Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5.  @JIMDEZWAV  "Misinformation" is whatever the establishment deems it to be. Last year's conspiracy theory is this year's "Well, of course that's what's happening!" Lab-leak hypothesis? Censored. Why? To keep Dr. Fauci's cabal out of jail and above suspicion, while they engineer the stupidest response to an epidemic in history, while we worship political appointees as the only scientists we're allowed to listen to. "Don't deny the science!" But I remember when the tobacco companies had a line of scientists stretching clear out the door swearing on the Bible that nicotine wasn't addictive and smoking didn't cause cancer. COVID can ONLY be treated by Big Pharma vaccine. Shut up about any other treatment you kook! Don't talk about survival rates for COVID for people who aren't over 65 with co-morbidities. Let's just quarantine everybody. It'll be fine. Scientists don't suddenly become 100% wise and truthful when they get their diplomas. As a scientist/mathematician, I can make things look any way you want them, and I can make it stick, too, if you silence everyone who questions my data manipulations. In multivariate settings, you can crank out whatever result you want, just by tweaking one or two coefficients in your model or throwing out "problematic" data. That's at the root of climate-change hysteria. No, I'm not a "denier." I just have a difference of opinion with the power-grabbers as to how significant our impact is and DEFINITELY part from the establishment when it comes to their self-enriching, fascistic "solutions," which even the experts admit will do little to solve the problem, while costing the poor and middle class ENORMOUSLY. "Sorry, Mrs. Jones. You're going to have to freeze to death this winter because we're going to raise the cost of energy beyond your ability to keep your home heated. It's for your own good. I'm saving you, don't you see? YOU are destroying the planet. Not us, with our private jets and military consumption (Biggest consumer of fossil fuels), which comes before the planet's needs (apparently). China can keep on polluting as much as it wants, of course. We don't need to crush THEIR people. They're already crushed."
    2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49.  @bobegan2865  With few exceptions, the apparatchiks of BOTH parties are big-government interventionists, at home and abroad. There are some differences in how they go about it, but philosophically, the bipartisanship in our government runs very deep. The Democrats will create and maintain high tensions. The Republicans will do the same, and are more likely to see things boil over into boots-on-the-ground war. Trump's one of few presidents who stood up to the apparatchiks and started taking one pan after another off the fire. This was INFURIATING to foreign-policy and defense wonks (and their war-industry cronies), and they're the ones the whole RussiaGate hoax came from. It got so Trump was afraid to do much of anything, for fear of being accused of being 'literally Hitler.' And even when he was very specific about troop drawdowns, his own administration defied him and kept our people deployed behind his back. One ambassador was caught joking about it, quite openly. They KNEW the fix was in. If Trump had had another 4 years, back-to-back, we'd have a smaller footprint abroad AND peace, and we wouldn't be dependent on the communist Chinese for ANYthing. It was urgent for the "ruling class" in the USA that he be removed. No surprise, every Democrat-run institution was out to get him, and that includes virtually ALL government agencies, including the military, which Obama did his best to fill with party hacks and woke. It spread to all government contractors and of course much of it started in the education system, which is 99% Democrat. I love the way the establishment calls taking out a dissenter as "speaking truth to power." smh Anyway, I'm struggling to get to the point I wanted to make about Biden. Yes, he's obviously not up to snuff, but when you vote a guy in over another guy, you're really voting for their STAFF. It's the staff who run everything. You think Obama's a nuclear engineer? Presidents are only as good as the people they have around them. A lot of those people serve multiple presidents. They can expedite orders or slow-walk orders. There's all kinds of ways to thwart a president, without seeming to. This has been done for inbred royalty for centuries. When I complain about what the admin's doing, it's really a complaint against the DNC establishment who engineered his nomination and eventual election. Some say the engineering of the election was fortified by a lot of cheating, but again, that goes to the people HANDLING Biden.
    2
  50. 2