Comments by "" (@yellowtunes2756) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

@phild3936 Funny how Nazis from Right Sector throwing Molotovs at police is just an "election with no coup", but when protesters in America walking in an empty capitol, then it's a coup attempt, it's ok to shoot them and everyone who did it should be charged with treason. Btw, could Yanukovich participate in those "elections"? Would be problematic when armed people trying to kill you huh. I believe there's a word for it: caup, soup, don't remember
1
@neilbadger4262 it was before 2014 coup and before Ukrainian government sent troops to blow up a quarter of their population for disagreeing with the new government they didn't vote for
1
@bloodgout Ukrainians who want to join EU or NATO can also move to EU or NATO countries, right? There's zero evidence that Russian troops were in the Donbas outside of a few hundred Wagner soldiers
1
@someone2549 everything was ok before nazis from right sector overthrew DEMOCRATICALLY elected government and helped billionaires to get in power
1
@ebrim5013 i mean, Russia indeed has fastest rockets in the world by far (nothing NATO has is even close to kinzjal, while Russia has far better things) and best air defence, also by far (even old soviet s300 has better range and speed than any NATO air defence)
1
Yeah, that's what you do when you lose the war - capitulate
1
@davidwittberg683 Putin never said anything about 3 days. You listened to western propaganda too much. And why should Russia give up, considering that they control 20% of Ukraine?
1
It's indeed an existential war for Ukraine because they already lost half of their population due to immigration. If they won't stop now - there will be no Ukrainian nation in a few generations. But letting go of a few rebel regions won't affect them at all
1
@playedout148 Russia also doesn't do that. But Ukraine is sacrificing thousands in cauldrons (Bahmut Krinky, Lysichansk, Severodonetsk, Mariupol and Avdeevka) and for PR stunts (Belgorod, Crimea) And pretty much everyone admitted that Ukraine has manpower shortages despite kidnapping people off streets to throw them into the military for the last 2 years
1
All wars end with negotiations and surrender of one side. Ukraine already lost half of its population since 2014. If Zelensky wants to save his country - he should let go of a few pro Russian regions
1
 @xyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyz he literally called Vance "suka"
1
Great leader who ordered his militia to snatch people off streets and beat them to force them to join the military? 40 people drowned in Tisa while trying to escape Zelensky's regime. He banned men from leaving Ukraine. And he's sacrificing hundreds of thousands in unwinnable war because of his ego. What kind of example is that?
1
@cv990a4 Soviet industry and infrastructure haven't disappeared, Russia still has it. Nothing stops Putin from saying "we captured so much territory that we are struggling with guarding it, so we will mobilize only 20k troops and won't send them to the frontline, don't worry guys, everything is according to plan", then mobilize 200k and send them on Ukranian head on. How do you know that anyone recruiting in prisons? Again, one person said it, Ukranian propaganda made a huge deal out of it. There's no way for anyone to confirm it
1
@Lasse65 no-one is recruiting prisoners in Russia, Ukranian propaganda exists too. And considering that Ukraine left many people from battalion Tornado out of prison (they commited many war crimes in Donbas, including murders of innocent, torture and rape) - I'm 99% it's self projection from Ukranian side You're talking about raw numbers. No-one can give Ukraine 6 million rifles. No-one will fight until every grown male is dead or crippled. Even nazi Germany lost 7 million with population of 80m before being done, despite having best industry and decade of war propaganda, it's 7% of population. And you acting like Ukraine without any industry left will give up only after loosing 15% of population. Btw, Ukranian officials stated that Ukraine is loosing 300 dead every day, so it's around 1000 casualties total. Even if we assume that Ukranians will loose as many as Germany in ww2 percentage wise (2.8m) - it will take 7 years with current death rate. Considering that Ukrainian officials stated that 3 months ago Ukraine lost 50% of their heavy equipment and all NATO supplies only covered 15% of their losses - Ukraine is loosing a lot more equipment than it's receiving. How many years will Ukranians fight with current losses of equipment (50% - 50%*15% is 43% per 3 months)? If every 3 months they will loose 43% of current equipment - in a year they will have 4% equipment left. Of course number will be higher, since Ukraine receives weapons and when you don't have many weapons left - you're a lot more careful. So let's assume that after a year 15% of needed equipment will be left. How exactly can you arm 2.8m man and except them to fight with sticks vs tanks?
1
@UAGoWSuplexer considering that Russia had 200 total, i guess one mighty Ivan is beating the shit out of entire Ukranian army. Thanks for you wise words. I'm also curious how exactly Ukrainian government counted 200k Russian casualties, since Ukranian are loosing territories every day and their only counter offensive stopped without starting
1
@FancyJones well, if you stick to western media you should know that before 2022 they were openly talking about nazi issue in Ukraine. For example you can find a great The Guardian video named "Ukrainian nazi training camp" or something like this. It's Azov training camp for kids. My favourite part is around 10min mark where leader of the camp says "yes, there are nazis in Azov, but they aren't training kids", while operator shows one of the trainers with swastika tattoo on his neck. There are also thousands of photos of Ukranian equipment with nazi crosses all over them. Only after 2022 western propaganda decided to portray Ukrainians as heroes Here's some Russian perspective for you. I hate Putin, protested him many times since 2017 and against this war too. I hate this war and wars in general. But the more i read western media the more I want Russia to win. Because i see how western media portray nazis as heroes, i see how "progressive world" calls my entire nation orcs, portrays this conflict as "good vs evil" and despite all their talk about helping Ukraine - they're barely doing anything. Why should i choose side of hypocrites that hate me? And about sanctions. I don't blame Putin for them, i blame west. They don't want to hurt Putin, they want to hurt Russian population. How exactly banning Russian sportsmen from Olympics or Eurovision will help to stop the war? How exactly not letting me buy games on steam will help Ukraine? Shouldn't west flood Russia with iphones and movies so Russians would take money away from Russian economy to buy another game on Steam? And all of my anti Putin friends (except for one) have the same opinion. I don't mind going to war anymore. And the only thing that upsets me about possible mobilization is that I probably won't see NATO soldiers fighting there because they're pussies
1
@stevesmart2545 it's an Azov battalion training camp for kids who will be brainwashed by Ukrainian propaganda. And kids are trained by people with swastikas on their necks. I never said its the main reason to invade, i said that Ukraine does have huge nazi problem, they glorified nazi collaborators, they named streets after them, they're officially heroes of Ukraine Ukraine dammed the river to Crimea that supplies 80% of freshwater to the region, deliberately starving 2 million people. Zelensky threatened to build nukes on Munich conference. Ukraine kept bombing Donbas civilians despite Minsk agreement. And also Angela Merkel, Hollande, Poroshenko and Zelensky all admitted that Minsk agreement was made to rearm Ukraine for future wars, instead of stopping the war in Donbas. More than enough reasons to invade them, don't you think? Actually no, don't answer it. But better tell me what should have Ukraine do to justify Russian invasion in your eyes?
1
@tuehojbjerg969 that's not how it works. Russia has 10 to 1 artillery advantage in Bahmut according to Ukraine, while 80% of casualties in any war are caused by artillery and other bombs. So no-one is "attacking into machine guns", Russia bombs those machine guns and then sending their troops. So yeah, Russian losses a lot smaller than ukrainian ones
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Vadym Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's military intelligence told to The Guardian that Russia has 15 to 1 artillery advantage on the battlefield. It was in the summer, but nothing has changed since then, NATO is sending too little equipment and too little ammo How do you know that Russians are doing human wave tactics and loosing 300 dead each day in Bahmut alone? Do you think that if that was the case - they would have made more rapid gains? Between "Russia is barely attacking and gaining little ground" and "Russia is storming machine guns head on" you have to choose one Btw, if you want to know what's happening on the other side - you need to listen how they whine about something. For example pro Russian telegram channel Повернутые на Z Войне recently posted video from UKRAINIAN tv channel where ukrainian soldier was saying that Russian are attacking with small groups at night, shelling ukrainians with artillery while Ukraine doesn't have an answer for it.
1
@tuehojbjerg969 according to Washington post and their interview with Ukrainian soldiers from Kherson offensive - during those attacks Ukraine lost at least 5 times more soldiers than Russia. Do you think that Washington post or Ukrainian soldiers are nazis and spreading propaganda? Not all ukrainian soldiers are nazis, don't offend them lol 80% of casualties in any war are caused by artillery and bombs. Russia has more artillery, tanks, planes, helicopters and rockets. USA since 2021 sent to Ukraine 940k dumb 155mm shells and only 4200 GPS guided shells. So only 0.4% of Ukrainian shells are hitting target with precision, everything else is also takes "hundreds of shells to hit a target". Do tou think that Russia used less guided shells than 4200? Do you think Russia has less precision ammunition than they used long range rockets? Why? Also Russian artillery is equal or superior to everything that NATO received from Ukraine. For example himars is just like smerch or Tornado s, tho Russian versions have more rockets. Pzh2000 just like koalitsya sv but Russian version has less crew members. "Attackers always have higher casualties" - no. Name one middle eastern country USA invaded in last 30 years where they would have had higher casualties than defenders. Can you name a single country that lost less soldiers than Germany in ww2 when Germany was attacking? It's about fire power, not about "defender attacker". Especially in modern war. Even in Verden battle in ww1 attacking German force lost less soldiers than defending France You know nothing about this war or wars in general
1
@tuehojbjerg969 accuracy isn't about artillery, but about shells. Only 0.4% of ukrainian shells are precise. What artillery are you referring to? All artillery serves different purpose. For example solncepek hits huge area and burnes everyone even inside trenches. Smerch can also hit a huge area or can be as precise as himars (5m radius). It all depends on shell that is used for every particular situation Again, do you think that Russia used less than 4200 precise rounds? And why do you think that way? Russia mobilizing troops because before mobilization every soldier could have cancelled their contracts and leave the frontline with paycheck. Also because Ukraine had like 7 mobilization waves and greatly outnumbered Russian troops on the battlefield. Even if not a single Russian soldier was dead - they still would have needed a mobilization If Russia has more tanks than Ukraine - obviously Russia will loose more tanks. For example in Vietnam USA lost 10000 aircrafts against 300 aircrafts of North Vietnam, does it mean that Vietnam had better planes and helicopters? Also there's no such thing as ukrainian tank, they are all Soviet Russia has by far better rockets (nothing is even close to speed of Russian kinzjal while Russia also has Sarmat which is 5 times faster than kinzjal), air defence and extremely good artillery. Can you name artillery piece that doesn't have superior or equal Russian analogue? Well, except for m777 because stationary artillery is shite and Russia uses koalitsya sv to do the same thing, but without getting destroyed
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Russia doesn't have massive technological advantage but has massive artillery advantage I have no clue what you meant in your first sentence about Germany in ww1 because it was barely English. But if it was possible for Germany to have less losses than France in ww1 while doing human wave tactics against trenches and literally run towards machine guns - surely Russia can have less losses than Ukraine because of 10 to 1 artillery advantage
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Vadym Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's military intelligence said that Russia has 15 to 1 artillery advantage on the battlefield in interview to The Guardian. Just because you don't know something - doesn't mean that it's Russian propaganda. Where can i find video where ukrainian soldier says that Russia doesn't have huge artillery advantage? I would love to see it myself Again, difference between 10 and 100 meters is in shells, not in artillery. Do you think Russia used less than 4200 precise round? Yes or no? Because every other artillery needs to shoot in general direction of target and then correct it's fire with drone. Even dumbest artillery shells with huge spread like grad can hit very close to target after some correction.
1
@tuehojbjerg969 again, before mobilization soldiers could have leave army at any time after canceling their contract, while Ukraine had like 7 mobilization waves. Even if Russia haven't lost a single soldier - they would have needed mobilization anyway. By your logic, since Ukraine had tons of mobilization waves - they are loosing a lot more soldiers than Russia that did only 1 mobilization wave Do you know how artillery works? If shell isn't gps or lazer guided - it can't hit certain point on the map, it needs correction with drones. Without correction or guided missiles - any artillery is inaccurate. Are you slow? According to Ukranian deputy of minister of defence in summer - Ukraine lost 50% of their heavy equipment while all NATO supplies only covered 15% of their losses. And it was when NATO actually sent Ukraine heavy equipment in decent quantities
1
All victories end with peace deals if it's not total annihilation. The sooner the better What agreement did Russia break? Budapest memorandum, which states that Ukraine should remain sovereign and independent, despite Ukraine becoming NATO puppet in 2014? Minsk agreements, despite Ukraine keeping bombing civilians for almost a decade? What are you referring to? Btw, do you think Russia also shouldn't negotiate with Ukraine, considering that Ukraine sent Azov leaders back to fighting (despite agreeing not to? Or considering grain deal?
1
@sergarlantyrell7847 "Ukraine is never going to accept it" - so you believe that Zelensky will keep throwing Ukrainians under Russian fabs in unwinnable war ? If Ukraine ain't a NATO puppet, then why could Boris Johnson order to stop negotiating and to "just fight" ? How could Blinken and Biden say "Ukraine has everything they need for an offensive" and force them to attack, despite Zaluzhny and Zelensky saying that they don't have enough equipment? Why can't Ukraine use NATO weapons as they please? That's what being a puppet feels like In 2014 both Russia and EU told Ukraine that they can't have trade agreements with both the EU and Russia at the same time, but Ukraine already had a trade agreement with Russia. Russia was by far the biggest trading partner of Ukraine with China being second. Of course no sane person would cancel it and ruin Ukrainian economy. That's why billionaires and their puppet Nazis from Right Sector with the help of US overthrew DEMOCRATICALLY elected government despite the will of eastern Ukrainians who elected it. How's life in Ukraine now?
1
@cormchm2853 so it's also wrong to create Israel in the first place against the will of local Palestinians? Is it also wrong to support Taiwan against the will of 2 billion Chinese? Is it wrong to invade any country ever? Do you also watch channels talking about Syrian war where you call Americans and Turks, who invaded this country, burgers and kebabs, while messaging your representatives to ban those nationalities from participating in Olympics Every war is more complicated than "good Vs evil". I'd also argue that it's wrong for Ukraine to bomb civilians of Donbas into submission for 10 years already. And I'd say it's very wrong to dam the river to Crimea to deliberately starve 2 million people. I believe such actions deserve punishment
1
@sergarlantyrell7847 "Ukraine is never going to accept it" - so you believe that Zelensky will keep throwing Ukrainians under Russian fabs in unwinnable war ? If Ukraine ain't a NATO puppet, then why could Boris Johnson order to stop negotiating and to "just fight" ? How could Blinken and Biden say "Ukraine has everything they need for an offensive" and force them to attack, despite Zaluzhny and Zelensky saying that they don't have enough equipment? Why can't Ukraine use NATO weapons as they please? That's what being a puppet feels like. Why are you denying the obvious?
1
@hedgehog3180 Ukraine leaving USSR has nothing to do with eastern Ukraine joining Russia. And it doesn't matter if some referendum is recognised or not. Taiwan is also recognised as part of China, but would you support China bombing Taiwan into submission? The same way Ukraine bombed Donbas for over a decade
1
You don't know what fascism is and it's weird to hear from supporter of Ukraine
1
@sammiller6631 feel free to fact check me. Type " Enter country name ran out of weapons for Ukraine" and you will see plenty of news articles quoting officials from those countries My favourite one is Biden on camera saying that the USA has completely run out of artillery shells for Ukraine. So now Ukraine only receives ammo from pathetic existing production
1
Ukrainians said no to war when they stopped volunteering to the front 2 years ago. Zelensky said no to peace when he started snatching Ukrainians off streets to throw them into the military by force And if Zelensky refuses to make peace, then Ukraine will keep losing until they run out of Ukrainians to throw at Russian troops
1