Comments by "Wandering Existence" (@WanderingExistence) on "How Money Works" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. ​ @JosiahTaschuk  Totally! Personally, I've been interested in two grassroots groups focused on economic democracy, called the Next System Project and the Democracy Collaborative. They have devised a way to keep production local and contract service to cooperatives, called the Preston Model. They have helped multiple cities struggling with job loss due to factory closures build back their communities, in the US and UK. In addition, trade unions, collectives, public banks, credit unions, community land trusts, CSA's, and many other democratically controlled institutions can work together to create democratic networks outside the market to create an economy that doesn't reduce people, their governments, and the environment to a monetary value. I think this can be a viable strategy to give people the autonomy over their work. I believe economic democracy is the only way people who work for the economy will have the economy work for them, their families, and the planet too. This way of revitalizing communities by building community wealth has helped many communities all over the globe, and it is utilized by the UK labor party and touted by Jeremy Corbyn. Preston, Lancashire became the most improved city in the UK because of community wealth building. https://youtu.be/MObfh_VNqs4 Not to mention, much of the progress in labor rights has been due to union's collective power. The thing that draws my conviction to the movement is that I can see it now, helping empower people to live happier, healthier, and wealthier lives.
    2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36.  @thetapheonix  Ok, so we're moving the goal posts from "money printing"? I just want to be clear, this isn't money printing and this money would just be economic rent retained by shareholders if not taxed. Shareholders didn't do anything for the natural resource either, because it's a natural resource... Nobody created it. That's why it's taxed and given to the citizens of the jurisdiction as a Social Dividend. You're perfectly fine with the inflationary effects of oil revenues being pushed out as private dividends, because that's the system you're defending. You're prioritizing one singular aspect of the economy, inflation, over everything else including the marginal impact of money to make people's lives better. You haven't really said how you would address asset inflation that creates wealth inequality when you're arguing that corporations should retain economic rent. Rent seeking is monopolistic. Nobody said you had to adopt the whole Nordic system, I was simply talking about Sovereign Wealth Funds as an alternative way to manage natural resource revenues. Personally, my favorite cooperative system and believe that a UBI would help people buy equity in worker cooperatives and start small businesses. Or if it was retained in a sovereign wealth fund type investment portfolio to provide capital into cooperatives (that are often under capitalized) by purchasing non-voting shares that would help build economic development. Incentivizing saving and investment with the funds that would help decrease consumer price inflation by diverting that purchasing power. This creates asset inflation that is democratically equitable and decreases the negative aspects of wealth inequality.
    2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2