Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "John Stossel" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23.  @thomasandersen5822  : It's an interesting fight. Entire generations have been indoctrinated by largely ineffective public schools. The thing to watch is the red-pill conversion rate by new generations, much like the '60s generation, that got out into the real world and say "Our teachers are full of shit," and rebelled against the regressive establishment. America has a brand-new regressive establishment, consisting largely of a generation of leaders who rebelled against the traditional order, which was good, and replaced it with drek, which is bad. Now they defend it the same way the McCarthyists of the '50s defended THEIR "world order." They were at the peak of their power right before The Fall in the '60s and '70s. The young people, NOW, see those '60s "revolutionaries" as failed prophets. They did their thing, and they're leaving THEIR children with a mountain of debt and an oppressive system of Cultural Marxism infecting education, media and government. The government can turn its Eye of Sauron on any individual it chooses, and RUIN them. It's always been this way, but the hippies, it turns out, are no different than those who came, before, once in power. The wheel just keeps turning. Some progress gets made, some lost. Everybody's pretty much tolerant of gays, women have achieved equal pay for equal work, and so forth. I don't think that ground will be lost, although it needs a f minor/major correction, as LGBTQ and feminism have taken on some toxic aspects that need checking. Intersectionalism needs be seen for the incoherent opinions making their way into academia as canon, and give way to SCIENCE and REASON and FACTS. That will happen. It's so EASY to spoof those guys, because all their stuff is made-up. Sokal, 20 years ago, and more recently, Bogossian and a pair of (pretty brilliant) postdocs. Names are on the tip of my tongue...
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. This is a bit disingenuous. Rockefellers and Vanderbilts weren't above unfair trade practices, using their size to sell locally at a loss to wipe out local competition in any region they pleased, more or less systematically, then jack up prices, later, when they had the market cornered. That doesn't mean it was the government's job to fix. I think the CULTURE fixes those things better and with fewer side-effects. Word gets out that you're a cheat, and people will go out of their way not to do business with you. The biggest side-effect is the way the regulatory agency ends up giving future unfair practices a government seal of approval and a government shield. They were also robber barons in the sense that they were in no great hurry to share their largesse with their workers. I agree that people of today don't appreciate that for most of the workers, the alternatives in the countryside were all worse. Nevertheless, I agree with the claim that OSHA isn't what "reformed" the workplace. Things were already trending that way under unregulated capitalism. As Henry Ford realized, if his workers couldn't afford to buy his cars, there was only so much profit to be made catering to the rich. He needed a middle class to keep his markets expanding. That meant paying his workers better. Also, by improving safety conditions, "robber barons" found it easier to hire and retain better workers, and get some loyalty in return. EPA isn't what's making things cleaner. USDA and FDA aren't maximizing the food value or the safety of medicines for consumers. Transparency and tough competition is what make and keep companies moral. Government agencies give companies a blueprint for how to cheat without getting on the wrong side of the law or the regulators. As long as you check all THEIR boxes, everything's supposedly good, even though we KNOW that most of the food we eat is grown by "chemical farming" and GMO. Nutritional value is shrinking and toxins in the food are increasing (They call it "pest resistance" but they're basically getting the crops to create pesticides, abortifacts, sterilization vectors and pest repellants into the crops, themselves. "Totally organic. Didn't spray ANY pesticide. We've engineered it to secrete Roundup from its leaves! Isn't that wonderful?"
    1
  47. Trump isn't erratic. He's a salesman and a negotiator. You always extoll the virtues of what you're selling, and in negotiations, you never ask for what you WANT. You ask for the MOON and hope to get something CLOSE to what you want. My main problem with Trump was he didn't do his homework on who his closest advisors, cabinet members and generals should be, and he didn't have the right guy advising him in that area of weakness. I think his instincts were generally good, but there were (and are) just too many forces arrayed against him in the "business-as-usual" departments and federal agencies that live in an ecosystem that prospers at the expense of everyone else's (not just at home but abroad). If the feds are offering subsidies to electric car manufacturers, you KNOW it's about their buddies who make or want to make electric cars, but it's NOT to save the environment. It's to funnel resources to the one thing that's profitable politically for people in government and profitable for the pals who are mining Lithium (a nasty business). They'll get around to paying the guys who will ine up for subsidies to pay for the massive cleanup of all those Lithium batteries, later. Everything in its time. People won't realize what it's doing to the environment until it's so bad, it can be considered a crisis for the guys who caused it to get paid solving for us. People can always see the good things they can do with power, and the harm caused is always secondary, because "Look at the good we do." They just waste resources and store up more trouble for the future. Instead, the focus should be on laying the foundation for LETTING good things happen, and the main thing to do there is to do NOTHING. Just do the best you can where you are and share your successes and failures with the world. That's how the Internet is supposed to work. It's the only centralized thing we need, and its purpose is so we can talk to each other! Period!
    1
  48. 1