Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "The Onion"
channel.
-
56
-
49
-
48
-
24
-
23
-
10
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@relic6457 : That's not what he's saying, at all. Just saying there are big, hairy gays and they use the term "bear." I didn't know that, myself, but it made sense when I heard it. Heaven forbid I should learn something from someone different from me. Of course, you can't learn from people just like yourself, because you already know everything they know, amirite? SJWs ruin diversity concept, but it really is a cool thing, and kind of the basis of our ornery, unruly, smart and big-hearted nation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They KNOW they're right about EVERYthing, and so any dissent is obviously ignorant hate speech, because we ALL know that people mustn't hear anything "bad" for their own protection. These are people who know anything not in the Washington Post or New York Times or CNN must be false, because only THOSE outlets are reliable and will "protect them" from wrong think. These are people who prop up the corporatocracy while pretending to hate it. SMH. They get their facts from legacy media that are owned by a handful of MEGACORPORATIONS and they dismiss anything the megacorporations don't approve as "conspiracy theories."
It's very sad. Many are pretty smart people, in some ways.
But they don't ask themselves why it's OK to go to the casino, but not OK to go to church. Or why it's OK to go to WalMart and other big-box chains, but the corner bodega is closed until further notice. It's OK to protest AGAINST Trump and the police, but it's NOT OK to demonstrate for anything of which they disapprove, because "these idiots are literally going to get us all killed." THEIR protest is "more important" than concerns about contagion.
Or the story about the crazy people on the beach without masks, while the whole crew BEHIND the CNN camera aren't wearing masks, either. The hits just keep coming.
I especially loved Obama's eulogy, in a packed church, insisting that universal mail-in ballots were ESSENTIAL, because of the virus. That same church probably limited attendance to a nobody's funeral to 10 people. But if there's an opportunity to score points for the DNC, well, then it's just too important to worry about the virus.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nerida3347 : When they do that, they cease being a platform, and lose special protections from liability. If they're going to get a pass on account of being a neutral platform, then they need to be a neutral platform. If they're not a neutral platform, and nobody but Congress believes that they ARE, then they're subject to the same rules applying to any publisher. They can't have it both ways. Of course, you're all about "private company can do what it wants" when that private company is biased in your political direction.
Me, personally, I would like it to be no-holds-barred, and if you don't like what's being said, BLOCK IT, and get on with your damn life. But liberals love to appeal to authority.
YouTube sucks because there's no block feature. You can tell on somebody to Mommy YouTube, but you can't just pull the plug on somebody and be free of them forevermore. But you CAN get Mommy YouTube to shut them UP forevermore. People like you seem to prefer appealing to authority to de-platform people you don't like. In a free and open forum, Nazis get zero traction. In a censorious setting, they actually have a legitimate gripe, and win recruits. you people are your own worst enemies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1