Comments by "guido toth" (@guidototh6091) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1.  @guppers8064  That is your opinion. You live the life you want and let others live there's. A lot of women need abortions for a variety of reasons and they don't need to ask your permission.
    1
  2.  @guppers8064  If you don't want an abortion, no one is forcing you to have one. Don't tread on other peoples' decisios, about which you know nothing.
    1
  3.  @rjlacaillade2519  The Court in Roe and Casey recognized that the right to decide on an abortion rested with the PEOPLE not the states OR the federal government. Republicans believe that PEOPLE should not have that individual right but that it belongs to the government, both government in the states and the federal government when it comes to the District of Columbia. The Dobbs decision was the single biggest theft of individual rights in the history of the USSC.
    1
  4. What facts did this report get wrong, if any? Answer me that.
    1
  5.  @euphoriaggaminghd  Most German SS personnel at death camps were volunteers. I have never read an account of the SS shooting their own for seeking a transfer from a death camp, as a number did. I have absolutely no sympathy for him.
    1
  6. Prove it with credible evidence.
    1
  7. Actually the people have god given rights according to the framers, not states. Roe recognized the right of the people to decide about abortions for themselves. Dobbs takes that away and gives that power to government.
    1
  8.  @nelson6236  The question is do you let individuals decide that according to their own morals, ethics, and personal circumstances or do you let government decide for her.
    1
  9. Sadly I agree although many comments are from Americans but yes, many are. No matter where these people live, they have little understanding of what really happened at places like Auschwitz-Birkenau.
    1
  10.  @john_doe_not_found  26 states have or are poised to criminalize abortion in the first trimester, which is when 91% of all abortions take place. That is the result of the Republican party thinking that government should make such decisions, not individuals.
    1
  11.  @kingorange7739  If it is murder, and it isn't, then how would you punish the women who induce abortion by taking medication? That is the way most abortions are performed in the US these days.
    1
  12.  @kingorange7739  Criminal punishment of women who have abortions is something they didn't even do before Roe v. Wade become law. If no punishment, there is no murder. If there is punishment, then Americans maybe will be just shocked enough by such a sharia law that they might get rid of abortion restrictions in red states.
    1
  13.  @kingorange7739  If you want to make America pro choice I encourage you to drum up support for arresting women who have abortions.
    1
  14.  @kingorange7739  Then it isn't murder by your own statement. You call it murder but you aren't prepared to treat the woman as a murderer, as they do in many states with life in prison or even the death penalty.
    1
  15.  @kingorange7739  You can't have it both ways. If you give the woman no punishment or a slap on the wrist then you are admitting it is not murder. And it isn't murder by the way. Never has been.
    1
  16. The Constitution says nothing about the right to marry, have children, buy birth control, send your kids to private schools and so many other things that are our rights and which have been recognized under the 9th and 14th Amendments.
    1
  17.  @OptimalOwl  So you agree then a State can make it a crime for a married couple to use birth control and the married couple has no constitutionnal freedom to use it? Really?
    1
  18.  @OptimalOwl  Actually it does violate the Constitution and the court ruled that in 1965. You seem to prefer that government make decisions about birth control. I recognized, like the vast majority of Americans, that it is an individual right. You prefer government, I prefer individuals.
    1
  19.  @OptimalOwl  You just said a state can make birth control illegal. You just said the Griswold case, that was ruled on in 1965 is wrong and that if Alabama for instance wants to outlaw condoms, they can. The Constitution recognized in the 9th and 14th Amendments that the Bill of Rights is not an exclusive list. Marriage, bearing children, sending them to private schools, etc are not mentioned in the Constitution but all have been recognized as being rights that the states can't easily interfere with. You seem to think that the Constitution gave people limited rights. It is the other way around. People gave the government limited rights in the Constitution.
    1
  20.  @OptimalOwl  Roe and Casey had it right. People can and DO differ about the the morality of abortion but they decide for themselves. We DO recognize that the most fundamental right we have as people is to decide about things like our bodies, our right to have children or not have children. You have the 9th Amendment totally wrong. It was written by the founders to say to government that the right to free speech, right to a jury trial, etc are NOT the only fundamental rights that people have. The whole idea of the Bill of Rights is to protect people from GOVERNMENT.
    1
  21. I feel bad for the hundreds of thousands of people who were murdered Auschwitz-Bikrenau. Not for the people who took part in genocide.
    1
  22.  @thegamesbrotherssvk5135  You feel bad for the Nazis who committed genocide? Seriously? What is wrong with you?
    1
  23.  @thegamesbrotherssvk5135  The commandant at Auschwitz-Birkenau where 1.1 million people were murdered said he was following orders. He was still a war criminal.
    1
  24.  @thegamesbrotherssvk5135  He volunteered to join the SS and work at a death camp. To his credit, he requested a transfer which was granted. You seem to be willing to forgive those who did murder people at Nazi death camps. I won't. Ever.
    1
  25. Under Roe and Casey individuals had a right to decide on abortion. Under the Dobbs decision, there is no individual right, the right now belongs to government. A big step forward for government, one giant leap backwards for individual rights.
    1
  26.  @PrinnyCast  A woman can no longer get an abortion legally in many red states as of today. She could yesterday. She has lost a right. Plain and simple.
    1
  27.  @Dustin030888  It was up until this morning.
    1
  28.  @strawdemindset  9th Amendment "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." 14th Amendment right of due process: "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"
    1
  29. @Bill Randleman For 50 years the right was recognized until the right wing Catholics on the court decided to revoke it for made up reasons. If they can take it away, a court in a few years can reinstate it.
    1
  30.  @juniorjohnson9509  The Court gutted the right to privacy so and opened the door to states making gay marriage unlawful, birth control access unlawful and any other invasion of the bedroom lawful.
    1
  31.  @juniorjohnson9509  No. The Court's wrong decision means that states can outlaw abortion if they want. They took away the right from individuals.
    1
  32.  @juniorjohnson9509  The founders also pass the bill of rights, specifically the 9th and 14th Amendments because they didn't trust states to protect individual rights. The Court in Roe recognized this and that is why women got to decide for themselves. The Catholic extremists on the Court in Dobbs decided to take away that individual right and hand it over to state governments.
    1
  33.  @juniorjohnson9509  Women have lost rights as of yesterday. Their rights have been transferred to politicians. If you don't understand that basic fact, there is nothing I can do to help you understand reality.
    1
  34. Killing of a Capital cop, injuring 60 more, threatening the lives of the Vice President, Speaker of the House and others. Rioting, looting, attempted coup.
    1
  35. Roe left it up to the individual. The Republicans believe it should be left up to government.
    1
  36.  @herpderp1750  You have it completely backwards. The Court in Roe and Casey recognized that individuals, not state OR federal governments, should make decisions about abortion. The Alito decision takes this right away from people and hands it to the government.
    1
  37.  @herpderp1750  The Alito court trusts government to make abortion decisions and not individuals. If you love government you will love Alito's Dobbs decision. I trust individuals more.
    1
  38.  @herpderp1750  Your comment is a perfect example of why individuals should make the decision, not government. Because a huge percentage of people disagree with you, you should have no power over their decision making. After all, they don't tell you what to do about abortion.
    1
  39. You are celebrating taking away the right of black and brown women to have abortions because why? You know what they need more than them?
    1
  40.  @jaimeosbourn3616  26 states, a majority of the states have now banned or about to criminalize abortion. A few of these states have small exceptions, some have almost none. All of them are so arrogant that they know better than the woman. You should worry about keeping your own legs closed and not judge other people.
    1
  41.  @jaimeosbourn3616  I've read the Roe decision, the Casey decision, the Dobbs decision and about 100 other cases involving the right of privacy. So I am very well aware of what the Court has done for the last 60 years with the right of privacy. I'm sure when a new court in a few years reinstates Roe, they will also say that Plessy v Ferguson was the law for 60 years and was wrong and that the Dobbs case is wrong too, as they reinstate Roe.
    1
  42.  @jaimeosbourn3616  Hilarious. I'm sure you would think I was "competent" if I agreed with you but because I don't you claim I'm not competent. You would rather argue about that the defend the fact that Dobbs took away the decision whether to have an abortion from individuals and gave it to the government.
    1
  43.  @wittmoneyman  The Bill of Rights is not an exclusive list. Republicans now seem to think it is, which is amusing because they use to claim that rights belong to the people except where the Constitution gives power to the government. With the Dobbs case there is no more individual right to decide on an abortion it is up to the government.
    1
  44.  @jaimeosbourn3616  Oh they do and that is why they are taking that right away and giving it to the government which is exactly why we needed Roe. Government can't be trusted with fundamental rights and that is WHY we have a Bill of Rights.
    1
  45.  Richard  The right to marry and have children isn't an enumerated right in the Constitution either. Can a state mandate a one child policy like they had in China ? No.
    1
  46.  Richard  Says you. The good thing about the Roe decision was the women could make this decision and not have to follow the dictates of politicians who know better than them.
    1
  47.  Richard  The Constitution doesn't limit the rights that people have, it limits the ability of government to take away those rights. Such as the right to marry who you want, the right to use birth control, both for married and unmarried couples, the right to engage in any kind of sexual activity in the privacy of your home, the right whether or not to have an abortion. None are mentioned in the Constitution and all of those rights have, in in the past, been infringed on by the states. The only part of government standing up for those rights was the Court, until now.
    1
  48.  Richard  I just listed actual instances where states took away rights and the court overturned their ability. For 100 years the Court has recognized that the list of rights in the Bill of Rights is not exclusive under the 9th and 14th Amendments. Try taking away the right of people to marry who they want, their ability to use birth control, the right of people to decide whether to get an abortion and see the push back. For the first time in history the Court has taken away a right it once recognized and unless stopped, they won't stop. Thomas has already invited challenges to the nearly 60 year old case that prevents states from denying people the right to use birth control. If you love government you will love that. I prefer individual liberty.
    1
  49.  Richard  Thomas does. Extremist right wing Christians do, they are already planning on bans for Plan B, IUDs, etc. These people want any birth control banned that, in their minds, goes against God's will. Lots of right wing Republicans are on their side. Point is, if Americans don't have the right to birth control, then the government can do what it wants. The Dobbs decision opened the door for that. That is why I trust individual freedom more than government.
    1
  50.  Richard  Unless checked by the Bill of Rights the government will take away as much power as they like. The Alito court agrees that government can control the most fundamental, personnel reproductive decisions people can make. I and most Americans disagree.
    1