Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "ABC News"
channel.
-
1
-
@daw7773 ... whereas the CDC peer-reviews its own stuff with its own picked scientists. I can find scientists to this day who will swear nicotine isn't addictive. All I have to do is pay them enough. And there are more ways of paying than just money. There's position. There's THREATs to your position. Same thing happened with climate science. And "peer review" in MANY disciplines, these days, is a total joke, especially in the humanities and climate science.
Hell, they took Mein Kampf and changed "Jew" to "white man," threw in some popular CRT jargon, and won awards.
But of course, you've never even heard of Sokal, Boghossian, Lindsey or Pluckrose, have you? Your information is very heavily curated, and you're not even aware of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1