Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Sky News Australia"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a descendant of Druids and a closet tree-hugger, I believe humans can and should be a positive force in the ecosystem.
That doesn't mean I think authoritarian use of force by misguided and under-educated politicians, bureaucrats, and self-interested robber barons (who ALWAYS feast when government intervenes) will get us to a better place.
Look. People care about the environment more than ever before in human history. Environmental friendliness is a deeply inculcated value in our culture (USA). You want a greener planet? De-regulate and cut taxes. Compensate for the de-regulation by putting 10% of the money wasted on government agencies into the TORT SYSTEM. Make it quick and easy for the common man to sue anyone - including a mega-corporation - for ANY harm caused by that company.
You think companies wouldn't clean up their act? All of a sudden, a $10,000 check to the regional rep for the EPA does you no good. You just better not dump that stuff in the river, because of the millions of little guys downstream who can take a $10,000 swipe at you in, say, small claims. Don't need more laws and regs. Just need a tort system that's robust enough to handle a gazillion LITTLE cases, expeditiously.
As a libertarian, I think if you removed government barriers to competition, every home with a yard and a tree or trees would have a rocket stove mass heater that you could always heat your house and make hot water and cook with, no matter what happened to the grid, plus you'd have a really clean and efficient backup heat system. But due to regulations, I don't think there're more than one or two companies who make rocket mass heaters that are UL listed and be covered by homeowner's insurance.
What there SHOULD be is 1,000 or 10,000 guys out there, all making rocket mass heaters (RMHs), in competition with each other for performance, safety, ease of use and durability. We don't have that. Why? Because government insists on "helping" us with everything. How did things ever improve before government stepped in with regulations? Regular customers and the rewards of treating people right. There'll always be fly-by-nighters, but in an unregulated market, you just go by the company's REPUTATION, and it's hard for anybody without a reputation to break in. They have to offer really good deals just so people will try them out. None of that requires a government overseer...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The education establishment defines passing as "success." The easiest way to get more "success" is to lower standards. They put all kinds of edu-babble around it, but speaking as a teacher, the downward pressure on standards is always there, no matter how they dress it up.
Where I work, they now push "co-requisites" for college algebra, because students are so poorly prepared for it. So we spend hundreds of thousands of dollars per pupil in k-12, and none of it matters. The college is force-feeding high-school (intermediate) algebra to students on a "just in time" basis, so now college algebra is college algebra plus all the stuff you were supposed to learn, but we know you didn't, because we know k-12 sucks. It's a horrific waste of taxpayer money. It's a HUGE duplication of effort, if you count k-12 as "effort."
It increases the cost of a college education, waters down college education, and never gets at the root of the problem, which is social promotion in k-12.
But at least we're brimming over with "success!"
1
-
1