Comments by "Winston Smith" (@kryts27) on "China Observer"
channel.
-
248
-
187
-
180
-
Supermarkets in Australia are stable businesses in large towns and cities. It is rare that these food retailers go out if business. Taken over by other corporations and business buyouts; yes, collapse (like the Franklin group in the early 2000s), because an unsustainable business model and over-leveraged credit also yes. But collapse because of drop in consumer demand (except in a few rare places) is almost unheard of. The economic collapse in supermarkets appears to be the case in China in First Tier cities (what is happening in other regional areas and cities in China may be worse), because of low consumer demand. Foreign retail companies are leaving because of poor profits, relatively high overhead costs and less Chinese consumers. The CCP's asinine recent anti-espionage law also targets all foreign businesses in China, so this is also a push factor for foreign companies. Coupled with high unemployment and wage drops for the middle class in China, including erstwhile small business owners who used to be consumers too, when the economy was doing well. China's large population is no longer an asset to it either. With a rapidly aging population due to the One Child Policy, forceably enacted for 40 years since the 1970s has made China's Japanization demographic and economic decline in the 1990s, now similar but also considerably worse than Japan's. Unlike Japan which got rich before it grew old, China overall will not even enjoy this benefit.
105
-
The Soviets did the same in the 1960s by diverting water away from the Amu Darya or Oxus river in Central Asia for cotton irrigation, which fed water annually to the Aral Sea (previously a giant freshwater lake, despite the "sea" suffix). This was the Soviet's, "mankind's engineering to conquor nature", a similar sentiment echoed by the CCP over their even larger hydrological construction, the Three Gorges Dam. By 2000, more than two thirds of the Aral Sea had shrunk, the remaining water was too salty for the native fish to live in and the previously thriving fishing industry on it had vanished and in the semi-arid climate of the steppe, the exposed lake bed of millions of hectares had become exposed and a dust-bowl harbouring toxic levels of pesticide residue (such as DDT whose toxic bi-products remains in the soil for over 300 years) had become airborne with the dust, affecting the health of everyone living in that area. How is the Three Gorges Dam going to environmentally play out? Too early to tell if it's going to be a disaster as bad or worse than the Aral Sea, but time will tell.
103
-
92
-
84
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
70
-
64
-
58
-
54
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
41
-
39
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
Vietnam has a kong history with China.. of being invaded. Vietnam also has had a long history of resisting these invasions (except cultural, like Rome some things that came out of China were appreciated), to the great annoyance of the Chinese. But like the Romans, the Chinese emipres of old and the current CCP indicate that China is an expansionist land power, and continually pushes at it's borders into smaller bordering states like Vietnam.
The French invasion of the nineteenth century, and the Americans of the twentieth of Vietnam were eggregious, but not of prime importance to the Vietnamese, because once the whites were gone they were unlikely to return as hostile invaders, and their homelands are far away.
Unfortunately, to the Vietnamese, China is awlawys there and continually grabbing parcels of land off of it. The massacre of 80รท Vietnamese at the Battle of the Spratley Islands probably is another untold chapter of enormities against Vietnam that the Vietnamese have not forgotten.
It would not suprise me, that when the CCP collapses, the Vietnamese may re-occupy the Paracel Islands and some parts of it's Northern provinces that China grabbed off it in tbe 1979 Sino-Vietnamese war. There may also be temptation for the Vietnamese to take over Heinan island, if they are strong enough at sea.
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
25
-
Russia cannot confront all of NATO directly. Doing so finishes Russia within a year, despite it's size. China's allies are all quite weak; 3 out of 4 nuclear armed, yes, but collectively NATOs nuclear missiles match the number of the "Axis of Evil", only because of Russia. The Soviet Union came to an accord with NATO 35 years ago, under Gorbachev, ending the Cold War. Not just because Gorbachev was friendly to the West, but mainly because the Soviet Union was bankrupt and could not sustain (back then) cost of armament and miitary technology parity with the West with a moribund economy. The CCP launched it's military challenge too early to have an overwhelming buildup in ships and warplanes to challenge the US and it's allies (including some NATO allies). Even in the excess warships (counting hulls, not tonnage), the PLAN ships are not as technologically advanced as the US and Pacific allies and it's sailors are not as well trained. The CCP's idological desire to launch an attack on Taiwan is driven by 2 factors; 1. XI jinping's obsession about this and 2. The failed "Wolf Warrior" diplomacy act as a cover-up for causing the Covid19 pandemic out of Wuhan, China. These investigations are still stymied by the CCP and aggressive denial may be cover for guilt. Especially if "gain of function" germ warfare was pursued. Given the secrecy about this, and other coverups by the CCP such as the genocide of Uyghers in Xinjiang, and other concurrent Crimes Against Humanity by the CCP, we should certainly not trust the word or actions of the CCP these days.
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
Because Taiwan is an island, naval and air superior over it must be maintained with intensity, continually for over 60 days by the PLA for any amphibious invasion over it to succeed. Significant lapses in this intensity, due to logistics bottlenecks, enemy counter-offensives or mistakes and false intelligence by the PLA hands time and preparation to the Taiwanese and the allies of Taiwan (primarily the US and Japan).
I doubt this is sustained level of intensity is achievable by the PLA for several reasons; 1. Lack of leadership and a comprehensive strategic plan. While this plan is probably still secret by the PLA, the leadership conflict issues are severe, 2. Logistics issues. The PLA has not fought a sustained military conflict for nearly 50 years. They have little experience in maintaining supply lines to battlefields, particularly made worse by a hostile sea barrier, 3. Comprehensive tactical plans of engagement. The PLA has no real plan to engage the Taiwanese air and sea forces effectively long-term, let alone against a major superpower (US) once it becomes actively engaged in the defence of Taiwan. This is in stark contract to Showa Japan in 1940-42, which at least had a partially effective naval and island hopping plan, 4. Political conversion against Taiwanese democracy. Ironically, this is the best chance the CCP has in taking over Taiwan, seeing that both countries share the same language. But because of bellicose territorial aggression by the PLA and Wolf Warrior diplomacy by the CCP, which psychologically tried fear rather than persuasion, this also is a failure.
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16