Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. I always theorized that you take out of a hallucinogenic experience what you take into it, whether you know you're packing baggage or not. I always felt like it tore down the walls between conscious and sub-conscious. Whatever ends of worms there are buried in your mind can be seen and dealt with. Those worms can also give you a "bad trip." I think the standard wormy bits revolve around existential angst. We can bury thoughts of death MOST of the time, but it's always percolating under the surface, which is why there were so many stories of "Jesus freaks" in LSD circles. They can't hide from the abyss when these drugs bare their subconscious. I had a bad trip of my own, but somehow realized at some point that I was projecting my own fears on the world around me in that state. I'd beware using them around the "wrong people," and determining who the right people are can be problematic. I wrestled with my own demons at what started out as parties, many a time. Some people were toxic, some were vulnerable, some were contemplative. Nobody really knew what they were doing, and some had "bad trips." IMO, nobody set out to mess with somebody's head, but a lot of that took place. Under the influence, I could read a room like nobody's business. I KNEW things about people I had never met. iMO, it was because my subconscious picks up on clues that my conscious mind doesn't. Ordinarily, I'd just get a feeling about somebody, but not be able to put my finger on why, even though that feeling eventually proved to be correct.
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. It's very difficult to tell how much good was actually done by such things as Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Those acts aren't passed without a critical mass within the larger society that support it. And with that critical mass comes all the social and market forces for greener products and services. I'm not sure we accomplished as much with legislation as taking that same money and beefing up our tort system, so that it's easier for individuals to sue big corporations. By the time the government steps in and pretends to lead, the society's already changing things, organically. With laws and regs, you could still be doing a great deal of harm with your paper plant's SO2 emissions, even though the EPA says you meet the government's standard for SO2 emissions, even though everybody downwind of that paper plant has to breathe that nasty-smelling stuff. If not for the EPA, it's even conceivable that social pressure would've pushed paper plants to switch to a chlorite (ClO3) process that's actually CHEAPER and pollutes less, because society's own organic means of self-improvement wouldn't be as atrophied as our dependence on government to protect us from everything hadn't atrophied those built-in mechanisms. People would be more aware and more active if they couldn't kid themselves that Uncle Sam will make everything OK for us. If government weren't running interference, the sulfite process might already be abandoned. Its ONLY advantage is that your pretty white toilet paper doesn't turn yellow after 2 months on the shelf. I think people would be OK with yellowish or beige toilet paper if they knew that the white stuff meant more pollution. It'd be a great way to virtue signal when you have people over for a party! But the government says it's OK for your whole town to smell like monkey butt.
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1