stories. People nearly always think that crime rates are higher than they really are. Crime rates dropped in NYC last year. The most dangerous parts of CA are in Bakersfield and Fresno, not the "big Democrat cities" you hear about. There are numerous other examples.
    1
  46.  @unboxedcharacter Skyrocketing knife and car bombs? Again, I am pro-gun, but you don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  47.  @derpityderp-derp4007  "Shitties..." Grow up. The most dangerous parts of CA are Bakersfield and Fresno, much more conservative than L.A. and other parts of the state. Crime dropped in NYC last year. Several GOP-run cities are much more dangerous than the places you and others like to disparage. I am pro-gun, but please live in reality.
    1
  48.  @kirkchurchil8216  *you're
    1
  49.  @melgillham462  What demographics are these?
    1
  50.  @PrinceIsot  Republican-governed cities are often notably worse than the Democrat-governed cities you like to disparage.
    1