Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "John Stossel" channel.

  1. If Congress EVER did its job correctly, it would be a part-time job, and sessions would last maybe a month or two. A handful of hearings to oversee a MUCH SMALLER federal government. But the more they legislate, the more they're obliged to legislate, and the more difficult REAL OVERSIGHT becomes. The federal government is mission creep on steroids, and it all starts with bureaucrat solutions to the human condition, when the human condition is not even a problem to be solved, and if it is a problem, the last people you should entrust with a solution are the people in government.
    40
  2. To a man who's never done a day's labor in his life, "shovel-ready" means "My buddies all get rich."
    23
  3. When he says "regional" health care in a country as small as Sweden, he's basically saying "Counties manage their own health care." Sweden is a nation of about 10 million people. We have cities with almost as many people. One thing the Scandinavian countries have done is keep the capital gains taxes much lower than in the USA.
    23
  4. "We have no idea how to make our fantasies come true, so let's burn everything down and assume we'll figure it all out."
    22
  5.  @shawnpatton3795  Same deal. But here's how it works in the USA: If you DON'T lobby and donate to Congressional campaigns and generally enrich and empower Congress, then Congress will go after you. Bill Gates wasn't political until Congress went after him, threatening to break up his company. Then he got VERY political, bending the government, itself, to his will, when originally, he wanted nothing to do with politics. But once he took an interest and started spreading money around, Congress lost all interest in going after Microsoft, and became Microsoft's best friend.
    16
  6. You know a channel is over the target and gaining subscribers when YouTube starts putting those banners up. "Too many people listening to the truth. We must stop it!"
    10
  7. I think it's just cascading stupidity and greed. But yeah, it all leads to authoritarian rule and deprivation for the average person.
    10
  8. The sad thing is that the whole anthropogenic warming thru CO2 emissions isn't really representative of history. The main effect of added CO2, which has mostly been caused over time BY warming (rather than the current tail-wagging-the-dog theory), is increased plant growth. Bumping CO2 levels in the atmosphere might be the one GOOD thing about all the shit we dump into the atmosphere! I've never heard this take on the Paris Accords, though I did read enough of the varying levels of commitment from the various countries to know something was up, when I read the U.S.'s commitment. It was like we were to give up everything and everyone else give up nothing.
    9
  9.  @8is  I'm no economist, but I can see how tariffs could cause more harm than they help. I have a hard time accepting that income tax is somehow less bad.
    8
  10. Yes. The hockey-stick was manufactured and ALL IPCC predictions have been WAY over what was actually measured. But they still insist! I think that for all we know, CO2 emissions are keeping us from a much worse cooling and desert-ification of more lands. Instead, the higher CO2 in the air seems to be good for plants! Nature has many buffering agents, in addition to variable solar emissions over time. Historically, warming trends have been generally beneficial. Cool and dry has usually meant war and famine (or famine and war).
    7
  11.  Real Actual News  He's pretty socialist. He offers some improvements for how they ADMINISTER socialism, but it still comes down to Peter robbing Paul to take care of Mary. Peter doesn't care about spending Paul's money wisely, and he doesn't really care if Mary gets back on her feet. He has nothing at stake. I think Universal Basic Income makes sense if it's a J. Peter Grace "negative income tax" kind of deal. Grace Commission proposed negative income tax when Reagan was president. The idea was to bring everyone up to the poverty line and leave the rest up to them. Eliminate HHS and all federal programs and just pay you the difference between what you earn and a basic subsistence level. It would reduce the federal bureaucracy SIGNIFICANTLY. But I don't think that's what Yang's proposing. He just wants to give away $1,000 per month, so teenagers and 20-somethings can live like college students without owning anything. Just get 3 or 4 people who want to share a house and sing kum-bye-ah until you retire. Very attractive to young people, who want to hang out and party. Maybe work on their guitar or basket-weaving skills... I put Yang in sort of a Tulsi Gabbard category. He says things neither establishment party wants to hear. It's just not a good enough reason to vote for him. He also has a serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He bought the MSM characterization of Trump, without giving him credit for the things Trump was right about, like immigration, regulatory capture, reducing our military footprint abroad, getting politics out of the classroom, making cities pay their own way by curtailing MASSIVE state-and-local-tax writeoffs for big-spending cities, shifting the tax burden from big-spending blue city governments to flyover country, getting government out of the way of working stiffs and small businesses. Of course, everything good Trump did with regard to the last two got wiped out by COVID.
    6
  12.  @jason200912  You have ZERO evidence that private education would create huge oligopolies. What creates oligopolies and gives them inordinate power over our lives is government intervention. GOVERNMENT is the SOURCE and the protector of crony capitalism!
    6
  13.  @evanking6737  I never got the impression he was a fascist. Definitely a dirty old man. What'd he do/say that was so fascist? Did you read his "Expanded Universe?" Seems like he understood and inveighed against fascism. More of a libertarian than its opposite (fascism/communism/socialism (all pretty much different faces of the same beast)).
    4
  14.  @ricardocalderon9823  If he's successful, then it WILL be financially successful. Government's the only real obstacle to prosperity in the current era. It's also the biggest obstacle to living more in balance with the environment. Covering the land with glass and propellers isn't saving the planet.
    4
  15.  @selohcin  Yale students? They sounded like cult members, to me.
    3
  16.  GihKaL  : The humanities are pushing a lot of nonsense. Unfortunately, the nature of that nonsense is such that they believe they can impose their will and their dogma on all disciplines. And in a lot of places, they CAN, because the math and science teachers are just as immersed in the culture as the humanities professors. But really, the humanities professors are the ones who should know better. But it's so appealing, because it's wrapped in peer-reviewed respectability, just like the one source of Russiagate was spun into several, because one guy spread the story to multiple media outlets, whose reports were then used by the FBI to say to the FISA court "See? Everybody knows something's going on," just like "Everybody knows Donald Trump is a racist," but nobody has any evidence. It's grade-school stuff, where one big-mouthed kid starts saying Susie has cooties. Such a thing can get traction and cause a kid problems for the rest of their lives. The more I reflect on the last 4 years, it just looks like a bunch of crooks using accusations against others to stay out in front of devastating evidence against THEM that was percolating out in the cloud. Most of what Hillary did wrong was petty and corrupt, but what exposed the underbelly of government was what all her cronies did to cover for her. And then the brazen, false accusations against Trump, whom a SMART media could've made mincemeat of, in the real world, but This Is ClownWorld.
    3
  17.  @cypresscustoms  Everything government touches turns to shit.
    3
  18.  @TimoLevikari  Wood gas. Bio fuels. Homemade methane. It's practical for a farmer or someone with a forested acre or three. Absolutely impractical for city folk.
    2
  19. Not really. Refineries sufficient to fuel an economy are very big, very centralized facilities. Lack of refineries is right up there with lack of power plants.
    2
  20. I would argue that ALL economic systems are capitalist. Even the socialists invest capital in hopes of a return. The DIFFERENCE is Free-Market economics versus Command economics. In free-market capitalism, the PEOPLE control the capital, individually, to do with as they see fit In a command economy, the state controls the capital and does with it as power-seeking government officials see fit. One "brand" of bread. One brand of car. ... And, because there's no profit for the individuals for coming up with new ideas, command economies always fall behind free-market economies in technology. This is why Communist China and the Soviet Union were MUCH better at stealing technology than they were at creating it.
    2
  21. These are the same teacher's unions that INSISTED on lock-downs, not because they care about the students, but because they were afraid of getting cooties from the unwashed masses. It was never about the kids' health or well-being. It was about fat teachers with 10 morbidities afraid of catching the coof from students they really don't like.
    2
  22. Yes. And all the trace elements become depleted, because we take them out of the soil and ship them all over the world.
    2
  23. If Milei succeeds, Argentina could soon be an economic superpower.
    2
  24.  @e.t.9868  Getting a GED gives you all you get from a high school diploma, with a lot less time wasted. One of the things people don't factor in is how far ahead you can get if you just start working as a teenager. When your peers are graduating college with a huge debt, you're buying your first house. I don't have a beef with getting a college degree, but you need to have a career path before you take that plunge.
    2
  25. "Unintended," my ass.
    2
  26. GMO foods have the pesticide built into them. Yummy! This is one issue where I think Stossel is getting it at least partly wrong.
    2
  27. "We didn't intend these consequences. We had no way of knowing." "You had plenty of ways of knowing, starting with the people who warned you about those exact consequences. Remember? You called us 'conspiracy theorists!'"
    2
  28. A person with charisma and wit can do it. But this was a liberal college professor...
    2
  29. I've only read one book by Ayn Rand. It's more of a monograph, entitled "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal." It's the best and best-documented quick take on the history of capitalism and how it's been distorted over the years by an ever-encroaching government.
    2
  30.  @ivercingetorix1367  : Yes. And the conformist, duty-to-the-community that northern climes foster in their people. But someone from outside the culture, who's been living on next-to-nothing is like "Are you kidding? Food, clothing and shelter for free? How many wives did you say I could have?"
    2
  31.  Austin Martín Hernández  : Yes. Shared values and customs and problems. One law for all makes more sense. U.S. Federal Gov't passes blanket legislation on matters that affect EVERYone, regardless of geography and situation. That's why the feds need to keep their noses out of MOST things and leave those things to the several states. Separation of church and state only applies to the federal government, by the way. Virginia had a state religion at the time of the founding. Separation was partly about telling the feds that it was up to Virginia to decide such matters. I thought the Soviets taught us that centralized control of diverse peoples and geography just aren't practical.
    2
  32.  @samwroblewski748  So you think it's good that the plant, itself, has pesticide built into it? What do you think that means for the people who eat that plant? It's not the genetic modification, per se, that's concerning. It's that we're eating plants that contain pesticides and congratulating ourselves that we're not poisoning ourselves with pesticides.
    2
  33. A company would rather do things right than be sued and pay many times over for getting things wrong.
    2
  34. I applaud him when he's on the right side of an issue, but I don't trust him one bit.
    2
  35. Good people know good people.
    2
  36. Cutting USAID was essential. It's a CIA front. It's the major impetus behind regime-change foreign policy. USAID, NED, ... Who knows how many of these agencies there are that are up to nothing but dirty tricks and manufacturing consent.
    2
  37. You're treated like a traitor at work if you vote Republican, and you work in education. It's an article of faith that must not be violated, and it percolates into the classroom. This phenomenon went on steroids when the Humanities departments hijacked campus governance, inserting themselves into every discipline with total nonsense, and they used their own garbage "peer-reviewed" canon to ram it down everyone's throats.
    1
  38. The entire welfare state is based on capturing the poor, be they black or white.
    1
  39. Read the Great Barrington Declaration. The official response to COVID has been all wrong.
    1
  40. Electric Vehicles are pretty practical to anyone living in their own house, who don't need to commute an hour to and from work every day or whose job doesn't entail driving hundreds of miles every day. I think it can and SHOULD be a growth market, without ANY government intervention. There will never be enough batteries in the near future to replace internal combustion engines. But for SOME people, it will make a lot of sense and even be cheaper than fossil fuels. My sister has an e-bike, and she loves it. If you re-think how big and heavy you need to make a car, there could be a light, 4-wheeled vehicle that looks like something between a bike and a conventional car or truck, could be good for people who don't need to travel long distances every day. There's a limit to how much of that can be done to replace fossil-fueled engines. Let price and availability in a free market determine what and how much we go in that direction. But I think the conventional gas-powered vehicle is - and should be - for years to come. People are generally mindful of the environment. It's not that gasoline engines are bad, but too MUCH of it is a bad thing. Lots of ways to KEEP them and at the same time reduce our environmental impact. Don't situate your home an hour away from work. Work remotely, if you have a skill conducive to remote work. Not everybody has to do everything to put us on a trend to better balance with Nature. Freedom's how we get there. Not governmental intervention, which ALWAYS back-fires.
    1
  41. This has been going on for a long time, only it was easier to prevent establishment ideas from ever being before the Internet. It's been that way since at least FDR. Informal systems of control amounted to officials making a few phone calls to a very small number of big news operations, like WaPost, NYTimes, ABC, CBS and NBC. Then of course, there's AP and UPI. It was for the war effort during FDR and WWII, but those cozy relationships didn't go away after Victory in the Pacific. Neither did things like injecting cattle with antibiotics, and a plethora of other "emergency" measures that remained in place for decades after the war. Before Obama, it was more subtle. You had to be very well-informed by other means than establishment education and news to even know there was a bias, because the bias was in the story selection rather than in how it was reported. Since Obama, the bias is right out in the open in the reporting, itself. There was at least some attempt to give more than one viewpoint on what news that was allowed to be reported in any kind of big way, before Obama. But NOW, there are independent media with millions of viewers who point out the bias, bad facts, and most of all, stories that were EASILY memory-holed, when media were more of a monolith (from the Great Depression to Obama). The Internet changed things. Most of all, so-called "liberals" becoming the establishment changed things. They're MUCH more censorious than their more conservative (classical liberal) predecessors.
    1
  42. Even if you believe the climate fear mongers, the proposals they are making are mostly counterproductive. Many of the things people could and would do are against the law or the EPA hasn't caught up, yet, etc. We're not getting to a cleaner planet by following the recommendations of the political class for the political class. It's going to come from new ways of building homes that heat and cool themselves, new kinds of vehicles that are more efficient, better land and water management, etc. But the government, itself, is the biggest obstacle to a real, bottom-up (instead of top-down) (r)evolution in sustainable living. The government has a very few things it pushes to the exclusion of all other solutions. Their solutions require massive strip-mining and a simultaneous de-industrialization when we NEED that industry to support all the myriad of solutions there are and will be in the future. But they suck up all the resources for the one or two solutions that make well-positioned billionaires richer and leave everyone else poorer.
    1
  43. Look at the "climate change" banner inserted by YouTube "fact checkers" on this video. Proves the truth of this video.
    1
  44. Don't cede these hate-peddlers the language. It's "DIE," not "DEI."
    1
  45. If they believed in climate change, they wouldn't be buying beachfront property. If they cared about climate change, they wouldn't be flying around the globe in private jets to lecture us on climate change. If Al Gore believes in climate change, why does he have the carbon footprint of a small city?
    1
  46. I don't care if he went on a diet and says the right things. He's a snake.
    1
  47. We are now the world's leading beacon of fascism and war.
    1
  48. Single-variable solutions to multi-variable problems is Democrats' specialty. Then they can "solve" the totally predictable problems they create with yet MORE simple-minded "solutions." It's a death spiral of squalor and dependency, justifying even MORE insane Democrat "solutions."
    1
  49. Mass hysteria driven by a few self-interested industrialists. Anyone you talk to will tell you what a great idea the EPA is and how it's "saved us," when nothing could be further from the truth.
    1
  50. We will never forgive and we will never forget.
    1