Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "Global News" channel.

@jonatand2045 The difference is when the bullets start flying, nations won't react unless they're legally bound to react. In some cases they do react but it's rare. If you think people would risk WW3 to help Sweden out unless they're legally obligated to, I'd like to have what ever you've been smoking . Ukraine thought large European nations would step in for them as well. All they got were some weapons and a pat on the back saying "go get em Tiger." Sweden will get the same.
1
@jonatand2045 Nations will literally find any excuse they can find to avoid a world war. There is no way in hell people would risk nuke Armageddon for Sweden. Anyone who believes they would needs to look at the situation with a more rational eye. Yes nations would help, the same way they're helping Ukraine. Money, weapons, Mercenaries a pat on the back and sanctions on Russia. That's all Sweden will get. Nor is Sweden going to be able to defend itself like Ukraine either because cultural marxism has completely and utter emasculated their male population. They're going to fold like Oregami.
1
@jonatand2045 I guess that is something you'd like to believe but all reason and logic points in the other direction. That is the scary thing about WW3, conflict can escalate in ways no one can control. No one is going to risk that, risk all that for what? An irrelevant nation like Sweden? If they were in Nato that's a different story, not to mention the deterrent that brings. Also the narrative you're complaining about is something you seem to have an issue with. It's called reality.
1
@jonatand2045 If only life was that simple and not as dangerous. You're right about the younger generation considering you're acting like you're part of that generation where everything is over simplified to fit into a narrow childish worldview. Ignoring the complexities of the world.
1
@vanillanights Nothing like the situation with Russia. Last I checked Ukrainian terrorist organizations haven't killed 30,000 Russians with terror attacks over the past few decades. In fact I'm not sure there has been one attack by Ukrainians inside Russia before the war. So no, not the same situation as Russia.
1
@johnrimhong4287 You don't have to take what the Turks are saying about the PKK seriously. It would be rational however to take what the Kurds themselves are saying about the PKK no? The only Kurdish government on the planet (Northern administration of Iraq) is also fighting the PKK and they're helping Turkey target the PKK camps. So the Kurdish government is saying the PKK are terrorists, the Turks are saying the PKK are terrorists, the PKK is on a list of terrorist organizations in the United States, the EU and most Nato countries. So yes, please do your research.
1
@The Grate Potato. So there is an organization hiding in the northern Iraq mountains and are not only conducting terror attacks across the border in another nation but are also fighting the official legal Kurdish regional government as well. And you're complaining when this organization is getting bombed with the blessing of the regional government there? Are you serious? What is disgusting is that you'd want groups like these protected. Do you enjoy seeing hospitals, schools and other civilian targets being blown up? Does it give you a stiffy or something? On a scale of 1-10 how horrible of a human being are you?
1
@wildroses3040 I think he is also taking a shot at England, France and Germany.
1
user-cw5do8sd7m Two things about your comment. 1. People who are educated and want to claim someone else is not. They usually establish why. 2. People who are educated would not formulate such a childish sentence. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you're either from Pakistan or India. It is usually from that region where I see this type of child like trolling.
1
@Oldmanpeace. Erdogan has already picked a side, he is firming on board with the Palestinians. But if you mean militarily tipping the balances, no. I highly doubt Turkiye is interested in sparking ww3. Think through what would happen if they did intervene militarily. They'd mobilize a well trained battled hardened army of nearly 2 million men with more modern gadgets than most nations have. They'd sweep through the entire region like a steam roller, nothing in the region would be able to stop them and they'd run over Israel and everything inbetween. But you know what happens if they do that? WW3 and we all die. So yea, they're not interested in that and won't be tipping any balances anytime soon.
1
Yea a dictator who's party lost the midterm elections. I've never seen that happen before.
1
@Greg that's a pretty stupid question.
1
@Arman Peterson, That does sound rather strange. You know what is stranger? Imagine trying to join a collective defense organization where every member has a legal obligation to defend you while at the same time you're funding armed groups which are blowing up schools and hospitals in a member state of said member? Yup, Sweden. The nation run by woke geniuses lol
1
@GratDuForloradeArgumentet See that is a fair position to hold. Unfortunately for you your government doesn't share your views. Also don't forget that it was Sweden which applied for Nato membership, not Nato asking Sweden.
1
@Rocktostone, ONe doesn't have to be a Palestinian or a supporter to tell you what Hamas is to Gaza. First off Gaza is the world's only and history's largest concentration camp. Hamas is the resistance group to the people shoved into that concentration camp.
1
The major difference being the Turks aren't bombing civilian areas like Israel does.
1
@okay1176 In their last incursion into Iraq do you have any sort of proof of this? Last I checked there aren't many civilian centers to bomb up on the peaks of mountains which happen to be in the middle of nowhere. Things don't become true simply because you want them to be.
1
Remind Ya So they invade an entire area to neutralize armed groups and 8 civilians die? When Israel invades an area 8 civilians die every 10 seconds. That is the difference between targeting civilians and civilians dying as collateral damage. I guess someone had to "Remind Ya" of the difference.
1
Remind Ya Yes murder is murder. But you do realize the difference between accidental deaths and actually going out of your way to kill as many people as possible right? Most rational people would understand that difference. So the question is, are you rational or not? Also I'm not justifying anything, I'm simply questioning your sanity.
1
Remind Ya Considering their military capabilities and the lack of military capability in Syria, if you believe they were "targetting civilians" you think only 8 would have died during an invasion? Are you freaking serious? If what you claimed was true and they were trying to kill civilians there would be a few thousand dead. So honestly, on a scale of 1-10 how crazy are you? Why does simple logic simply not register for you? You're still trying to convince me that 2+2=5. It doesn't
1
Remind Ya You literally ignored all the reason and logic I just threw at you. This is absolutely surreal. The cognitive dissonance at play here is absolutely legendary.
1
@БолдсайханБатчимэг Sweden can't and I'd imagine the nations who can won't do so on account of Sweden.
1
Yea he was charismatic in that awkward war criminal sorta way lol
1
It's not being covered because it isn't really news. A few bombs dropped on some terrorists in some random mountain range isn't exactly earth shattering news.
1
@bayklima7864 According to that logic nearly 95% of all leaders worldwide are bad? Almost every single currency worldwide has fallen against the dollar and inflation is eating the entire planet for lunch. Not saying your president is good or bad, that isn't for me to say. What I will say is that your argument for why he is bad, doesn't really fly. Find something more convincing.
1
@Nilvolentibusje If Sweden actually had freedom of expression I would buy the arguments they're making. The trouble is, they dont' have freedom of expression and their own citizens full well know what they're allowed to say and not allowed to say. What they're allowed to think and not allowed to think.
1
@mikaeljohansson6518 I'd imagine after Russia invades Sweden no one will be wanting to go there.
1
Technology. But that is soon going to be a thing of the past.
1
@vanelruxys8358 Condemning what Hamas did would be like blaming a rape victim for scratching the rapist's face. It is crazy.
1
@BasilMinhas It was a pretty genius comment by the OP. Think about it.
1