Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. Yup it never ends. Now they're like genocide in Gaza? What genocide? Where?
    1
  2.  @MovieGuy808  What a ridiculous comment.
    1
  3.  @ottomueller4425  The Russians have set up their air defense system. It's a lot more powerful and efficient than that so-called Iron dome that Israel has.
    1
  4. What choice do they have, their government policy put these poor people in this situation. If they hadn't illegally invaded their neighbor's internationally recognized territory and ethnically cleansed 800,000 Azeri civilians. This mess wouldn't be happening right now.
    1
  5.  @fpsserbia6570  This was probably the one time a Nato intervention was the right thing to do. It's a rare event when a Nato intervention actually saves lives.
    1
  6.  @neekola88  And how exactly does this excuse Serbia attacking civilians and slaughtering them like cattle? You want to set up a boogyman and somehow rationalize the slaughter of women and children? "Oh they're XYZ, they deserve it."
    1
  7.  @frankjames7272  imagine every nation with some vague historical claim to something invaded their neighbors and starting ethnically cleansing people like Armenia did. No one on this planet is going to agree with that.
    1
  8.  @EricChan-ug5nz  You're not wrong. The Armenians were offered a really good deal in the late 1990s. Where they keep Karabakh and were offered to keep about 40% of the other territories they took. They said no because they wanted it all. Negotiating with people that deep into their own cognitive dissonance must be quite frustrating. I can understand why after 30 years Azerbaijan gave up and settled the issue by force. The only thing keeping Azeri forces from marching on Yerevan is essentially the Russians. And yet the Armenians are now turning their backs on the Russians. You couldn't make this stuff up if you tried. The insanity in their society and body politic is absolutely mind numbing.
    1
  9.  @duncanpurves7955  Yes yes, being stuffed into a concentration camp where food and water has been cut off, they have "plenty of food" Do you even think through these ridiculous narratives you're pushing?
    1
  10.  @jonathanaltman1015  As if anyone even believes the anti Hamas news anymore. The IDF and worldwide propaganda machine trying to shield their crimes has lied so often, has been caught so many times that even when they're telling the truth no one will believe them.
    1
  11.  @blackmantis3130  Oh they'll condemn for sure. The EU is really good at making psuedo moral empty statements which they won't back up. In fact they might be the best in the world at such a thing. The reality is there isn't anything they can do, even if they wanted to. The EU is a weak organization which really has no say on security matters internationally.
    1
  12. Armenia invades Azerbaijan's internationally recognized territory in the 1990s and ethnically cleanses 800,000 civilans BBC Says: Nothing to see here Azerbaijan retakes this territory in 2020 and only about 20 civilians die in the entire conflict. BBC says: Ethnic cleansing. These networks just can't help it, they're so used to pushing false narratives that it is second nature to them.
    1
  13.  @UndertakerFromWWE  All those nations recognize Azerbaijan's and Armenia's borders. Even Armenia itself never officially recognized that illegal settlement in Nagorno Karabakh as a state or part of Armenia. You might want to look it up. When I said every nation, I meant every nation.
    1
  14.  @floralbeautyful  Controlling who can and who can't cross your border isn't racist. It's almost like claiming having a front door to your house is racist. Yes Greece is pretty ridiculous with 99% of things they do, this wall itself is also ridiculous considering most of the refugees go into Greece via boats through the water. This wall I'd imagine is probably a huge waste of EU tax payer money and thought up to make some contractors close to the government rich. It won't stop refugees because that isn't where the refugees come from. But in principle controlling borders isn't racist. You'd have to really stretch the word racist into some odd territory to make that happen.
    1
  15. @Sandman, Sending a lightweight like the French president would probably embolden Putin more than anything.
    1
  16.  @stevencharnock9271  Why would the Russians buy second rate overpriced equipment from France?
    1
  17. @@user-sn1th8di1s he understood it just fine. He is paid to spin it in a certain way to push the false narrative that he is given.
    1
  18.  @NoWindNoSunNoPower  The UN has nothing to talk to Hamas about, Hamas isn't breaking any international laws. International law is quite clear that an occupied people have a right to resist by "any means they deem necessary." No crime, no international laws being broken=Nothing to talk about. With Israel however, it has literally broken nearly every single war crime statue ever written down.
    1
  19.  @Finalboss619  Truth be told Putin isn't running around going out of his way to slaughter civilians.
    1
  20. It is quite literally the textbook definition of separatism. Look up the word lol As far as the EU, what exactly can they do even if they wanted to? They have zero ability to project any sort of power these days. And even if they could, they still wouldn't. They don't want to be seen internationally as backing up illegal invasions, occupations and ethnic cleansing. Especially when they're trying to play the moral high ground over what RUssia did. What Amenia did was 10x worse, how can Europe be seen backing that?
    1
  21.  @ziziqar  Yes because anyone who doesn't agree with your insane view on this topic must magically be getting paid by someone right? You sound just the idiots here at home where anyone who speaks truth about what is happening in Ukraine is magically under Putin's payroll. Fact of the matter is simple. You can't invade another nation's internationally recognized territory, brutally ethnically cleanse 800,000 civilians and then pretend to be the victims of the story. It doesn't work like that champ. Regardless of how hard you try to sweep ethnic cleansing and war crimes under the table. You do also realize this is the age of the internet and cancel culture right? I'd imagine you probably live in a Western nation. How do you think people where you work would feel if they knew you were online shilling and trying to rationalize ethnic cleansing and mass murder of civilians? Not a good look.
    1
  22.  @ziziqar  Also if you felt this strongly on this issue and had a shred of dignity, you'd be over there doing something about it. Not sitting in my country with your pseudo nationlism spouting insanity
    1
  23. Very few journalists these days hold criminals accountable for their actions. In fact their job is to shield them.
    1
  24. Disputed territory BBC? Really? I know we live in an era of fake news where networks push a narrative but imagine leaving out the most critical piece of information like "This territory is internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan which was illegally invaded and annexed by Armenia in the 1990s." That just might have given viewers context as to why this conflict erupted.
    1
  25. What a ridiculous question the BBC is posing. Obviously they will ignore it.
    1
  26. So what happens if a member of Nato uses their veto on Finland joining?
    1
  27. @Blob B You'd be surprised. There are a few who are likely to and one who is 100% confirmed to threaten they will. Unfortunately for Sweden they've been supporting a terrorist organization that has killed about 30,000 civilians in a Nato country. They just might be a tad bit upset about it? lol
    1
  28. "The mystery of why Serbian population backs Russia" Seriously BBC, the "mystery" of why? Come on..... I'm pretty sure it wasn't Moscow that bombed Belgrade not that long ago. Just sayin....
    1
  29.  @WH-hi5ew  Oh absolutely, I was all for the bombing of Belgrade. However I'm not sure what exactly that has to do with how the Serbians perceived it?
    1
  30. @Iain Phillips, I'm not sure I'd be so gracious when facing a group of people who invaded my internationally recognized my territory and mercilessly ethnically cleansed more than half a million of my people in the 1990s. Who is to say they won't do it again? Best to push their administration out of the region completely so they can't get the bright idea to start massacring half a million civilians again. It's best for both sides.
    1
  31.  @iainphillips3725  So basically you're claiming that well over half a million Azeri civilians weren't ethnically cleansed in the 1990s? Cool story bro, the Turks keep telling me the same thing about how many Armenians died in the genocide, the claim "it wasn't that much." I'm glad to see you're learning the tactics of ethnic cleansing denial well.
    1
  32.  @iainphillips3725  I've never been to either Armenia or Azerbaijan, closest I've been was a 5 day visit to Georgia (beautiful nation). I've also only met one Azeri in my entire life who was a fairly nice guy and have met around 20 Armenians who for the most part were very nice people as well. With that said, lets not turn this into a ridiculous shit fest of identity based debated. The facts are the facts and I'm merely articulating the reality of the situation which for one reason or another you refuse to accept.
    1
  33.  @iainphillips3725  You might want to look up how many refugees ended up in Azerbaijan, all well verified by independent sources. With some people there seems to be a huge disconnect with what is and what they want to be. It seems that is what I'm dealing with here. You also should realize this wasn't that long ago and many of the people who perpetrated these crimes are still alive, many of them still in the armed forces of Armenian Karabakh. Well now lets say what is left of them.
    1
  34.  @iainphillips3725  You do understand what ethnic cleansing is right? When you kill, push out or intimidate a group of people into leaving an area. Hence having "ethnically "cleansed it. We know how many survived when they ran away, god knows how many didn't.
    1
  35.  @louistournas120  Civilians massacred where probably well over 50k along with roughly 600,000 ethnically cleansed from occupied villages and cities.
    1
  36.  @louistournas120  I never realized that Wikipedia which can be changed by anyone was the ultimate source to settle a debate. I guess it makes sense when someone clutching for straws and has no real debate material. I guess all those people living there simply up and vanished into the wind like a fart. Real believable champ, well played. You get the award for horrible human being of the day.
    1
  37.  @louistournas120  You really haven't figured out how things work do you? When Russia completely and utterly started slaughtering people in the north Caucasus how well was it covered in western media and was it talked about at the UN? Before the adoption of the internet no one really cared about what happens in remote areas on top of a mountain which has no economic or geostrategic value. Again, you literally want people to believe half a million people were living somewhere and then up and vanished into thin air? All because of some subject view you have? Seriously?
    1
  38.  @louistournas120  Yea Turkey should for sure own up to the Armenian genocide. I do however find it interesting that you sound just like the Turks in denying what happened to the Azeris in the 1990s. Have you been reading their "How to deny mass crimes 101" Step 1: Pretend it never happened Step 2: Claim there isn't enough evidence. Step 3 Blame your victims. So when are you going to head down to step since you're following the handbook so well?
    1
  39.  @louistournas120  I'm not sure what events from over 100 years ago between you and a third party have to do with what happened with the Azeris in the 1990s. You ask me to answer questions yet you can't stay on topic.
    1
  40.  @louistournas120  You're literally trying to rationalize ethnic cleansing with some subjective view of historical events. Then to make matters worse, when you have no leg to stand on you're literally trying to drag people's personal identity into this. What I am or who I am doesn't in anyway, shape or form change the fact that you're trying to rationalize and whitewash the ethnic cleansing of more than half a million civilians. Then to make matters worse, you complain about another group who also is denying their same actions well over 100 years ago. The fact you don't understand the insanity in your point of view is quite frankly terrifying. So let me some this up. Lets say I steal my neighbor's house and kill his family members, when someone calls me out I come up with these talking points. 1. Well someone killed my grandfather years ago, so that makes it okay for me to go rob and kill my neighbor. 2. The people killed probably deserved it. 3. Who are you to judge, may I ask your nationality or ethnic origin. You my friend are a terrifying human being (if I can call you a human being at all)
    1
  41.  @louistournas120  You'd like to think it plays a role but it doesn't. You simply can't be like well someone killed my great great great grandfather so I'm going to go slaughter my neighbor and his family. Again, it's insanity and you're still trying to peddle it. You can't just be a normal human being and outright say "Yes, slaughtering civilians and ethnically cleansing half a million people might not have been a good idea." Instead you literally try to blame everyone else except the murders themselves.
    1
  42.  @louistournas120  There is no way 500k Azeri civilians were killed. Many were killed but 500k is insane, no one claimed that. Ethnic cleansing is when you forcibly remove people from where they live due to their ethnicity. In this case by the threat of murder. You might want to look up what the definitions of the words being used mean before going off emotional tangents.
    1
  43.  @louistournas120  I'm well aware of what I wrote my issue is that you literally don't know what ethnic cleansing means and are formulating your entire argument based off this. The fact I spelled it out for you in plain English and you still persist with your insanity has me completely and utterly shocked.
    1
  44.  @louistournas120  Yea they started massacring a civilian population of 500k. Honestly does the English language confuse you? They started massacring them and the rest of them ran way. TEXTBOOK definition of ethnic cleansing. I'm still confused as to what you're trying to debate here. Are you literally trying to rationalize this type of behavior? You think it's appropriate behavior and do you believe the Azeris coming back and pushing these murderous illegal militia groups off their territory was a bad thing? If so, do you also strangle puppies for fun on the weekends and push old women down stairs for kicks?
    1
  45.  @cplcabs  is that why we saw footage of destroyed Israeli air bases? No no civilian casualties? Seems you don't like reality.
    1
  46. @Sasha not really this will blow over. Israel will eventually kill enough people that forces the Palestinians back into their prisons and all will be forgotten.
    1
  47.  @nauridea  I'ts probably what makes them a tad bit more organized than the inbreds who are indigenous to that region.
    1
  48. I find all the Tate references in the comments section rather interesting. My how times have changed and alternate media has really taken off, these elites in their ivory towers can't fully control the narrative anymore and they're in full blown panic mode. Tate probably has more viewers than BBC and picking a fit with him will not end well for them. It reminds me of when CNN tried to take on Joe Rogan and instantly regretted it.
    1
  49.  @jakebhenry2228  So we're going to invade the fact Armenia illegally invaded their neighbor's internationally recognized territory and ethnically cleansed over 800,000 civilians? It simply never happened? You're going to blame their victims? Seriously?
    1
  50. If they're not sending weapons or punishing either side, that is the definition of neutrality. Having friendly relations with a nation at war doesn't make you party to their war. Unless you start aiding them in their war effort.
    1