Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Motherboard"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AbdulAhad-wy3hi 1. Because it costs hundreds of billions of dollars and nobody wants to pay for it. Every time we get started, the politicians meddle again and screw everything up.
Note that the space shuttle and ISS were supposed to be working on reusable ships (Apollo could only be used once), finding ways to make space travel affordable, long-term medical experiments, and such. This may be boring, but it's the stuff you NEED for any long-term programs.
Also, why send a person when a robot is safer, costs a fraction of the amount, and can stay active for YEARS at a time because it doesn't need food, air, or water?
2. According to Congress, they sent the second document back to him without having even looked at it because they had no reason to believe that it wasn't the same irrelevant unusable garbage Baron presented in his first part. Have you tried searching the Dead Letter Office, where undelivered mail ends up?
By the way, Baron presented no evidence of any fakery or any sabotage at all. All he talked about was supposed negligence and safety violations on the part of the contractor, most of which had little to do with Apollo 1 and he couldn't remember any of it. He actually was so desperate to seem like he had a reason to be there that he LIED about a conversation with one of the other witnesses where they discussed details that contradicted the hard evidence and on-site recordings they had been presented.
If he actually had anything, wouldn't he have put his most importance evidence in the part they actually looked at that i believe didn't go missing, not buried it in the 500 pages of nitpicks?
3. Because that's how the hoaxers told you they looked. They never talk about fatigue, the fact that Armstrong is known to hate interviews, or Aldrin's personal drama going on behind the scenes or the fact that he may still be angry at NASA for cheating him out of being the first man instead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AbdulAhad-wy3hi ..... you mean the thing that Rumsfield himself straight-up says in his "admission of the missing money"?
"The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible."
Jesus fucking Christ, you cannot just print money out of thin air. Doing so devalues your currency and destroys your economy. If you start doing it on one thing, you do it on others and that is how Hitler rose to power: because Germany did it to pay off repairs from WWI.
By the US's military spendi8ng is a bloated cancerous mass that outspends everything else and the politicians in charge keep cutting funding from education, transportation, health and safety, and everything else to fund it. There are plenty of people in power that would like to throw NASA into the fire to fuel it too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1