Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "Asmongold Clips" channel.

  1.  @Helldog6  "They" who lol? You are just spitting generic bs. The situation <is clearly> specific here.
    65
  2.  @bluegamer4210  ["it's okay to be white" is a bit of a weird thing to say considering White people have historicly been the oppresors] Bro, this does not make <any sense at all>. Almost ALL races were oppressors in the history at some point, you don't remember how Gengis Khan caused the death of fricking 40 million of people? Or how slavery in the west started literally by europeans buying slaves from the africans itself (because of conflicts between groups)? The point of the question is very simple, to check if the model has bias, and it clearly has, the question "it's okay to be white?" is not bad on itself, it is not more weird than also asking "it's okay to be black?" because at the end of the day nobody should ask if it is "okay" to have some immutable characteristic that has nothing to do with who you are.
    42
  3. Which is a problem.
    16
  4.  @talimancern7724  This is called an <anomaly>, it is not the normality but rather an accident.
    10
  5. @drantigon Not necessarily, it can be technically reverted. It can also get back faster if you get fat again if I remember correctly, but definitively possible to cure in some cases.
    10
  6.  @Synical02  > You can be threatened and sexually harassed in a irl job idk what your point is. Now you are just being ignorant by comparing this with having an entire audience composed of literal thousands and millions of random people.
    10
  7.  @allex975gaming  > he said his friends make thousands of dollars as a comparison to normal jobs Okay but actually what was the problem?
    5
  8. It was not an extremely bad take anyways, people are mostly overreacting <as always>.
    5
  9. Being employed by someone else also has this, you can just get another job or pursue an enhancement in your carrier. All in this world comes with a cost nonetheless.
    4
  10. ​ @cagxplays9602  1. In this specific case, the question is literally about politics, she is clearly a communist. 2. What the frick are you saying? I live in brazil and this bs is exactly like this here every single time, there's nothing inherently wrong with americans in this regard that is not also present in other countries.
    3
  11. Oh, and know what's better? 3. Literally the notion that everything is political is commonly proclamed by socialists.
    3
  12.  @TheEntity_DBD  This can also be seen as an abusive behavior, and probably there is some law against this as well. I don't agree with those laws, but I would absolutely kick the people that were saying to me to kick this guy from my restaurant, money is not above everything for everybody.
    3
  13. Call out what bro? You don't discuss with crazy people, the other game devs are doing the right thing on not trying to convince them, otherwise who knows what they would do, they are like crazy afraid dogs.
    3
  14.  @ironmaiden93ofangmar  Plot twist: You are not in position to judge his actions
    3
  15.  @OutsiderLabs  USA.
    2
  16.  @Psych1_-  This is not strictly true, if he was not 'capable of making rational decisions' then he would not had wanted to get out in the first place and would simply agree with staying in the experiment. This was not what happened. Also, there's a range in which you are still pretty rational unless you had not slept for closer to the human sleep deprivation limit. He just wanted money and that's it, if it was the case.
    2
  17. yeah
    2
  18. > "Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom from consequences" It kinda literally is. There is no point on saying this catchphrase when you live in a positivist state that can turn <anything> into a crime. By your definition north korea also has plenty of freedom of speech.
    2
  19. ​ @infamous6283  that was a good one, nipah~☆!
    2
  20. bad idea.
    2
  21. ​ @zeri3889  That's why these are anomalies, they should not be treated as a problematic to the normal cases just like you don't say people don't see the reality because some have schizophrenia.
    2
  22. Steps 1 and 2 are basically the equivalent.
    2
  23. ​ @user-df4kf6fg7h  It does not stop crime because nothing would, since man is man there are crimes, it will not change with a law. You have the punishments to make justice, not to "stop further crimes" (wich is a consequence of the law to some degree, either way).
    2
  24. A lot of diseased africans would gladly trade their life for the people that can worry their tomorrow, so what is your point again? It is just a measurement thing.
    1
  25.  @Fam98K  far from truth
    1
  26.  @Garoslol  Well, people are generally dumb so I don't know what he expected, you should always expect the worse interpretation possible from internet
    1
  27.  @Rasta796  and this means...?
    1
  28.  @frank2453  > The difference is that in those jobs, you don't decide how long or hard you work. You don't get to choose your coworkers. You literally choose. You just don't cherrypick them, but you can totally choose the people you will work with and the type of job you will do because <there are many>. The question is that you want absolute choice over everything and this is something you will only have if you have a differential with the other people. And that same differential is what enables people like Asmongold to be able to "decide how long or hard they work" (not really, but I'll get along). You are just removing things from him that makes he able to be where he is and then saying "oh look at his privileges, most people can't do it this exactly way and that's why he's being unfair", in reality most people have nothing to show.
    1
  29.  @frank2453  I'm brazillian, but my takes are not based on the "america job market", they are about job market in general. In my country things are even worse, the 1% of the population here earns what is equivalent to the ~50%+ of america. And my points are not entangled with your same job, they are general in the sense that you are not forced to stay in your job, objectivelly speaking, so you "choose" your coworkers in the sense that you can literally find another job (if you are not picky, you can get one very fast). The final point about the thing that will give you more power being your differentials still holds as well, I did not said streaming <is the same> but you cannot remove the attributes of someone and just say "he's objectively better so he cannot say nothing" because he have what he have not because of just his job as streamer but also because of these differentials that most people lack to begin with.
    1
  30. I don't know since the world became such as something being illegal = something not happening. The state is not a force of nature and people break laws literally ALL the time.
    1
  31. ​ @giampaolomannucci8281  Yes, it does. Because the other way around is an inversion of the natural rights of each one.
    1
  32.  @zeri3889  anomalies.
    1
  33.  @simohayha4152  Lol, "real world" work can also be <anything> that is physically possible can can get you people paying. The unique difference is that streamers won their money by entertaining people while other people won their money by doing things that serve some purpose that will pay the investments on the business and prevent it from bankrupcy.
    1
  34.  @simohayha4152  Yes. I mean this as well, because people are watching <Asmongold> watching other people's content, not the other people's content directly, they are doing so because they find it amusing and they find it objetively better than watching the content directly (and even I recognize this, I also watch people that watches other peoples things because it is funny). In the end of the day they are providing entertainment for these people <that's literally why people watch them>.
    1
  35.  @simohayha4152  Lol, my comment was removed. But yeah, I mean it. People like to watch things Asmon is watching, this provides amusement to them, and that's why they are watching it with Asmon and not directly.
    1
  36.  @F34RDSoldier805  You cannot fully ignore people in streaming job as well, you are just being overly naive here. Because if you do so for a significant time you will lose on viewers and popularity, and depending on what you do you will also loose on <much> money because sponsoring also requires social interactions of this kind.
    1
  37. Yeah, this is the bad end coming, "The world is now brazil", these people are just complaining instead of actually doing something to solve the problems they see.
    1
  38.  @zeri3889  disfunctional reproductive organs*
    1
  39.  @Zakjuh  The easiest thing on this world is to dismiss someone takes and say they are saying things because they don't experienced it. But you just don't know.
    1
  40. ​ @araamahasla555  Or I will not go bankrupt and I will continue serving my customers and the world will keep spinning around. I already act like this, I am not bankrupt, things are going well. The end.
    1
  41. ​ @araamahasla555  I own my company, even if it is not a restaurant I make decisions based on my morals very often. I am also not "playing" against anyone, markets are not zero-sum games where everyone is trying to destroy eachother at every single step, mutual benefit is possible/happens and you can continue living without being the richest person in the world. You have a very sad and inactive way of seing things, I must say.
    1
  42. ​ @pretzels1208  People have a hard time distinguishing between something not being illegal and something being good, this is a disease caused by the modern state. There is not a single morality in doing something because you can be arrested or sued if you don't do that thing.
    1
  43. he is on a real job right now
    1
  44. > i think it's a fantastic idea to listen to someone's opinion about real life topics and politics who spends his whole life in his parents' attic I don't think it is a good idea to listen to <anyone> position about real life topics and <politics>, because people don't know shit about their own lives, and they surely don't know shit about greater topics or other peoples lives.
    1
  45. This is a bad idea, when a loud minority is unionized they tend to spread their crazyness much more effectively to other people. This is how the whole sjw thing got to this point by now.
    1
  46.  @giuseppebonatici7169  You are just seing the bright potential side of it, I'm seeing it with the lens of "a loud minority unite is worse than a majority dispersed". What exactly do you think that happens when a minority of progressives join together and start scheming? I think you might fastly find that this is probably the cause of why the gaming industry (and others as well) is being contamined with this all over the place
    1
  47.  @bubbajoe117  I don't know much about the gamergate, but for a first google on it the posts about it looks very tendencious, but I'll study the case. Nonetheless, what was your point?
    1
  48. What happened :?
    1
  49. Always a socialist.
    1
  50. Normal people often forget it as well when they think their lives are bad and how that streamer guy had god complex, but forgetting of how blessed we are compared to people over a century ago (and compared to basically all people in extremely poor countries).
    1