Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kenmacfarlane8744 No, it was a putsch, or an outright coup attempt, that came within a short distance and a short time of lynching lawmakers (among others), preventing certification of the election, and causing a constitutional crisis. The evidence is quite clear. There was plenty of comment about the civil unrest you mention. Most of the violence was the work of cops, vigilantes, and apolitical lumpen, along with some of the property destruction (although, in a world where property is valued more highly than people are, political vandalism is an acceptable tactic; see the Sons of Liberty).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randominc.2251 No weapons? Several were arrested with concealed guns, some of the Oath Keepers had rifles stashed in a nearby hotel room for a "Quick Reaction Force," we're finding out now that they were hoping for an armed second wave, one guy had lots of guns and explosives in his nearby truck, and of course the attackers had thousands of melee weapons, with which they inflicted some very serious injuries (lots of TBIs, loss of an eye, loss of digits, etc.). Quite a few of the attackers are charged with (or have pleaded guilty to) Assault With a Dangerous Weapon. As for being "let in," there are countless hours of video footage of the heavy fighting at various entrances, footage of the forced entrances to the building via broken windows, and so on. Most of the police fought bravely, but some collaborated with the attackers. If anything, I'm surprised that there weren't more collaborators.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1