Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Not if the politicians and Big Pharma have any say in the matter!
    85
  2. They're sub-clinical until you keel over.
    44
  3.  @pagaporvista569  Show me the time series data on humans treated with COVID vaccine. There isn't any that's longer than 2 years.
    25
  4.  @leebroadway929  Veterinarian supply. The doses are clearly explained, based on the weight of the "animal" being treated, and for purpose.
    24
  5. We had stronger protocols than that, before they tore up the book to push their New Thing.
    21
  6. Saying you're less likely to be hospitalized if vaxxed doesn't factor in the criminal withholding of early treatments, especially when the hospital knows you're unvaxxed. NONE of this conversation addresses long-term effects of the vaxx, and that risk factor needs to be a part of every conversation. Without that, short-term hospitalization rates are stripped of their true meaning.
    18
  7. I noticed everybody at work who got the flu shot every year got the flu every winter.
    16
  8. Legislators, bureaucrats and all who cater to their whims.
    14
  9. But the harm they inflict in the meantime is deadly.
    12
  10. They did what they were told on the promise of a return to normalcy. Now they realize that doing what they're told only prolongs the agony.
    12
  11. They did the same thing to my share. Protecting the ignorance of their NPC customer base.
    12
  12.  @miles6910  And you're ignoring the rather extensive resume offered in a subsequent comment. You're just being a troll.
    10
  13.  @nosuchthing8  I believe you are factually incorrect. Ivermectin is part of "health packs" distributed in at least one Indian province, which has virtually wiped out COVID-19, for very little money.
    10
  14. The vaccines are being mandated because they already jumped the shark with lock-downs and mask-wearing, and to do any less would expose the last 18 months of response as the lunacy it is.
    9
  15.  @Julemand69  Avoid them at all costs. They're working for everybody but you, the patient.
    9
  16. I bet a large percentage of cases now go unreported, because people are afraid of doctors, now. I know I've lost all faith in them.
    9
  17. THIS! And where's the big push for production and distribution and information-sharing about treatments that work the best? There isn't any. There's just the lock-down-and-take-experimental-drug avenue being entertained by an out-of-touch, cowardly and greedy public-health establishment, and ENORMOUS profit for the drug companies whose bidding they do. Ivermectin? Can't talk about it. Can't get it. Quinine/HCQ? Can't talk about it. Can't get it. Other treatment regimens? Can't talk about them. Can't get them. You MUST take the jab, because Holy Pfizer says so! The same Big Pharma that's been sued and lost MANY times in the past for putting their profits ahead of the health and well-being of their customers. It's criminal.
    9
  18. Exactly.
    9
  19. ... and yet, if this good doctor were penniless and starving, he wouldn't have the leisure or the means to crank out videos every day or three.
    8
  20.  @JohnAPrins  Every bit of comfort, security and stability is being systematically snatched away. They're creating their own, highly motivated opposition.
    7
  21.  @OhSoddit  Small business just won't quit. And now, after the test run, the general public will no longer comply. We now have natural immunity to the old song and dance. They'll need a new crisis, and I see at least 2 or 3 incoming.
    7
  22.  @jordanleo  "Cases" don't scare me. Mortality rates are of more concern, and nations that place all their faith in "vaccines" that obviously don't work against new strains are ignoring - even suppressing - safe and effective treatments that would save much money, suffering and death.
    7
  23.  @marie-joelleraussou  Yes. It's appalling, especially in the USA, where the constitution is VERY explicit about freedom of speech and freedom of association. Authoritarians are ALWAYS looking for a crisis to use as an excuse for their abuse of power. I've never seen it go this far, before, but we've been headed this way for a long time. The thing that's most appalling to me is that the criminals who CAUSED the pandemic were the ones put in charge of responding to it! And they still are in charge! They should've bee pilloried in 2020, but there's Fauci, on t.v., misinforming everyone on a daily basis. It's disgusting.
    6
  24.  @-johnny-deep-  Being a fan of so-called "MSM" is your first mistake.
    6
  25. The only COVID news I'm interested in at this point are arrests of public health officials.
    6
  26. They're residing in a world that grants them as much power as possible.
    6
  27. They're quite adept at making mountains out of molehills and conversely.
    5
  28.  @miles6910  Then do so and quit talkin' smack.
    5
  29. All that's in the past, now that they have the government's backing. (Horrific)
    5
  30. I remember him citing WHO and CDC as authoritative sources.
    5
  31.  @ollieraison  Translation: I bought into the BS and now I want everyone to remember how it was. We remember how it was, and we also thought it was terrible, just for different reasons than you at the time.
    5
  32. Injecting children with an experimental drug to combat an illness that is no danger to them is child abuse.
    4
  33. Yes. The data is garbage.
    4
  34. A lot of people in your age group bought themselves immune issues for the rest of their shortened lives, I fear.
    4
  35. In Africa, they don't suppress the use of HCQ or Ivermectin.
    4
  36.  @Yahawadah70ad  Is that vegan diet with or without glyphosate and atrazine, or is it American vegan?
    4
  37. It actually describes someone like me, pretty well. Day-to-day, no beers or whiskey, but not against it or afraid of it.
    4
  38. You mean the ones who destroy the environment and then preach at us about greenhouse gases?
    3
  39.  @ms.q7445  Keep in mind, Pfizer's a major advertiser on FOX and everybody on FOX claims to have been jabbed, and they mostly talk about "People wouldn't be so hesitant if the establishment would be open and honest about what's happening."
    3
  40. Healthy young people keeling over from heart attacks in the news every day. Nothing to see, here.
    3
  41. "Michelle Walensky's a doctor. I'm sure she's not doing that." (Dismissing natural immunity.) I'm not at all all sure she's not doing that. There ARE many parents "eagerly awaiting" the vaccine for their children. Most of them are desperate to get back to some kind of normal, because they are at wit's end trying to deal with their children without a guaranteed 6 or 7 hours per day of free baby-sitting.
    3
  42. I'm not sure that it happens more in the military-industrial complex. There are other complexes, like the media, medical industry, forest industry, you name it. If the government regulates it, big business is going to try to hijack the agency responsible. This has been true since the 19th Century, when the first federal agencies were created, like the Interstate Commerce Commission. Creating those agencies make rule-manipulation-for-your-benefit a one-stop-shopping experience for robber barons.
    3
  43. It's good to care. I end up spending everything helping people a lot closer to home.
    3
  44. LOL! Anxiety about the improperly tested Jab is why I didn't get jabbed! It was a bit depressing when it SEEMED like the whole world was against me, but the whole world seemed to be processing the available information very poorly! Listening to Campbell in his early days on YouTube, he respected the Party Line. He got swept up in that first net.
    3
  45. So does the jab bring a higher risk of cancer down the road? You don't know? Of COURSE you don't know. The risk of the vax is unknown and unknowable at this time. Pericarditis and myocarditis aren't the only things that might crop up at some point down the road. SILENCE on that unknown aspect of the risk of an experimental drug. Where's the info on the treatments available and the latest info on THEM? Oh. Nobody's talking about any of that. Front-line clinicians are being censored.
    3
  46. Especially the fact-checkers smeared him.
    3
  47. Are they controlling for treatment regimens? I fear that there're 2 tiers of treatments: one for the jabbed and another for the unjabbed. Maybe not everywhere, but in quite a few places. In my opinion the standard of care tends to be pretty low, generally, with most people being denied treatments that work, especially in the early stages. "Here's some cough syrup. Come back when your lips are blue."
    3
  48.  @colinsdad1  People with an axe to grind are the most eager to be heard. It's just human nature. So you slurp up what the lefties and righties say and ask yourself "What are they leaving out?"
    3
  49. Yes, Bill. "We" did a terrible job on therapeutics, censoring clinical results that were too good. Thousands of doctors in the front lines arrived at excellent treatments. They were all censored and banned from the public square. Anything that didn't make you money was eliminated from the conversation. I'm sure that was just a coincidence.
    3
  50. 2nd-degree murder.
    3