Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. It's "only property," they say, but loss of property can ruin your life, your family's lives, and even cause your and their deaths, as you sink into despair because all your hard work is snatched away in an instant. Property crimes are not far removed from actual murder, in my opinion. Thieves literally steal your life energy. At what point is that fatal?
    18
  2. There are too few of them.
    12
  3. Maybe you'll grow out of being a dem.
    10
  4. No way. It's too big an opportunity to line their and their cronies' pockets.
    10
  5.  @dabblerdeluxe775  It's not our country!
    8
  6.  @vinista256  Trump's way better than any Democrat alternative.
    6
  7. Wow! People still watch lying ABC?
    6
  8. Hmmm. Ever change your mind after comment #7? I'm starting to think that would make sense. We should start hammering out the details of something like that, or aiming towards something like that, because I don't think anybody's hatin' on anybody. We - most of us - just think trans women make a mockery of women's sports and do harm to all young biological women in order to cater to the dysphoria of a very small number of people. "Your wiring doesn't match your plumbing. That's the bad news. The good news is you're going to be a much better athlete than you thought you were."
    6
  9. I think the emphasis on building houses that are virtually air-tight makes the problem worse for air-breathers. I've got windows open, year-round. Run the house fan most of the time, except peak heat times.
    5
  10.  @Swansong-recorders  I despise the Republican hierarchy, but I support Trump. He was correct on all the big issues.
    4
  11. Maybe if Biden had followed Trump's deal, the Taliban wouldn't've been so motivated to force things along. Biden just basically said "The USA lied to you. Again."
    4
  12.  @RuleofFive  Which ER/ICU doctors are you talking about? The ones on legacy media or the ones they de-platform? If the protocols for treatment were sensible, 99% of people presenting with symptoms would be successfully treated as outpatients. But they give them cough syrup and send them home to get sicker, without the benefit of corticosteroids or HCQ or 1v3rm3ct1n, which, if I spelled it correctly, would be removed from the comments by censors. Who, on the side of truth, resorts to censorship? ICU doctors are only in the conversation when the front-line doctors FAIL. And this virus is totally treatable, and has been since the beginning. But doctors treating thousands in front-line clinics with 99.98% success rate without long-lasting symptoms are SILENCED. Why is that? Why aren't YOU asking that? Try educating yourself by reading the Great Barrington Declaration and put this whole atrocity in its proper scientific, epidemiological, and historical context.
    4
  13. It will, as soon as it no longer serves the interests of the DNC. Same with riots and looting.
    4
  14. Gotta keep the gravy train going. Gotta have an excuse to set aside your and my civil rights.
    4
  15. Statistics 101: The probability of a false positive is very high when the disease, itself, is rare.
    3
  16. Most states aren't set up for mail-in. Look at the record. It's already failed in the primaries in first-time states. Much easier to just vote the old way with social distancing. Get the facts on mail-in fraud. You won't get it on ABC News, because they really want it all to be mail-in. Doesn't even have to be deliberate fraud. Just bungling by election commissions and voters.
    3
  17.  @RuleofFive  I think your talking point is out of date.
    3
  18. It's a troll on the level of "The Prestige" as far as living the illusion goes.
    3
  19. 50 likes and 667 comments is called "being ratioed." I remember when ABC got the news right once in awhile, back when they still sort of tried.
    3
  20. Yup. When they do their annual spring jihad, spank them! Punish them! Don't occupy them and try to turn them into a middle-east version of ourselves.
    3
  21. The people dying from COVID are people with co-morbidities, like obesity, diabetes, heart ailments, etc. For the vast majority of the population, it's a bad cold. The risks of the jab do not justify the benefits. "But it's 25 times better than unvaccinated!" Yes. You cut your probability of dying from 0.0025% to 0.0001%.
    3
  22. Then there would be NO safe haven from medical tyranny.
    3
  23. I came looking for news. I got a bunch of opinion. No wonder I never watch ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/MSNBC any more.
    2
  24. +Sam: There are a LOT of people who breathed a huge sigh of relief that it'd be Trump, rather than Clinton, making the next set of SCOTUS appointments. You see it as slipping into the abyss. We see it as clawing our way back OUT of the abyss.
    2
  25.  @TakenTook  Knowing this, why don't you advocate for HCQ and Ivermectin and monoclonal antibody treatments to be fast-tracked at LeAST as aggressively as the untested jab. I'm gonna start calling you smug loudmouths "jabbers."
    2
  26.  @salsa564  Losing the freedom to refuse an experimental drug. I guess you never heard of the Tuskegee Airmen. Or Dr. Mengele. Or Nuremberg.
    2
  27.  @whoami252  What do you call them, then, because they damn sure aren't vaccines! They're something else. Some other kind of experimental therapy/drug.
    2
  28.  @forvalhalla7754  Yes. There're thousands of doctors and nurses who are just as skeptical as you or I about the wisdom of these so-called vaccines. I remember when speaking truth to power was considered brave and noble. Now the people who most love that saying are siding with power and the curated content they receive obscures the truth. I hope I'm wrong about all this. But there's just been too much censorship and rush to jab. There's been too much overreaction and most of it irrational. "We're going to save you if it KILLS YOU!"
    2
  29. ABC: "Anything but candor."
    2
  30. If the public-health mafia didn't restrict the availability of Ivermectin, people wouldn't have to buy the kind for livestock. It's the same drug. Just like horse shampoo is as good as the beauty-parlor kind, but under a different label. When will you guys figure out that ABC and the U.S. government aren't your friend?
    2
  31. Sweden, where they don't wear masks, never did lock-downs, and are doing just fine.
    2
  32.  @ericphelps1686  Just the News, Epoch Times, and other straight news organizations are much better.
    2
  33. Democrats are mobilizing their poor-sport brigades to character-assassinate whomever Trump appoints. But as Kennedy's retirement is a full month away, there's a good chance their short attention spans will have them off tilting at some other windmill by that time. Also, the ranks of the brigade appear to be thinning, and their fitness for action is flagging.
    2
  34. Now that Biden is president, this news is no longer censored, and it's OK for ABC to report on it, now.
    2
  35. People still watch ABC? Really? BWAHAHAHAHA!
    2
  36.  @papawheelie5576  Atlas is shrugging and all the king's men are tumbling.
    2
  37. It turns out that most people don't track the shifting narratives as each one before them implodes of its own falsity.
    2
  38. What a liar. CRT is pushed throughout the education system, except in some rural school districts. Doesn't matter if the state's red or blue. The education apparat is full-on socialist.
    2
  39. So, ABC pushes a hoax for 3 years, and this is as close to a retraction as we'll ever get from this failing network.
    2
  40. Vax or no vax is a false dichotomy. One has to ask why there's so much pressure AGAINST making Ivermectin and HCQ available. You would think if they were sincere about ending the pandemic, they would try MULTIPLE strategies. Why can't people be open-minded about this? Why can't people be scientific about this? Multiple working hypotheses is how science is done. All that's ALLOWED is one hypothesis. In the UK under NHS, you can't even GET Ivermectin or HCQ.
    2
  41. They and all socialists see things only in terms of power, and mostly only to garner more for themselves. But hey. They're smarter than everybody else, right? I mean that's what everybody on their side always says, right?
    2
  42. Look at how that crowd's not practicing social distancing, then hear the remarks insisting that mail-in ballots are essential.
    2
  43.  @cranberryeater7459  Ain't gonna happen. Deal with it.
    2
  44. I'm on the "Enforce the Law" side, but this guy is just a wind-up toy, with rehearsed talking points. I see this more often from the left, but I don't like it from either side.
    1
  45. Yes. Anyone who opposes Demokkkrat narratives must be attacked by national news media.
    1
  46. It's weather. It happens.
    1
  47.  @bonesingram4911  I just wish everyone who said they'd leave when Trump was elected in 2016 had actually left.
    1
  48. Smart, axer351.
    1
  49. A total collapse of morality and ethics.
    1
  50. @Olivia P All topics are debatable. And it is a fact that the fossil record doesn't show a gradual change from one species to the next. You see trilobites for millions of years, essentially unchanged, and then suddenly they're all gone and there's something else entirely in that niche. I'm not saying evolution isn't a thing. But it's more of a punctuated RADICAL change, but when that change is underway, there's scarce little paleontological evidence left behind, so for such a strong theory, the evidence is very scarce. Hell, we're not even really sure what "species" means. Some species interbreed successfully, but the offspring are sterile (mules). Some anthropologists would argue that Neanderthals were just a variation on homo sapiens (or vice versa). Plant and animal husbandry are variation of species a la Darwin, by human design. But if you could build a jig to make it possible like Dad did the one time the Chihuahua mix was in heat and our foxhound mix was horny, by putting her on a cinder block and letting them go at it, all the dog breeds can still interbreed and have viable offspring, so we haven't really managed any new speciation, after millennia of selective breeding. I'm more of a punctuated evolution sort of guy. In times of cataclysm, a few radical mutations survive and spread. But at the beginning, there are so few of them, the chances of finding their fossilized remains is minuscule. Hence trilobites until no trilobites. The paucity of fossil records gives the religious types all the ammo they need to confirm what they already believe. The Grand Canyon tells me this Earth is at LEAST many hundreds of millions of years old.
    1