Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Sky News Australia"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
They were all going to "enjoy unusually heavy snow fall." Sounds like rich people on ski holiday.
That would explain why so many died. Rich people tend not to take the gear with them. It would be inconvenient to do all that packing and hauling baggage around. It's easier to just buy the gear after they get there. I can see rich people and/or lowlands/city people getting themselves in trouble. I doubt anybody from the area died.
I used to live in Gunnison, Colorado, and I saw a lot of that. Rich people fly in, buy the gear they need, and then sell it before they leave (actually dump it at 2nd-hand shop on consignment). It's like renting, only they never have to use anything that's tainted by somebody else.
Lots of 2nd-hand gear that's just been used once in places like that. Gunnison is just down the road from Crested Butte, where there's some world class powder (snow. not cocaine). I bought some high-quality gear at bargain prices by living there. $300 GoreTex jacket for $80. Not a thing wrong with it. Good-as-new Sorels for $30.
I'm more like you. I've traveled all over the American Rocky Mountain West and NorthWest, following my trade around the region, with lots of trips back home and to various places I wanted to see. And I lived on the road pretty much the same as I lived at the house, right down to the dishes and cookware I used in the kitchen. I'm a lot older, now and can afford separate camp kitchen, but I still go on the road the same way I always did. Raiding the kitchen the day before you leave is just automatic! LOL!
Getting trapped in a snow storm would just be a chance to camp where they'd ordinarily chase you off!
All that being said, perishing of the cold and/or dehydration is an unexpected and unpleasant end for ANYbody. My heart goes out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@iggy5347 Yes, the people in Hong Kong were more free under Great Britain than they will be under China. But the British had no right to even BE there to HAVE a Hong Kong, in the first place, and what they did in the Opium Wars is a blot on British history.
That being said, I consider Hong Kong to BE China, at this point, and I don't want Mainland products passed off as made by free people in free Hong Kong, when they aren't. Any special privileges enjoyed by Hong Kong should cease as soon as possible, because it's 100% China, now, no matter how they dress it up. And I don't want cheaper products at the price of propping up tyranny. If it's not obvious that China is an oppressive and tyrannical totalitarian state under CCP, then you need to catch up on your China Uncensored.
I think China becomes a backwater if we hold it accountable and insist on fair and transparent trade. They don't meet the transparency or fairness criteria. They're rogue traders we did a favor to allow into the world trade community, on the assumption that they would behave better if we treated them nice. We know beyond a doubt that they just kept up with their same old ways. We don't need to fight them. But we don't need to do business with them, either.
2
-
It depends on who's in charge. Under Bush's, Clinton and Obama, it was non-stop de-stabilization and regime change, functionally identical to colonial empires of the 17th - 20th Centuries, only with better tech and more sophisticated media.
There's a mind-set in the foreign-policy establishment that insists that we not abandon x, y or z because we made promises to freedom fighters. If we abandon the Kurds, it will make it harder for us to recruit freedom fighters in the future! That was Bolton's thinking. I think Trump foolishly let himself get talked into protecting those oil fields in NE Syria, on behalf of the Kurds.
There's all this bad policy that was justified during the Cold War and now there's a "sunk-cost fallacy" embedded in all their thinking. Rather than cut their losses and admit that meddling extra-legally, abroad, is just non-stop blowback, they talk about all the years and money investing in "developing assets abroad." Well, maybe the American people don't want U.S.-funded paramilitary all over the planet. Today's freedom fighter is tomorrow's terrorist. Our foreign-policy wonks set us up for this, time and time again, and are never held accountable. Their main skill is in smearing those who dare challenge them or call them to account.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sypher0101 : You got it right except for the "far right" piece. But everybody gets the left-right thing wrong, especially now, after decades of the left being on top, becoming the establishment, and as such, becoming the new "conservative."
Meh. None of it matters. A critical mass, a super-majority of Westerners, now basically believe in a fascist setup, with government running education and health care, just like Bismarck taught Hitler. We see how the Nazis brainwashed entire generations and then we turn right around and defend public schools under centralized control.
AFAIC, government programs were invented to maintain the ascendancy of the existing political class. Industrialization had us common folk getting mighty independent, creative, and uppity, so the ruling elites had to do something to put the focus back on them. The people finally weaned themselves off the Jünkers, and immediately hopped in Der Fuehrer's lap. Nobody learned from WW II. We became what we said we were fighting.
We're absolute dumb-asses, when you get right down to it. Staring us in the face. And nobody sees it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1