Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Motherboard" channel.

  1. Yeah, I'm sure Armstrong is uncomfortable because he's lying and not because he's a shy, private person that had a reputation for hating interviews BEFORE he joined NASA. It's clearly proof of a hoax when his personality completely and totally stays exactly the same.
    1
  2. Excellent. Now watch the hoax videos. Maybe you'll be able to answer why none of you can spot when the hoax video makers are lying on-screen even after they've been caught doing so. Maybe they're just better liars...
    1
  3. Conspiracy theorists are rubbish at analyzing body language. It really comes across more as wishful thinking. They never notice their own side lying, ever, under any circumstances. I mean the Australian Coke Bottle lady straight-up forgets to check the time zone to make sure it is possible for the country she claims to have lived in when inventing her story, so you'd think that the "dilligent" hoaxers would notice her telegraphing like she's directing traffic but nope, let's just believe her at face value because duuuuuuuuuur.
    1
  4. So.... why didn't they do anything when Aldrin 'confessed on camera' not once, but twice? Guess they don't actually care huh?
    1
  5. ​@ Well, it's pretty hard to deny without proving you have zero interest in the truth when you can play his video and NASA's side-by-side and show him cutting out parts of it that disproved him 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  6. You should be more disappointed with yourself for believing the hoax claptrap since you got scammed by a bunch of two-bit con artists that have been repeatedly caught red-handed flat-out lying about their "evidence".
    1
  7.  @Nastyfinger1444  Okay..... Bart Sibrel rearranged, dubbed over, and edited out portions of his "faking the distance" video to hide that the original directly contradicts his story and contains shots that are impossible to perform with the trick he claims was used and GOT CAUGHT almost immediately because he was too stupid to realize people would find the footage he used and compare versions. He neglects to mention when showing how "angry" the astronauts are to be "confronted with the truth" that his video was filmed AFTER harassing them to the point that the police had to get involved. His "six feet of lead to cross the Van Allen Belts" is MADE UP and pulled straight out of his ass; the belts are the wrong type of radiation for lead shielding, and yet were supposed to take your side's claims about how the "deadly radiation would have killed them" seriously even though you've already lied once on the subject so you've proven that your analysis cannot be trusted. And much much more. David Percy, the owner of Aulis, put out a 4 hour "documentary," but is such a compulsive liar that he couldn't go ten minutes without flubbing his evidence on his very first claim (where he claims that a flap is "missing" on the video footage and claims that proves the video and still photographs were taken separately- then cherry picks individual frames to hide that the flap was clearly visible less than a second before until being obscured by camera angle.) He also cropped his "non-parallel shadows" picture to hide the the rocks in the lower right have shadows that change direction to match the object in the background he's comparing to, deliberately showed poor-quality reproductions to people to "analyze", rigged his playback speeds when showing how it's "slow motion" by showing a different speed than he claimed (which was accidentally proven by fellow hoaxer Jarrah White in a hilarious own goal) and more. David Percy's coauthor, Mary Bennett, is a professional bullshit artist and makes her living scamming people into thinking she has psychic powers. .Aulis, Percy's website, invents fictional "scientists" or uses "experts" talking about fields as far removed from their field as biology is from 18th century French literature to make their work seem more credible than they actually are. Their articles have also been analyzed and debunked many times, such as the stereoparallax article, which uses a lofty PhD.c that "founded a school and a university" that nobody can find in order give authenticity to a well-worded piece of tripe that uses formulas that are incompatible with the Apollo lenses and therefore completely pointless to read further because all subsequent math is automatically wrong. Una Ronald, the Australian coke bottle lady Percy "interviewed", couldn't be more obviously lying if her name was Pinnochio. She claims that she "stayed up late to watch the live broadcast and the coke bottle was gone when it was repeated in the morning". Might want to fact check your story there dearie considering that the landings happened at 11 AM in Western Australia and would have been repeated on the EVENING news, not the morning edition. Unless you work the graveyard shift or are a college student pulling an all-nighter, you have no business claiming you "stayed up late" to watch them. Unless of course you actually live in America or perhaps Britain, where Percy lives. Shall I keep going? No offense, but an "overwhelming amount of evidence" doesn't amount to jack shit if the people presenting it can and have been proven to be liars or incompetant. Of course you already knew all of this, since you did RESEARCH into the hoax claims and the people making them instead of blindly believing them at face value.
    1
  8. I'm going to give you a tip. Next time you get called for jury duty, tell the judge you can't perform it properly because "Durrrrr, they look guilty to me" is how innocent people get executed. By the way, if they were on trial, you people wouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting a conviction. First thing NASA does is trot Bart Sibrel and David Percy onto the stand, gleefully show the jury how they got caught lying about their evidence, and slap them with perjury.
    1
  9. The Flat Earthers did tell you that their model requires pretending that half the planet doesn't exist, right?
    1
  10. Okay, and the hoaxer leaders have been caught lying through their teeth over and over to the point of editing footage to remove contradictory details and yet not a single one of you ever points out how nervous they are. Guess that means they have no guilt whatsoever in deceiving millions.
    1
  11.  Sinjin Smyth  A conspiracy theorist finds telling one very easy.
    1
  12.  Sinjin Smyth  Tell me, did your leaders tell you that: - Bart SIbrel got caught with his hand in the cookie jar editing his "smoking gun" to remove portions of the original that disproved him, MADE UP his "six feet of lead to cross the Van Allen Belts" out of thin air, and neglected to mention when showing how "angry the astronauts are to be confronted" that he filmed that video AFTER earning himself a police record for stalking, harassment, and trespassing? - David Percy cherry picked frames to hide that his "missing" details were present mere seconds before, cropped photographs to hide that his "non-parallel shadows" changed direction, deliberately showed people poor-quality fifth or sixth generation replicas to "analyze", and rigged his "slow motion" playback speeds? That last one was accidentally confirmed by Jarrah White, who filmed himself doing the same thing in front of the camera. Way to score an own goal. - Mary Bennett, David Percy's coauthor, claims on Aulis's very own About the Authors page to have found her hoax information using PSYCHIC POWERS? - Aulis uses fictional scientists, or ones that are talking about subjects that they have no experience in, to make their articles seem more credible than they actually are? - "Professional photographer" Marcus Allen is a paid employee for some Australian dimestore equivalent to the National Enquirer? - Una Ronald, the Australian Coke Bottle Lady, flat-out lied in her story by claiming that she "stayed up late to watch the live broadcast and it was gone in the morning" even though the landings happened at NOON in Australia and would have been repeated on the EVENING news? - Jack White tried to pass off his own edits as anomalies in his "photographic analysis"? - Dr Groves rigged his radiation and heat tests by exposing them to conditions that do NOT match what they would have been exposed to to the point of ignoring the fact that there is no air in space? - Jarrah White censors his critics to the point that he fraudulently flagged their videos with bogus copyright strikes to try and get their accounts banned? False DMCA claims to harass people are PERJURY by the way. Yeah, yeah, you have an "open mind". That's why you didn't question a word these con artists said and immediately believed them because "A video on the internet says so, therefore it MUST be true!"
    1
  13.  Sinjin Smyth  Bart Sibrel called Aldrin hundreds of miles out of his way by pretending to be from a Japanese children's show, and then when Aldrin went "Not you again fuck off", he created a big stink and then tried to PHYSICALLY bar him from leaving the hotel until the staff kicked him out. He then chased Aldrin through the streets hurling insults and poking him with the bible (which is battery) despite repeated requests and attempts to be left alone peacefully until chasing him back onto the premises of the hotel and cornering him in the entryway. This is the point where Sibrel should be picked up by the black and whites because he is now trespassing against a private business. This was AFTER he got himself arrested for stalking Armstrong because he decided that being declined an interview gave him the right to follow people home and go sneaking around outside their houses. You, sir, do NOT have the moral high ground here. While physical violence is probably not the right answer, that does not change the FACT that it happened in response to Bart Sibrel committing ILLEGAL activities against the astronauts. But what do you care? Conspiracy theorists don't give two shits if their own side's actions are rude or outright criminal as long as it gets the response they want.
    1
  14. I have a question for you. Why do the hoaxers, when showing the "shut up elbow", never show the front camera angle where you can clearly see that no such elbowing actually occurred and why does the maker of that video delete comments that call him out on that and other claims he makes?
    1
  15. Now if only we knew for a fact that he didn't actually nudge Collins because there are two camera angles, you might be onto something. Tell me, why do you think that the hoaxer never, ever, ever showed the front camera for that? It's because it shows them sitting too far away to nudge and because Armstrong moves his elbow backwards towards himself in it.
    1
  16. So where is this video and how do you know that he's actually an FBI agent? Come on man, we both know that the hoaxers would just as soon have an actor pretend to be convinced.
    1
  17. And there are a million verses in the Hindu texts that prove that the Bible isn't real.
    1
  18.  @shaneobi5181  Do you realize that humans can be fine with one thing and yet uncomfortable with another even if that second seems much easier or much less dangerous? You must be an alien, because you've clearly never met a human. Do you realize that before being astronauts, most of the astronauts were professional test pilots, people that went to work in the morning to test untested high-speed vehicles in full knowledge that they might not be coming home. How much nerve would THAT require? And yet Armstrong STILL had a reputation for being a shy, withdrawn person that hated interviews even then, so you're talking out of your ass.
    1
  19.  @tommygun6559  I would really help if you were serving coffee and not human diarrhea in a cup. You lie about your evidence over, and over, and over and over, so why the flying fuck should anybody believe you?
    1
  20.  @jkalamajo  No, he's telling them "Pilots aren't speech-givers now fuck off".
    1
  21.  @marcusgomez3307  ....... you're not very smart, are you? Let me hold your hand and walk you through this. Your side constantly whines about how uncomfortable they are because "if they had really gone, they'd be jumping out of their seats to talk about it" blah blah blah blah blah. They couldn't possibly be nervous because..... you know..... pubic speaking is one of the most common human fears or anything else mundane like that. So I pointed out one of the other great first of aviation being reluctant to publicly speak and not jumping out of his chair to gush about his achievements ei8ther. The implication is of course that either the Wright Brothers are lying or that you're full of more shit than an outhouse. ------- It's kind of funny, you know. For all of the time "analyzing their body language" the armchair psychologists do here, not once have they ever mentioned even a single flaw in the performance of their own leaders, despite the fact that they've been caught telling lies so blatant that they should be telegraphing them like they're directing traffic.
    1
  22.  @MrEmmenbronx  It could happen, but there's zero evidence whatsoever that it did.
    1
  23.  @bigtodd6609  And your masters proved it wasn't when they had to resort to lying about and fabricating "evidence".
    1
  24.  @nigelwilliams9307  So what you're saying is that if somebody is afraid and reluctant to talk about the greatest achievement in the history of mankind, but they had witnesses, it's okay, but if they don't have witnesses, the same sort of behavior is "proof o guilt". Lovely double standard there. Wilbur Wright's flight must have been faked. All of those witnesses must have been lying, otherwise he'd have been standing on the table shouting it at the top of his lungs. Isn't that right?
    1
  25.  @nigelwilliams9307  That's not exactly true. There are a couple comments in this thread claiming he wouldn't talk for being a fraud too, though most though most of them are claiming the wright brotherd lied because they knew Whitehead and/or that Indian fraud were first instead
    1
  26.  @nigelwilliams9307  So how much disrespect for your fellow "truth" seekers who thought the best way to convince people was to out-fraud NASA? You'd be a lot more convincing if your movement hadn't spent decades repeatedly deceiving people and manipulating evidence.
    1
  27. @UCoRR2r11uMd6a1K3kbawWfQ Rucky.... I'm well aware of those "secret documents". Read that last paragraph you posted. Do you see that part where it reads "Rigid aircraft of constant mass" That's OUTRIGHT FALSE. Not only are planes not completely rigid, they also CONSTANTLY LOSE mass as they expend fuel. Congratulations. Your "secret admissions" is in the SAME SENTENCE as a claim that 100% unquestioningly unarguably WRONG. Really, this is just NASA simplifying variables. But that's not evil enough to stroke your conspiracy boner. News flash buddy: Flat Earth is a scam for people so drunk on their anti-authorty koolaid that they'll believe anything you tell them. You me to "see that NASA has been lying to me?" Tell your own leaders to stop lying first and promote REAL evidence instead of bullshit scams like that part in Level where you tried to show that "you can't see the light from the darkness" - with the plastic of the flashlight between the camera and the bulb.
    1
  28.  @321scully  Ahahahahahahaha, Christians don't tell lies. Thanks, i have soda up my nose.
    1
  29.  @lorichet  They were asked TWO questions. The second is whether they could see the stars through the solar corona despite the glare. This is a set of photographs taken from the command module, NOT the surface.
    1
  30.  @lorichet  "Could you actually the stars in the solar corona in spite of the glare" You cannot see the solar corona form the surface of the moon. It is INVISIBLE to the naked eye during daytime. It can only be seen when an object is blocking the sun's body. That's why the pictures of this were taken from the Command Module, in Collin's presence, as it came around from the dark side of the moon: so the moon itself would block the sun. If a person bungled and asked a stupid question, explain to me how that is NASA's fault.
    1
  31.  @lorichet  Siiiiigh. Armstrong answered that as two separate questions. He said that they could not see the stars from the daytime side of the moon without their equipment. And then, because he was asked about the solar corona, he answers about the pictures they took of the solar corona from the command module.
    1
  32.  @lorichet  And yet those are the very words that came out of his goddamned mouth. Your "context" is that NASA is lying because they answered the literal question they were asked. You have no business accusing anybody else of spinning while you yourself are spinning like a tilt-a-whirl.
    1
  33.  @hollystiener16  Rocks... dirt.. more rocks. There's no aliens on the moon.
    1
  34.  @kevinm3751  They don't look much different in the pre-flight conference.
    1
  35.  @S1L3nCe  Really? Because your scam artist "truthers" wallow in it like a pig in filth.
    1
  36.  @hitachi9778  So, have you ever watched the Gemini 8 press conference. It's very interesting that he still speaks in a low voice with a tone like he's "at a funeral" with lots of stammering and pauses and uhs, still avoids looking at the audience for much of it, and still nervously fidgets and adjusts in his chair. Your claims that the "nervousness and depression proves they're lying" would be much more convincing if he didn't act the exact bloody same three years before on a different mission even before Apollo 1. The idea that they changed after Apollo 11 is bullshit on soggy toast.
    1
  37.  @looneytoons2878  And yet Armstrong acts exactly like he did in the Gemini 8 press conference three years before. Hmmm.... For some strange reason, none of you every even talk about that one or any of their other conferences for that matter. Why is that?
    1
  38.  @looneytoons2878  Armstrong already acted like that in previous press conferences even before he was scheduled to be the "first man on the moon". Even before joining NASA, he had a reputation for hating interviews. Aldrin has a failing marriage, his mother committed suicide from depression about a year before the mission, and we know for a fact that he had a big fight with NASA over the fact that under previous protocols, he should have been the first man, not Armstrong, and he felt they made excuses and cheated him out of it. Collins mostly looks bored. Note that your "truth" movement will never be honest and tell you these details.
    1
  39.  @claudiosantoro509  Shame that Best Nonfiction Documentary never wins the Bests Picture.
    1
  40.  @claudiosantoro509  That would require it to be fiction, and if it were, your "truth" movement wouldn't need to lie like you were running for congress now, would it?
    1
  41.  @s.f.morris7331  Why did you delete your comments, coward? Too afraid to talk to me directly? Come on, we've heard these bogus "confessions" a billion times. Let me guess, the "confession to the girl?" The one where you frauds cut off the rest of his comment so dumb sheep like you wouldn't hear him continue talking about going BACK and blaming it on needing more money to do new stuff instead of simply repeat old missions? By the way, you do realize that we know for a fact that the "shut up elbow" is 100% bullshit because there's two versions of this interview shot from different angles right? Hmm, if you watch the front view, Armstrong's sitting too far away from Collins to elbow him and instead pulls his arm back towards himself as he adjusts in his chair. For a "truth" movement, you people do an awful lot of lying....
    1
  42.  @s.f.morris7331  By the way, you do realize that the "UFO sightings on the moon" stories are pure fiction and never actually happened right? People on the internet make them up because they know that people like you will believe them without question. No astronauts have ever said they were being watched from the edge. Never. Also, the Apollo 11 landing spot is a flat plain like Kansas, not in the middle of a crater. There isn't a large crater there for them to be watched from the edge of unless the aliens are the size of Tinkerbell. Now, if the moon is infested with fae, that's a reason not to go.
    1
  43.  @s.f.morris7331  There is not. The "watching over the rim" is MADE UP. It doesn't exist, and if the astronauts had ever actually said that, every single hoaxer would have linked to the video a billion times like they do with the supposed "confessions". The Aldrin "UFO" video was speculation about a light they saw. The UFO crowd deliberately cut the interview to not show him saying it was probably part of the ship outside. The claim that he "took a lie detector about seeing an alien" or whatever it is the conspiracy theorists claim is an outright blatant lie. There is only one truth.
    1
  44.  @apolloana  In front of a large audience, on the spot, being judged, recorded, and broadcast to the entire world... It's awfully interesting how none of the hoaxers ever talk about the fact that Armstrong acts like this in his other Gemini era interviews.... why do you think they hide that, Ana?
    1
  45.  @apolloana  You've never watched the Gemini 8 press conference, have you?
    1
  46.  @clath2823  Buzz had a suicide in the family due to depression within the last year leading to him starting to drink even before the mission happened, his marriage is strained and fell apart shortly after this, and NASA changed First Man from him to Armstrong a few months before the mission and made excuses as to why. He doesn't need a "fake moon landing" to be upset. He's doing just fine on his own.
    1
  47.  @revanknight7316  "Nobody is happy when having to lie. " Really? Your leaders do it while grinning like the cat that ate the canary.
    1
  48.  @revanknight7316  The truth is a hell of a drug. Maybe you should try it instead of kissing your "truth movement"'s ass clean after they've been caught lying for the hundredth time like you have a scat fetish
    1
  49.  @fthprodphoto-video5357  .... who said anything about suicidal? it was the mother that was suicidal. And they'd already hired him before he started. Did they know he had started drinking? Was it at the point of impairment yet?
    1
  50.  @Ezekiel903  And yet your fake truth movement has to lie constantly...🤔
    1